Abstract
Several authors within psychology, neuroscience and philosophy take for granted that standard empirical research techniques are applicable when studying consciousness. In this article, it is discussed whether one of the key methods in cognitive neuroscience – the contrastive analysis – suffers from any serious confounding when applied to the field of consciousness studies; that is to say, if there are any systematic difficulties when studying consciousness with this method that make the results untrustworthy. Through an analysis of theoretical arguments in favour of using contrastive analysis, combined with analyses of empirical findings, I conclude by arguing for three factors that currently are confounding of research using contrastive analysis. These are (1) unconscious processes, (2) introspective reports, and (3) attention.
REFERENCES
Baars, B. J.: 1994, ‘A Thoroughly Empirical Approach to Consciousness’, Psyche 1 (6), 1–18.
Dretske, F. I.: 1995, Naturalizing the Mind, MIT Press.
ffytche, D. H.: 2000, Imaging Conscious Vision, in T. Metzinger (ed.), Neural Correlates of Consciousness, MIT Press.
ffytche, D. H., R. J. Howard, M. J. Brammer, A. David, P. Woodruff and S. Williams: 1998, ‘The Anatomy of Conscious Vision: An fMRI Study of Visual Hallucinations’, Nature Neuroscience 1, 738–742.
Friston, K. J., C. J. Price, P. Fletcher, C. Moore, R. S. Frackowiak, and R. J. Dolan: 1996, ‘The Trouble with Cognitive Subtraction’</del>, Neuroimage 4, 97–104.
Frith, C. D., R. Perry and E. Lumer: 1999: ‘The Neural Correlates of Conscious Experience: An Experimental Framework’, Trends in Cognitive Sciences 3 (3), 105–114.
Haggard, P. and M. Eimer: 1999, ‘On the Relation Between Brain Potentials and the Awareness of Voluntary Movements’, Experimental Brain Research 126, 128–133.
Haggard, P. and E. Magno: 1999, ‘Localising Awareness of Action with Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation’, Experimental Brain Research 127, 102–107.
Jack, A. and A. Roepstorff: 2002, ‘Retrospection and Cognitive Brain Mapping: From Stimulus-Response to Script-Report’, Trends in Cognitive Science, 6 (8), 333–339.
Kentridge, R. W., C. A. Heywood and L. Weiskrantz: 1999, ‘Effects of Temporal Cueing on Residual Visual Discrimination in Blindsight’, Neuropsychologia 37, 479–483.
Kolb, F. C. and J. Braun: 1995, ‘Blindsight in Normal Observers’, Nature 377, 336–338.
Lamme, V. A. F.: 2003, ‘Why Visual Attention and Awareness are Different’, Trends in Cognitive Sciences 7(1), 12–18.
Libet, B.: 1985, ‘Unconscious Cerebral Initiative and the Role of Conscious Will in Voluntary Action’, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 8(4), 529–566.
Libet, B.: 2002, ‘The Timing of Mental Events: Libet's Experimental Findings and Their Implications’, Consciousness & Cognition 11, 291–299.
Mack, A. and I. Rock: 1998, Inattentional Blindness, MIT Press.
Marcel, A.: 1993, ‘Slippage in the Unity of Consciousness’, in R. Bock and J. Marsh (eds), Experimental and Theoretical Studies of Consciousness, John Wiley & Sons.
Merikle, P. M. and M. Daneman: 1998, ‘Psychological investigations of unconscious perception’, Journal of Consciousness Studies 5, 5–18.
Nagel, T.: 1974, ‘What Is It Like to Be a Bat?’ The Philosophical Review LXXXIII, 435–451.
Nisbett, R. C. and T. D. Wilson: 1977, ‘Telling More Than we Can Know: Verbal Reports on Mental Processes’, Psychological Review 84, 231–259.
Overgaard, M.: 2003, ‘Theoretical and Experimental Studies of Consciousness’, Ph.D. thesis, University of Aarhus.
Overgaard, M., O. Kauffmann and T. Z. Ramsøy 2001, ‘Consciousness and Introspection’, Toward a Science of Consciousness, Consciousness Research Abstracts, Journal of Consciousness Studies.
Overgaard, M. and T. A. Sørensen: in press, ‘Introspection Distinct from First Order Experiences’, Journal of Consciousness Studies.
Rosenthal, D. M.: 1997, ‘A theory of Consciousness’, in N. Block, O. Flanagan and G. Güzeldere (eds), The Nature of Consciousness: Philosophical Debates, MIT Press.
Schiff, D., U. Ribary, F. Plum and R. Llinas: 1999, ‘Words Without Mind’, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 6, 650–656.
Tononi, G., R. Srinivasan, P. Russell and G. M. Edelman: 1998, ‘Investigating Neural Correlates of Conscious Perception by Frequency-Tagged Neuromagnetic Responses’, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 95, 3198–3203.
Vaas, R.: (1999), ‘Why Neural Correlates of Consciousness Are Fine But Not Enough’, Anthropology & Philosophy 2 (2), 121–141.
Ward, R. and S. R. Jackson: 2002, ‘Visual Attention in Blindsight: Sensitivity in the Blind Field Increased by Targets in the Sighted Field’, Neuroreport 13, 301–304.
Weiskrantz, L.: 1986, ‘Blindsight’, Oxford University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Overgaard, M. Confounding Factors in Contrastive Analysis. Synthese 141, 217–231 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SYNT.0000043019.64052.e0
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SYNT.0000043019.64052.e0