Effects of News Frames on Recipients’ Information Processing in Disability Sports Communications
Abstract
The international media coverage of disability sports displays diverse quantitative and qualitative shortcomings and shows that disability sports issues are frequently framed in unfavorable and negative ways. This study explores the effects of (valenced) issue-specific news frames in a disability sports communication. In an experimental study (between-subjects design), 90 participants were randomly assigned to three groups. Participants read a sports news article about the situation in disability sports prior to the 2012 Paralympic Games with a frame that either saliently focused on the athletic performance in disability sports (Group 1), or the fate and (financial) dependency on public support of disability sports (Group 2), or both (mixed frame; Group 3). Participants’ importance considerations regarding specific aspects in disability sports, as well as their attitudes toward a portrayed athlete with a disability were measured. The findings showed a significant impact of the applied frames on participants’ importance considerations and attitudes.
References
1990). Value-framing abortion in the United States: An application of media system dependency theory. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 2(3), 249–273.
(1993). The effect of prior experience in a rehabilitation setting on students’ attitudes toward the disabled. Rehabilitation Nursing, 18(2), 95–98.
(2002). Framing, value words, and citizens’ explanations of their issue opinions. Political Communication, 19(3), 303–316.
(2003). Values, political knowledge, and public opinion about gay rights: A framing-based account. Public Opinion Quarterly, 67, 173–201.
(2010). Framing gender and disability: Cross-cultural analysis of photographs from the 2008 Paralympic Games. International Journal of Sport Communication, 3(3), 308–321.
(2007a). A theory of framing and opinion formation in competitive elite environments. Journal of Communication, 57(1), 99–118.
(2007b). Framing public opinion in competitive democracies. American Political Science Review, 101(4), 637–655.
(1994). Disability coverage in American newspapers. In , The disabled, the media, and the information age (pp. 1–17). Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
(1985). Einstellung und Verhalten gegenüber Behinderten
([Attitude and behavior toward the disabled] . Berlin: Marhold.2007). Soziologie der Behinderten. Eine Einfüh-rung
([Sociology of the disabled. An introduction] . Heidelberg: Winter.2010). Discourses of the “too abled”: Contested body hierarchies and the Oscar Pistorius case. International Journal of Sport Communication, 3(3), 288–307.
(1992). The European Sport Charta. Retrieved from www.coe.int/t/dg4/sport/sportineurope/charter_en.asp
. (1992). Images of disability on television. New York: Routledge.
(1995). Disability and sport. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
(2003). Valenced news frames and public support for the EU. Communications, 28(4), 361–381.
(2011). (In)direct framing effects: The effects of news media framing on public support for Turkish membership in the European Union. Communication Research, 38(2), 179–205.
(2001). Framing politics at the launch of the Euro: A cross-national comparative study of frames in the news. Political Communication, 18(2), 107–122.
(2001). On the limits of framing effects: who can frame? Journal of Politics, 63(4), 1041–1066.
(2004). Political preference formation: Competition, deliberation, and the (ir)relevance of framing effects. American Political Science Review, 98(4), 671–686.
(2007). Wanted dead or alive: Media frames, frame adoption, and support for the war in Afghanistan. Journal of Communication, 57(1), 119–141.
(1993). Framing: Towards clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51–58.
(1999). Validation of the factor structure of the Interactions With Disabled Persons Scale. Australian Journal of Psychology, 51(1), 50–55.
(1999). Newspaper coverage of people with disabilities in Canada and Israel: An international comparison. Disability & Society, 14(6), 709–731.
(2000). How the news frames disability: Print media coverage of the Americans with disabilities act. In , Expanding the scope of social science research on disability (pp. 55–83). Bingley, UK: Emerald.
(2006). Are disability images in advertising becoming bold and daring? An analysis of prominent themes in US and UK campaigns. Disability Studies Quarterly, 26(3), Retrieved from www.dsq-sds.org
(2008). Elite wheelchair athletes relate to sport media. In , The Paralympic Games. Empowerment or side show? (pp. 25–33). Maidenhead, UK: Meyer & Meyer.
(2009). Moderating effect of group cue while processing news on immigration. Is the framing effect a heuristic process? Journal of Communication, 59(4), 726–749.
(2011). Cognitive, attitudinal, and emotional effects of news frame and group cues, on processing news about immigration. Journal of Media Psychology, 23(4), 174–185.
(2011). Paralympic games. Retrieved from www.paralympic.org/Paralympic_Games/
. (1991). Is anyone responsible? How television frames political issues. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
(2004). Supercrips versus the pitiful handicapped: Reception of disabling images by disabled audience members. Communications: The European Journal of Communication Research, 29(4), 447–466.
(2011). Getting real: The duration of framing effects. Journal of Communication, 61(5), 959–983.
