Abstract
This paper presents qualitative philosophical, sociological, and historical arguments in favor of collaborative research having greater epistemic authority than research performed by individual scientists alone. Quantitatively, epistemic authority is predicted to correlate with citations, both in number, probability of citation, and length of citation history. Data from a preliminary longitudinal study of 33 researchers supports the predicted effects, and, despite the fallacy of asserting the consequent, is taken to confirm the hypothesis that collaborative research does in fact have greater epistemic authority.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Beaver, D. DeB (2001), Reflections on scientific collaboration (and its study): past, present, and future. Scientometrics, 52: 365-377.
Bozeman, B., Lee, S. (2003), The impact of research collaboration on scientific productivity, (a paper presented at the annual meeting of the AAAS, Denver, Colorado, February, 2003, and forthcoming in Research Policy.) Public Release, Georgia Institute of Technology Research News, 16 February, 2003.
Fox, M. F. (1991), Gender, environmental milieu, and productivity in science, In: Zuckerman, H. et al., (Eds), The Outer Circle, New York, W. W. Norton, pp. 188-204.
Harsanyi, M. A. (1993), Multiple authors, multiple problems — bibliometrics and the study of scholarly collaboration: a literature review. Library and Information Science Research, 15: 325-354.
Hughes, T. P. (1989), American Genesis, Penguin Books, New York.
Hull, D. (1988), Science as a Process, Chicago, Univ. of Chicago Press.
Katz, J. S., Martin, B. R. (1997), What is research collaboration? Research Policy, 26: 1-18.
Leydesdorff, L. (2003), Measuring and modeling the knowledge base of innovations, Keynote Address, August 25, 2003, 9th International Conference on Scientometrics and Informetrics, Library of the Chinese Academy of Science, Beijing, China.
Lindsey, D. (1978), The Scientific Publication System in Social Science. San Francisco, Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Narin, F., Stevens, K., Whitlow, E. S. (1991), Scientific co-operation in Europe, and the citation of internationally authored papers. Scientometrics, 21: 313-323.
Ravetz, J. R. (1971), Scientific Knowledge and Its Social Problems, Oxford University Press, New York.
Rousseau, R. (1992) Why am I not cited, or why are multi-authored papers more cited than others? Journal of Documentation, 48(1): 79-80.
Variorum (Eds), The Report of Science at Williams, annual 1967–2003, Williams College, Williamstown, Massachusetts.
Wray, K. Brad (2002), The epistemic significance of collaborative research, Philosophy of Science, 69: 150-168.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Beaver, D.d. Does collaborative research have greater epistemic authority?. Scientometrics 60, 399–408 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SCIE.0000034382.85360.cd
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SCIE.0000034382.85360.cd