Skip to main content
Log in

Epistemological Strata and the Rules of Right Reason

  • Published:
Synthese Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

It has been commonplace in epistemology since its inception to idealize away from computational resource constraints, i.e., from the constraints of time and memory. One thought is that a kind of ideal rationality can be specified that ignores the constraints imposed by limited time and memory, and that actual cognitive performance can be seen as an interaction between the norms of ideal rationality and the practicalities of time and memory limitations. But a cornerstone of naturalistic epistemology is that normative assessment is constrained by capacities: you cannot require someone to do something they cannot or, as it is usually put, ought implies can. This much we take to be uncontroversial. We argue that differences in architectures, goals and resources imply substantial differences in capacity, and that some of these differences are ineliminable. It follows that some differences in goals and architectural and computational resources matter at the normative level: they constrain what principles of normative epistemology can be used to describe and prescribe their behavior. As a result, we can expect there to be important epistemic differences between the way brains, individuals, and science work.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Arbib, M. A.: 1981, 'Perceptual Structures and Distributed Motor Control', in V. B. Brooks (ed.), Handbook of Physiology: The Nervous System II. Motor Control, American Physiological Society, Bethesda, Maryland, pp. 1449–1480.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ballard, D. H.: 1991, 'Animate Vision', Artificial Intelligence 48, 57–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calvin, W. H. and G. A. Ojemann: 1994, Conversations with Neil's Brain, Perseus Books, Reading, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N.: 1965,Aspect of the Theory of Syntax, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchland, P. M.: 1979, Scientific Realism and the Plasticity of Mind, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchland, P. M.: 1981, 'Eliminative Materialism and the Propositional Attitudes', The Journal of Philosophy 78, 67–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchland, P. M.: 1989,A Neurocomputational Perspective: The Nature of Mind and the Structure of Science, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchland, P. M.: 1995, The Engine of Reason, the Seat of the Soul: A Philosophical Journey into the Brain, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchland, P. S.: 1986, Neurophilosophy: Toward A Unified Science of the Mind-Brain, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchland, P. S., V.S. Ramachandran and T. J. Sejnowski: 1994, 'A Critique of Pure Vision', in C. Koch and J. Davis (eds.), Large-Scale Neuronal Theories of the Brain, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, A.: 1995, 'Moving Minds: Situating Content in the Service of Real-Time Success', Philosophical Perspectives 9, 89–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, N. J. and H. Eichenbaum: 1997, Memory, Amnesia, and the Hippocampal System, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cosmides, L. and J. Tooby: 1987, 'From Evolution to Behavior: Evolutionary Psychology as the Missing Link', in J. Dupré (ed.), The Latest on the Best, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cosmides, L. and J. Tooby: 1994, 'Origins of Domain Specificity: The Evolution of Func-tional Organization', in L. A. Hirschfield and S. A. Gelman (eds.), Mapping the Mind: Domain Specificity in Cognition and Culture, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cosmides, L. and J. Tooby: 1997, 'The Modular Nature of Human Intelligence', in A. B. Scheibel and J. W. Schoff (eds.), The Origin and Evolution of Intelligence, Jones and Bartlett Publishers, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummins, D. D.: 1995, The Other Side of Psychology, St. Martin's Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummins, D. D. and R. Cummins: 1999, 'Biological Preparedness and Evolutionary Explanation', Cognition 73, B37–B53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummins, R.: 1975, 'Functional Analysis', The Journal of Philosophy 72, 741–765.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummins, R.: 1983, The Nature of Psychological Explanation, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummins, R.: 1989, Meaning and Mental Representation, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummins, R.: 1995, 'Connectionism and the Rationale Constraint on Cognitive Explana-tions', Philosophical Perspectives 9, 105–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummins, R.: 1996, Representations, Targets, and Attitudes, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummins, R., J. Blackmon, D. Byrd, P. Poirier, M. Roth and G. Schwarz: 2001, 'Sys-tematicity and the Cognition of Structured Domains', The Journal of Philosophy 98, 167–185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummins, R. and D. D. Cummins: 2000, 'Introduction to Part 1', in R. Cummins and D. D. Cummins (eds.), Minds, Brains, and Computers: The Foundations of Cognitive Science, an Anthology, Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dempser, F.: 1981, 'Memory Span: Sources of Individual and Developmental Differences', Psychological Bulletin 89, 63–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennett, D. C.: 1969, Content and Consciousness, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennett, D. C.: 1978, Brainstorms: Philosophical Essays on Mind and Psychology, Bradford Books, Montgomery, VT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dreyfus, H.: 1979, What Computers Still Can't Do, Harper and Row, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elman, J. L.: 1993, 'Learning and Development in Neural Networks: The Importance of Starting Small', Cognition 48, 71–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elman, J. L., E. Bates, M. H. Johnson, A. Karmiloff-Smith, D. Parisi and K. Plunkett: 1996, Rethinking Innateness, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fodor, J. A.: 1968, 'The Appeal to Tacit Knowledge in Psychological Explanation', The Journal of Philosophy 65, 627–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fodor, J. A.: 1975, The Language of Thought, Crowell, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fodor, J. A.: 1983, The Modularity of Mind: An Essay in Faculty Psychology, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fodor, J. A.: 2000, The Mind Doesn't Work That Way: The Scope and Limits of Computational Psychology, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fodor, J. A. and Z. W. Pylyshyn: 1988, 'Connectionism and Cognitive Architecture', Cognition 28, 3–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galaburda, A. M. and M. Livingstone: 1993, 'Evidence of a Magnocellular Defect in Neurodevelopmental Dyslexia', Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 682, 70–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galison, P.: 1987, How Experiments End, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giere, R.: 1988, Explaining Science: A Cognitive Approach, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldman, A. I.: 1999, Knowledge in a Social World, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldowsky, B. and E. L. Newport: 1990, 'The Less is More Hypothesis:Modeling the Effect of Processing Constraints on Language Learnability', unpublished manuscript, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gopnik, A. and A. N. Meltzoff: 1997, Words, Thoughts, and Theories, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanson, N. R.: 1958, Patterns of Discovery, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haugeland, J.: 1985, Artificial Intelligence: The Very Idea, MIT Press/Bradford Books, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haugeland, J.: 1991, 'Representational Genera', in W. Ramsey, S. Stich and D. Rumelhart (eds.), Philosophy and Connectionist Theory, Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helmholtz, H. von: 1866, Treatise on Physiological Optics, 3rd edn., in J. P. C. Southall (trans.). Opt. Soc. Amer. New York, 1924. Dover reprint 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirshfield, L. A. and S. A. Gelman (eds.): 1994, Mapping the Mind: Domain Specificity in Cognition and Culture, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hume, D.: 1739, A Treatise of Human Nature, 2nd edn., in L. A. Selby-Bigge and P. H. Nidditch (eds.), Oxford University Press, Oxford 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchins, E.: 1995a, Cognition in the Wild, MIT Press/Bradford Books, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchins, E.: 1995b, 'How a Cockpit Remembers its Speed', Cognitive Science 19, 265–288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D. and A. Tversky: 1973, 'On the Psychology of Prediction', Psychological Review 80, 237–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitcher, P. S.: 1996, 'From Neurophilosophy to Neurocomputation: Searching the Cognit-ive Forest', in R. N. McCauley (ed.), The Churchlands and their Critics, Basil Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T.: 1962, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • McClelland, J. L., B. L. McNaughton and R. C. O'Reilly: 1995, 'Why there are Comple-mentary Learning Systems in the Hippocampus and Neocortex: Insights from the Suc-cesses and Failures pf Connectionist Models of Learning and Memory', Psychological Review 102, 419–457.