(2012, May). Framing effects over time: Comparing affective and cognitive news frames. Paper presented at the 2012 annual conference of the International Communication Association (ICA), Phoenix, Arizona.
(2009). Issue importance as a moderator of framing effects. Communication Research, 36(3), 400–425.
(1996). Effects of contact on children’s attitudes toward disability: A longitudinal study. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 26(23), 2113–2134.
(2007). Beyond accessibility? Toward an on-line and memory-based model of framing effects. Communications: The European Journal of Communication Research, 32(1), 51–78.
(2009). Implicit associations as a barrier to the interaction with disabled persons. In , Technologienutzung ohne Barrieren. Zusammenfassung der Beiträge zum Usability Day VII
([Technology utilization without barriers. Proceedings of the Usability Day VII] (pp. 75–84). Berlin, Germany: Pabst Science Publishers.1994). Broken images: Portrayals of those with disabilities in American media. In , The disabled, the media, and the information age (pp. 1–17). Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
(1997). Media framing of a civil liberty conflict and its effects on tolerance. American Political Science Review, 91(3), 567–583.
(1984). Handicapism and sport: New directions for sport sociology research. In , Sport and the sociological imagination (pp. 162–176). Fort Worth, TX: Texas Christian University Press.
(2005). Framing public discussion of gay civil unions. Public Opinion Quarterly, 69(2), 179–212.
(1997). News values and public opinion: A theoretical account of media priming and framing. In , Progress in communication sciences: Advances in persuasion (Vol. 13, pp. 173–212). Greenwich, CT: Ablex.
(1997). Switching trains of thought. The impact of news frames on readers’ cognitive responses. Communication Research, 24(5), 481–506.
(2006). A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(5), 751–783.
(1999). Coping strategies of Paralympic athletes. 12 Congreso Mundial de Actividad Fisica Adaptada – COMAFA ’99, 4–8 de Mayo de 1999 Barcelona – Lleida. Resumenes. Barcelona, Spain: Institut Nacional d’educació Física de Catalunya, 95–96.
(2001). An ideal misconstrued: Newspaper coverage of the Atlanta Paralympic Games in France and Germany. Sociology of Sport Journal, 18(1), 69–94.
(1999). A content analysis of CBS’s coverage of the 1996 Paralympic Games. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 16(1), 27–47.
(1999). Framing as a theory of media effects. Journal of Communication, 49(1), 103–120.
(2000). Agenda-setting, priming and framing revisited: Another look at cognitive effects of political communication. Mass Communication and Society, 3(2–3), 297–316.
(2004). Ästhetisierung als produktpolitisches Instrument medial vermittelten Sports
([Esthetics as a product policy instrument of mediated sports] . In , Die Visualisierung des Sports in den Medien (pp. 135–163). Cologne, Germany: Halem.2010). Presse und Behinderung. Eine qualitative und quantitative Untersuchung
([Print media and disability. A qualitative and quantitative analysis] . Wiesbaden: VS Verlag.2001). Value hierarchies across cultures. Taking a similarities perspective. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 32(3), 268–290.
(1996). “To thine own self be true”: Values, framing, and voter decision-making strategies. Communication Research, 23(5), 509–561.
(2001). The effects of value-framing on political judgement and reasoning. In , Framing public life: Perspectives on media and our understanding of the social world (pp. 227–243). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
(2005). Economic individualism, humanitarianism, and welfare reform: A value-based account of framing effects. Journal of Communication, 55, 795–809.
(2005). The inclusion of elite athletes with disabilities in the 2002 Manchester Commonwealth Games: An exploratory analysis of British newspaper coverage. Sport. Education and Society, 10(1), 49–67.
(2004). The structure of political argument and the logic of issue framing. In , Studies in public opinion (pp. 133–165). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
(2002). Medical students’ attitudes toward persons with disability: A comparative study. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 83(11), 1537–1542.
(2003). ‘Pre-occupied with able-bodiedness?’ An analysis of the British media coverage of the 2000 Paralympic Games. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 20(2), 166–181.
(2009). Challenging the frame in the news: The role of issue involvement, attitude, and competing frames. Journal of Media Psychology, 21(4), 161–170.
(2011, July). Sports communication & disability: Media framing and effects on recipients’ perception and evaluation of persons with disability. Paper presented at the IAMCR (International Association for Media and Communication Research) Conference, Istanbul, Turkey.
(2012). Visual news framing and effects on recipients’ attitudes toward athletes with physical disabilities. International Journal of Sport Communication, 5(1), 69–86.
(1995). Working knowledge and attitude strength: An information-processing analysis. In , Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences (pp. 283–313). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
(1986). Research with the Attitudes Towards Disabled Persons Scale (ATDP) 1960–1985. Hempstead, NY: Hofstra University.
(