How Socially Relevant Visual Characteristics of Avatars Influence Impression Formation
Abstract
Like in the real world, the first impression a person leaves in a computer-mediated environment depends on his or her online appearance. The present study manipulates an avatar’s pupil size, eyeblink frequency, and the viewing angle to investigate whether nonverbal visual characteristics are responsible for the impression made. We assessed how participants (N = 56) evaluate these avatars in terms of different attributes. The findings show that avatars with large pupils and slow eye blink frequency are perceived as more sociable and more attractive. Compared to avatars seen in full frontal view or from above, avatars seen from below were rated as most sociable, self-confident, and attractive. Moreover, avatars’ pupil size and eyeblink frequency escape the viewer’s conscious perception but still influence how people evaluate them. The findings have wide-ranging applied implications for avatar design.
References
(2008). First impressions. New York: Guilford.
(2002). The digital divide: Status differences in virtual environments. In , Social life of avatars: Presence and interaction in shared virtual environments (pp. 188–204). New York: Springer.
(2004). Avatars. In , Encyclopedia of human-computer interaction (pp. 64–68). Great Barrington, MA: Berkshire Publishing Group.
(2007). The scientific research potential of virtual worlds. Science, 317, 472–476.
(1977). Sexism and ‘beautyism’ in personnel consultant decision making. Journal of Applied Psychology, 62, 301–310.
(2008). Human amygdala sensitivity to the pupil size of others. Cerebral Cortex, 18(12), 2729–34.
(2007). Virtually trustworthy. Science, 317, 53–54.
(1999). Die Macht des Bildes. Der Einfluss der nonverbalen Kommunikation auf Kultur und Politik [
The power of images. The impact of nonverbal communication on culture and politics ]. Bern: Huber.(2004). Embodiment and copresence in collaborative interfaces. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 61, 453–480.
(2005). Nonverbal behavior and the vertical dimension of social relations: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 131, 898–924.
(1997). Trait inferences based on racial and behavioral cues. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 19(1), 33–48.
(1965). Attitude and pupil size. Scientific American, 212, 46–54.
(2001). Facial symmetry and judgments of apparent health: Support for a “good genes” explanation of the attractiveness-symmetry relationship. Evolution and Human Behavior, 22, 417–429.
(1974). Little jiffy mark IV. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 34, 111–117.
(1986). The influences of changes in camera perspective on the perception of a speaker. Communication, 12(2), 38–43.
(1990). The impact of camera perspectives on the perception of a speaker. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 16, 133–156.
(2002). Individual differences in judgmental tendencies derived from first impressions. Personality and Individual Differences, 33, 131–145.
(1994). Glaubwürdigkeit. Untersuchungen zu einem psychologischen Konstrukt [
Credibility. Investigations addressing a psychological construct ]. Weinheim: Beltz.(2007). Women’s pupillary responses to sexually significant others during the hormonal cycle. Hormones and Behavior, 52, 520–530.
(1993). Von Angesicht zu Angesicht. Was Gesichter verraten und was sie verbergen [
Face-to-face. What faces tell and what they hide ]. Heidelberg: Spektrum.(2007). Preferences for symmetry in faces change across the menstrual cycle. Biological Psychology, 76, 209–216.
(2008). Emotional expression modulates perceived gaze direction. Emotion, 8, 573–577.
(1988). Interpersonal similarity and the social and intellectual dimensions or first impressions. Social Cognition, 6, 269–286.
(2007). The promise of parallel universes. Science, 317, 1341–1343.
(2007). Orbitofrontal cortex and amygdala contributions to affect and action in primates. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1121, 273–296.
(2008). Choose your “buddy icon” carefully: The influence of avatar androgyny, anthropomorphism and credibility in online interactions. Computers in Human Behavior, 24, 1473–1493.
(1986). Impression formation: The role of expressive behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 421–427.
(2002). Social interaction in virtual environments: Key issues, common themes, and a framework for research. In , The social life of avatars (pp. 1–18). London: Springer-Verlag.
(1992). Über Fotographie [
About photography ]. Frankfurt a. M.: Fischer.(2004). Sympathetic and parasympathetic innervation of pupillary dilation during sustained processing. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 52, 77–86.
(1993). Perceptions of power: First impressions of a woman wearing a jacket. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 76(1), 339–348.
(2004). Pupillometry: A sexual selection approach. Evolution and Human Behavior, 25, 221–228.
(2009). Me myself and I: The role of interactional context on self-presentation through avatars. Computers in Human Behavior, 25, 510–520.
(2008). How gender and age affect newscasters’ credibility. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 52, 466–484.
(1972). Nonverbal behavior and non verbal communication. Psychological Review, 79, 185–213.
(2007). The Proteus effect: The effect of transformed self-representation on behavior. Human Communication Research, 33, 271–290.
(2007). The unbearable likeness of being digital: The persistence of nonverbal social norms in online virtual environments. CyberPsychology and Behavior, 10(1), 115–121.
. (1991). Declaration of Helsinki. Law, Medicine and Health Care, 19, 264–265.
(2002). Perception and imaging (2nd ed.). Boston, MA: Focal Press.
