Skip to main content
Original Article

Personal Relevance Versus Contextual Relevance

The Role of Relevant Ads in Personalized Websites

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-1105/a000067

Personalization, or the tailoring of content to meet users’ unique needs, is considered a desirable feature of digital media, particularly websites, because it results in content that is highly relevant to the user. However, it is not always possible to provide personally relevant content. Under such circumstances, the best that a system can do is provide contextually relevant peripheral content (e.g., ads) based on the topic of the main content (e.g., search-engine output). This raises an important question: Does context relevance have the same positive effects on user perceptions of websites as personal relevance? If context relevance can indeed make up for the lack of personalization, then boosting it via ad content on the site should serve to enhance appeal even when the main content is not personalized. Using a 2 × 2 factorial experiment (N = 60), we investigated whether perceptions of a website and the ads themselves varied as a function of the presence of personalized site content and ad relevance to website context. Results indicate that personal relevance and context relevance are fungible in contributing to user attitudes toward the site. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed.

References

  • Alpert, S. R. , Karat, J. , Karat, C. M. , Brodie, C. , Vergo, J. G. (2003). User attitudes regarding a user-adaptive e-commerce web site. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 13, 373–396. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ansari, A. , Mela, C. F. (2003). E-customization. Journal of Marketing Research, 40, 131–145. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bakker, A. B. (1999). Persuasive communication about AIDS prevention: Need for cognition determines the impact of message format. AIDS Education and Prevention, 11(2), 150–162. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Beier, J. , Kalyanaraman, S. (2008). The psychological appeal of “MyNews.com”: The interplay between customization and recommendation sources in news websites. Paper presented at the 58th annual conference of the International Communication Association, Montreal, Canada, May 2008. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Berghel, H. , Berleant, D. , Foy, T. , McGuire, M. (1999). Cyberbrowsing: Information customization on the web. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50, 505–513. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Blom, J. (2000). Personalization – a taxonomy. Extended abstracts of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. New York: ACM. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • BURST! Media . (2002, July 1). Ad clutter. Retrieved from www.burstmedia.com/pdf/2002_07_01.pdf First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Calve, M. G. , Castilo, M. D. , Estevez, A. (1999). On-line predictive inferences in reading: Processing time during versus after the priming context. Memory & Cognition, 27(5), 834–843. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Cho, C. , Cheon, H. J. (2004). Why do people avoid advertising on the internet? Journal of Advertising, 33(4), 89–97. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Cho, C. H. (1999). How advertising works on the WWW: Modified elaboration likelihood model. Journal of Current Issues and Research in Advertising, 21(1), 33–50. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Coulter, R. A. , Zaltman, G. , Coulter, K. S. (2001). Interpreting consumer perceptions of advertising: An application of the Zaltman metaphor elicitation technique. Journal of Advertising, 30(4), 1–21. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • De Pelsmacker, P. , Geuens, M. , Anckaert, P. (2002). Media context and advertising effectiveness: The role of context appreciation and context/ad similarity. Journal of Advertising, 31(2), 49–61. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Edwards, S. M. , Li, H. , Lee, J. (2002). Forced exposure and psychological reactance: Antecedents and consequences of the perceived intrusiveness of pop-up ads. Journal of Advertising, 31(3), 83–95. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Erdley, C. A. , D’Agostino, P. R. (1988). Cognitive and affective components of automatic priming effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(5), 741–747. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Furnham, A. , Gunter, B. , Richardson, F. (2002). Effects of product-program congruity and viewer involvement on memory for televised advertisements. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32(1), 124–141. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Gilmore, J. H. , Pine, B. J. II (2000). Introduction: Customization that counts. In J. H. Gilmore, B. J. Pine, II (Eds.), Markets of one: Creating customer-unique value through mass customization (pp. vii–xxv). Boston: Harvard Business School Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Goldsmith, R. E. , Lafferty, B. A. (2002). Consumer response to web sites and their influence on advertising effectiveness. Internet Research, 12(4), 318–327. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Grier, S. A. , Brumbaugh, A. M. (1999). Noticing cultural differences: Ad meanings created by target and non targets. Journal of Advertising, 28(1), 79–93. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ho, S. Y. , Tam, Y. K. (2005). An empirical examination of the effects of web personalization at different stages of decision making. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 19(1), 95–112. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Higgins, E. T. , Bargh, J. A. , Lombardi, W. (1985). Nature of priming effects on categorization. