Skip to main content
Log in

Rough Neural Network of Variable Precision

  • Published:
Neural Processing Letters Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, a new method is described to construct rough neural networks. On the base of rough set model, we present a method to develop rough neural network of variable precision and train it using Levenberg–Marquart algorithm. The method is particularly attractive because it combines the advantages of both rough logic networks and neural networks. In our system, weak generalization in rough sets theory and complexity in neural network are avoided while anti-jamming performance is highly improved and the network structure is also simplified. In experiments, the network is applied to classification of remote sensing images. The results show that our method is more effective and successful than application of rough sets and neural network separately.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wang, W.-Y. and Li, Y.-H.:Evolutionary learning of BMF Fuzzy-Neural networks using a reduced-form genetic algorithm, IEEE Trans.on Systems, Man and Cybernetics-Part B:Cybernetics (2003), 1–11.

  2. Quiroga, L.A. and Rabelo, L.C.:Learning from examples:a review of machine learning, neural networks and fuzzy logic paradigms, Computers and IndustrialEngineering 29 (1–4), (1995), 561–565.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Pawlak, Z.:Why rough sets, Proc.of the Fifth IEEE InternationalConference on Fuzzy Systems 2 (1996), 739–743.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Pawlak, Z.:Vagueness and uncertainty, Inter J.of Computer Intelligence (1995), 11.

  5. Pawlak, Z.:Rough Sets, Theoretical Aspects of Reasoning about Data, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ilona, J., Chris, M. and Tim, W.:An investigation into the application of neural networks, fuzzy logic, genetic algorithms, and rough sets to automated knowledge acquisition for classification problems, Neurocomputing 24 (1–3)(1999), 37–54.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Brenda, M. and Toshinori, M.:Rule extraction from expert heuristics:A comparative study of rough sets with neural networks and ID3, Eur.J.of Oper.Res.136 (1)(2002), 212–229.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Pawan, L.:Comparison of neofuzzy and rough neural networks, Information Sciences 110 (3–4)(1998), 207–215.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ahn, B.S., Cho, S.S. and Kim, C.Y.:The integrated methodology of rough set theory and artificial neural network for business failure prediction, Expert Systems with Applications 18 (2)(2000), 65–74.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lingras, P.J.:Rough neural networks, Proc.of Sixth InternationalConference on Informa-tion Processing and Management of Uncertainty in Knowledge-Based Systems, Granada, Spain (1996), 1445–1450.

  11. James, D.and Donald, W.:Fuzzy number neural networks, Fuzzy Sets and Systems 108 (1)(1999), 49–58.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Wu, Z.:Research on remote sensing image classi cation using neural network based on rough sets, 2001 InternationalConference on Info-Tech and Info-Net-ICII 2001 1 (2001), 279–284.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ziarko, W.:Variable precision rough set model, J.of Computer and System Sciences 46 (1993), 39–59.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ziarko, W.:Analysis of uncertain information in the framework of variable precision rough sets, Foundations of Computing and Decision Sciences 18 (1993), 381–396.

  15. Beynon, M.:Reducts within the variable precision rough sets model:A further investigation, Eur.J.Oper.Res 134 (3)(2001), 592–605.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Wroblewski, J.:Finding minimal reducts using genetic algorithms, In:P.P. Wang (ed), Proceedings of the InternationalWorkshop on Rough Sets Soft Computing at Second AnnualJoint Conference on Information Sciences(JCIS '95), Wrightsville Beach, NC, pp.186–189, (1995).

  17. Bazan, J.G.:A Comparison of dynamic and non-dynamic rough set methods for extract-ing laws from decision tables, In:L. Polkowski and A.Skowron (eds), Rough Sets in Knowledge Discovery 2:Applications, Case Studies and Software Systems, Physica-Verlag, Heidelberg, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Wangguoyin, Rough Sets Theory and Knowledge Acquisition.Xian:Xian JiaoTong University Publishing Company, 5, 2001.

  19. Hagan, M.T. and Menhaj, M.B.:Training feedforward networks with the Marquardt algorithm, IEEE Trans.on NeuralNetworks 5 (6)(1994), 989–993.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Battiti, R.:First and second order methods for learning:between steepest descent and Newton 's method, NeuralComputation 4 (2)(1992), 141–166.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Fisher, P.F.:Visualization of the Re Liability in classi ed remotely sensed images, Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 7 (1994), 905–910.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Yong, L.Z.:Supervised classi cation of multispectral remote sensing image using B-P neural network, J.Infrared Millim.Waves, No.2 17 (1998).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Liu, H., Tuo, H. & Liu, Y. Rough Neural Network of Variable Precision. Neural Processing Letters 19, 73–87 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:NEPL.0000016851.47914.40

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:NEPL.0000016851.47914.40

Navigation