Abstract
A new method of classification of biomedical research journals by research level (RL) into clinical or basic, or somewhere in between, is described that updates the system developed by CHI Research Inc. nearly 30 years ago. It is based on counting articles that have one of about 100 “clinical” title words, or one of a similar number of “basic” title words, or both. It allows over 3000 journals in the Science Citation Index (or other databases) to be classified rapidly and transparently, for changes in their research level with time, and for many individual papers in “mixed” journals to be categorised as clinical or basic.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Dawson, G., Lucocq, B., Cottrell, R., Lewison, G. (1998), Mapping the Landscape: National Biomedical Research Outputs 1988–95. London: The Wellcome Trust, Policy Report no 9.
De Bruin, R. H., Moed, H. F. (1993), Delimitation of scientific subfields using cognitive words from corporate addresses in scientific publications, Scientometrics, 40: 423-436.
Lewison, G. (1996), The definition of biomedical research subfields with title keywords and application to the analysis of research outputs, Research Evaluation, 6(2): 25-36.
Lewison, G., Dawson, G. (1998), The effects of funding on the outputs of biomedical research, Scientometrics, 41: 17-27.
Lewison, G. (1999), The definition and calibration of biomedical subfields, Scientometrics, 46: 529-537.
Lewison, G., Devey, M. E. (1999), Bibliometric methods for the evaluation of arthritis research, Rheumatology, 38: 13-20.
Marshakova-Shaikevich, I. (1996), The standard impact factor as an evaluation tool of science fields and scientific journals, Scientometrics, 35: 283-290.
Narin, F., Pinski, G., Gee, H. H. (1976), Structure of the biomedical literature, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 27: 25-45.
Narin, F., Hamilton K. S. (1996), Bibliometric performance measures, Scientometrics, 36: 293-310. See p. 300.
Schwartz, S., Lopez Hellin, J. (1996), Measuring the impact of scientific publications — the case of the biomedical sciences, Scientometrics, 35: 119-132.
Van Hooydonk, G., Gevaert, H., Milis-Proost, G., van de Sompel, H., Debackere, K. (1994), A bibliotheconomic analysis of the impact factors of scientific disciplines, Scientometrics, 30: 65-81.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lewison, G., Paraje, G. The classification of biomedical journals by research level. Scientometrics 60, 145–157 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SCIE.0000027677.79173.b8
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SCIE.0000027677.79173.b8