Skip to main content
Log in

New classification quality estimators for analysis of documentary information: Application to patent analysis and web mapping

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Abstract

The information analysis process includes a cluster analysis or classification step associated with an expert validation of the results. In this paper, we propose new measures of Recall/Precision for estimating the quality of cluster analysis. These measures derive both from the Galois lattice theory and from the Information Retrieval (IR) domain. As opposed to classical measures of inertia, they present the main advantages to be both independent of the classification method and of the difference between the intrinsic dimension of the data and those of the clusters. We present two experiments on the basis of the MultiSOM model, which is an extension of Kohonen's SOM model, as a cluster analysis method. Our first experiment on patent data shows how our measures can be used to compare viewpoint-oriented classification methods, such as MultiSOM, with global cluster analysis method, such as WebSOM. Our second experiment, which takes part in the EICSTES EEC project, is an original Webometrics experiment that combines content and links classification starting from a large non-homogeneous set of web pages. This experiment highlights the fact that break-even points between our different measures of Recall/Precision can be used to determine an optimal number of clusters for web data classification. The content of the clusters obtained when using different break-even points are compared for determining the quality of the resulting maps.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. M. Barbut, B. Monjardet, Ordre et Classification: Algèbre et Combinatoire, Hachette Université, Paris, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  2. IST-1999-20350.

  3. T. Kohonen, Self-Organizing Maps, Springer Verlag, Berlin, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  4. S. Kaski, T. Honkela, K. Lagus, T. Kohonen, WEBSOM-self organizing maps of document collections, Neurocomputing, 21 (1998) 101-117.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. J. C. Lamirel, Y. Toussaint, C. Francois, X. Polanco, Using artificial neural networks for mapping of science and technology: application to patents analysis, M. Davis, C. S. Wilson (Eds), Proceedings of ISSI 2001, Sydney, Australia, July 2001, pp. 339-353.

  6. J. C. Lamirel, Y. Toussaint, Combining symbolic and numeric techniques for digital libraries contents classification and analysis, Proceedings of First DELOS Network of Excellence Workshop, Zurich, December 2000.

  7. J. C. Lamirel, Application d'une approche symbolico-connexionniste pour la conception d'un système documentaire hautement interactif, Thèse de l'Université de Nancy 1 Henri Poincaré, 1995.

  8. L. Lebart, A. Morineau, J. P. FÉnelon, Traitement des données statistiques, Dunod, Paris, France, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  9. A. Lelu, A. Georgel, Neural models for orthogonal and oblique factor analysis: Towards dynamic data analysis of large sets of highly multidimensional objects, Proceedings of IJCNN, Paris, France, 1990, pp. 829-832.

  10. L. A. Mather, A linear algebra measure of cluster quality, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 51(7) (2000) 602-613.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. M. A. Ould Mahamed Yahya, Comparaison de méthodes neuronales avec des méthodes d'analyse des données dans le cadre d'ingénierie de l'information, Mémoire de stage de D.E.S.S. en “Ingénierie mathématique et outils informatiques”, Centre Elie Cartan, Université de Nancy I, France, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  12. X. Polanco, J. C. Lamirel, C. Francois, Using artificial neural networks for mapping of science and technology: A multi self-organizing maps approach, Scientometrics, 51(1) (2001) 267-292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. S. E. Robertson, K. Sparck-Jones, Relevance weighting of search terms, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 27 (1976) 129-146.

    Google Scholar 

  14. C. Rham (De), La classification hiérarchique ascendante selon la méthode des voisins réciproques, Les cahiers de l'analyse de données, 5(2) (1980) 135-144.

    Google Scholar 

  15. G. Salton, The SMART Retrieval System: Experiments in Automatic Document Processing, Prentice Hall Inc., Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  16. SOM papers, http://www.cis.hut.fi/nnrc/refs/

  17. C. J. Van Rijsbergen, Information Retrieval, Butterworths, London, England, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Web: http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lamirel, JC., Francois, C., Shehabi, S.A. et al. New classification quality estimators for analysis of documentary information: Application to patent analysis and web mapping. Scientometrics 60, 445–562 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SCIE.0000034386.05278.e8

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SCIE.0000034386.05278.e8

Keywords

Navigation