Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Matthew Effect of the Annual Reviews series and the flow of scientific communication through the World Wide Web

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Authors of the well-regarded Annual Reviews series incorporate URLs to in the text, figures, tables, and reference sections of their articles. Despite the lack of peer review, the number of pointers to scientific information on the World Wide Web in the biomedical and physical science reviews increased five fold between 1997 and 2001. However, only 34% and 76% of the URLs from 1997 and 2001, respectively, remain viable in 2003. This is disconcerting as the stability of the highly cited Annual Reviewsseries is integral to the flow of scientific information. In fact, the citation rate for the URL containing Annual Reviewsarticles was found to be less than half that observed for all the review articles analyzed. Taken together these data suggest that the viability of web information may influence the citation rate of authors who have previously basked in the halo of R. K. Merton's Matthew Effect.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Annual Reviews (2003), Homepage. Available: http://www.annualreviews.org/

  • Aversa, E. S. (1985), Citation patterns of highly cited papers and their relationship to literature aging: A study of the working literature. Scientometrics, 7(3–6): 383-389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, C. M. (2001a), The E-volution of preprints in the scholarly communication of physicists and astronomers. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 52(3):187-200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, C. M. (2001b), The coming of age of E-prints in the literature of physics. Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship, 31(Summer). Available: http://www.istl.org/01-summer/

  • Brown, C. M. (2003a), The role of electronic preprints in chemical communication: Analysis of citation, usage, and acceptance in the journal literature. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54(5): 362-371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, C. M. (2003b), The Changing face of scientific discourse: Analysis of genomic and proteomic database usage and acceptance. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54(10): 926-938.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guttmacher A. E. (2001). Human genetics on the web. Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics, (2): 213-233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hilgartner, S. (1995), Biomolecular databases: New communication regimes for biology? Science Communication, 17(2): 240-263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurd, J. M., Wheeler, A. C., Curtis, K. L. (1992), Information seeking behavior of faculty: Use of indexes and abstracts by scientists and engineers. American Society for Information Science Proceedings, 29: 136-143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Institute For Scientific Information (2003a), Journal Citation Reports. Philadelphia, PA: ISI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Institute For Scientific Information (2003b), Web of Science. Philadelphia, PA: ISI.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, D. W., Roderer, N. K. (1982), Communication in physics-the use of journals. Physics Today (October): 44-47.

  • McCain, K. W. (2000), Sharing digitized research-related information on the World Wide Web. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 51(14): 1321-1327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merton, R. K. (1968), The Matthew Effect in science. Science, 159: 56-63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moed, H. F., Van Leewen, T. H. N., Reedijk, J. (1998), A new classification system to describe the ageing of scientific journals and their impact factors. The Journal of Documentation, 54(4): 387-419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsay, M.-Y. (1999), Library journal use and citation age in medical science. The Journal of Documentation, 55(5): 543-555.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, D. P. (1986), The relationship between journal productivity and obsolescence. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 37(3): 136-145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warr, W. A. (2003), Evaluation of an experimental chemistry preprint server. Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Science, 43: 362-373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weinberg, R. A. (1993), Reflections on the current state of data and reagent exchange among biomedical researchers. In Responsible Science: Ensuring the integrity of the research process, vol. 2, National Academy of Sciences, Committee on Science, Engineering and Public Policy, Panel on Scientific Responsibility and the Conduct of Research, Washington, DC: National Academy, pp. 66-78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Youngen, G. K. (1998), Citation patterns to traditional and electronic preprints in the published literature. College & Research Libraries, 59(5): 448-456.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Library and Information Studies, The University of Oklahoma, 401 W Brooks, Room 120, Norman, OK, 73019-6023, USA

    Cecelia Brown

Authors
  1. Cecelia Brown
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Brown, C. The Matthew Effect of the Annual Reviews series and the flow of scientific communication through the World Wide Web. Scientometrics 60, 25–30 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SCIE.0000027304.80068.0c

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SCIE.0000027304.80068.0c

Keywords

Search

Navigation