    Google Scholar 

  • McClelland, J. L. and D. E. Rumelhart: 1988, Explorations in Parallel Distributed Pro-cessing: A Handbook of Models, Programs, and Exercises, MIT Press/Bradford Books, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCloskey, M. and N. J. Cohen: 1989, 'Catastrophic Interference in Connectionist Net-works: The Sequential Leaning Problem', The Psychology of Learning and Motivation 24, 109–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merleau-Ponty, M.: 1945, Phénoménologie de la perception, Gallimard, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Millikan, R. G.: 1995, 'Pushmi-Pullyou Representations', Philosophical Perspectives 9, 185–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newell, A., H. A. Simon and J. C. Shaw: 1958, 'Elements of a Theory of Human Solving', Psychological Review 65, 151–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newport, E. L.: 1990, 'Maturational Constraints on Language Learning', Cognitive Science 14, 11–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nisbett, R. and L. Ross: 1980, Human Inference, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka, I. and H. Takeuchi: 1995, The Knowledge-Creating Company, Oxford University Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Regan, K. and A. Noë: 2001, 'A Sensorimotor Account of Vision and Visual Conscious-ness', Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24, 939-173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinker, S.: 1997, How the Mind Works, Norton, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poirier, P., R. Cummins, J. Blackmon, D. Byrd, M. Roth and G. Schwarz: 1999, 'The Epistemology of Non-Symbolic Cognition: Atomistic Learning and Forgetting', Tech. Report Phil99-3, University of California-Davis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollock, J.: 1989, How to Build a Person: A Prolegomenon, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, Hilary: 1962, 'The Analytic and the Synthetic', in H. Feigl and G. Maxwell (eds.), Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. III, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, pp. 350–397.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samuels, R.: 1998, 'Evolutionary Psychology and the Massive Modularity Hypothesis', British Journal of Philosophy of Science 49, 575–602.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tallal, P., S. L. Miller, W. M. Jenkins and M. M. Merzenich: 1997, 'The Role of Tem-poral Processing in Developmental Language-Based Learning Disorders: Research and Clinical Implications', in B. Blachman (ed.), Foundations of Reading Acquisition and Dyslexia: Implications for Early Intervention, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, New Jersey, pp. 49–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teller, P.: 2001, 'Twilight of the Perfect Model Model', Erkenntnis 55(3), 393–415

    Google Scholar 

  • Tooby, J. and L. Cosmides: 1992, 'The Psychological Foundations of Culture', in J. Barkow, L. Cosmides and J. Tooby (eds.), The Adapted Mind: Evolutionary Psychology and the Generation of Culture, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wimsatt, W. C.: 1986, 'Forms of Aggregativity', in A. Donagan, N. Perovich and M. Wedin (eds.), Human Nature and Natural Knowledge, D. Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cummins, R., Poirier, P. & Roth, M. Epistemological Strata and the Rules of Right Reason. Synthese 141, 287–331 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SYNT.0000044992.91717.aa

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SYNT.0000044992.91717.aa

Keywords

Navigation