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 11(1), 59–69. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Jeong, Y. , King, C. M. (2005). Impacts of website context relevance on banner advertisement effectiveness. Paper presented at the 55th annual conference of the International Communication Association, New York, USA. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Kamins, M. A. (1990). An investigation into the ‘match-up’ hypothesis in celebrity advertising: When beauty may be only skin deep. Journal of Advertising, 19(1), 4–13. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Kalyanaraman, S. (2008). The interplay between customization and cognition in Web portals: The multiple-role hypothesis explanation. Unpublished manuscript, University of North Carolina. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Kalyanaraman, S. , Sundar, S. S. (2006). The psychological appeal of personalized content in web portals: Does customization affect attitude and behavior? Journal of Communication, 56(1), 110–132. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kalyanaraman, S. , Sundar, S. S. (2008). Portrait of the portal as a metaphor: Explicating Web portals for communication research. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 85(2), 239–256. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kanungo, R. N. , Pang, S. (1973). Effects of human models on perceived product quality. Journal of Advertising Psychology, 57(2), 172–178. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Kreuter, M. W. , Wray, R. J. (2003). Tailored and targeted health communication: Strategies for enhancing information relevance. American Journal of Health Behavior, 27(3), 227–232. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lavidge, J. R. (1999). “Mass customization” is not an oxymoron. Journal of Advertising Research, 39(4), 70–72. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Lee, Y. H. , Mason, C. (1999). Responses to information incongruency in advertising: The role of expectancy, relevancy and humor. Journal of Consumer Research, 26(2), 156–170. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Little, J. R. (2001). A librarian’s perspective on portals. EDUCAUSE Quarterly, 36(2), 52–54. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Lynch, J. , Schuler, D. (1994). The match-up effect of spokesperson and product congruency: A schema theory interpretation. Psychology and Marketing, 11(5), 417–445. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • MacInnis, D. J. , Jaworski, B. J. (1989). Information processing from advertisements: Toward an interactive framework. Journal of Marketing, 53, 1–23. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Mandler, G. (1982). The structure of value: Accounting for taste. In M. S. Clark, S. T. Fisk, (Eds.), Affect and cognition: The 17th Annual Carnegie Symposium (pp. 203–230). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Mobasher, B. , Dai, H. , Luo, T. , Sung, Y. , Zhu, J. (2000). Integrating web usage and content mining for more effective personalization. In K. Bauknecht, S. K. Madria, G. Pernul, (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Conference on E-Commerce and Web Technologies (pp. 165–176). New York: Springer. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Moore, R. S. , Stammerjohan, C. A. , Coulter, R. A. (2005). Banner advertiser-web site context congruity and color effects on attention and attitudes. Journal of Advertising, 34(2), 71–84. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Mostafa, J. (2002). Information customization. Intelligent Systems. IEEE, 17(6), 8–11. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Petty, R. E. , Barden, J. , & Wheeler, S. C. (2002). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion: Health promotions that yield sustained behavioral change. In R. J. DiClemente, R. A. Crosby, M. Kegler, (Eds.), Emerging theories in health promotion practice and research (pp. 71–99). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Skinner, C. S. , Campbell, M. K. , Rimer, B. K. , Curry, S. , Prochaska, J. O. (1999). How effective is tailored print communication? Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 21, 290–298. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Srull, T. K. , Lichtenstein, M. , Rothbart, M. (1985). Associative storage and retrieval processes in person memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 11, 316–345. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Sundar, S. S. , Kalyanaraman, S. (2004). Arousal, memory, and impression-formation effects of animation speed in Web advertising. Journal of Advertising, 33(1), 7–17. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Sundar, S. S. , Marathe, S. S. (2010). Personalization vs customization: The importance of agency, privacy and power usage. Human Communication Research, 36, 298–322. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Swann, W. B. Jr. , Milton, L. P. , Polzer, J. T. (2000). Should we create a niche or fall in line? Identity negotiation and small group effectiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 238–250. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Yi, Y. (1993). Contextual priming effects in print advertisements: The moderating role of prior knowledge. Journal of Advertising, 22(1), 1–11. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Wyer, R. S. Jr. , Srull, T. K. (1981). Category accessibility: Some theoretical and empirical issues concerning the processing of social stimulus information. In E. T. Higgins, C. P. Herman, M. P. Zanna, (Eds.), Social Cognition: The Ontario Symposium (pp. 161–197). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Xia, L. , Sudharshan, D. (2002). Effects of interruptions on consumer online decision processes. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 12(3), 265–280. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar