Poster + Paper
3 April 2023 Comparison of radiologists’ interpretation efficiency with radiographs: standard 6 MP versus 12 MP high-resolution display monitors
Author Affiliations +
Conference Poster
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to compare interpretation efficiency of radiologists reading radiographs on 6 megapixel (MP) vs 12 MP monitors. Our method compares two sets of monitors in two phases: in phase I, radiologists interpreted using a 6MP, 30.4 inch (Barco Coronis Fusion) and in phase II, a 12MP, 30.9-inch (Barco Nio Fusion) is used. Nine chest and three musculoskeletal radiologists each batch-interpreted an average of 115 radiographs in phase I and 115 radiographs in phase II as part of routine clinical work. Radiologists were blinded to monitor resolution. Interpretation times per radiograph was noted from dictation logs. We found that interpretation was faster on 12 MP monitor by 6.88 (p = 0.002) and 6.76 seconds (8.7%) (p < 0.001) for chest radiographs only and combined chest and musculoskeletal radiographs, respectively. When evaluating musculoskeletal radiographs alone, the improvement in reading times with 12 MP monitor was 6.76 seconds (p = 0.111). Interpretation of radiographs on 12 MP monitors was ~8.7% faster than on 6 MP monitors.
© (2023) COPYRIGHT Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE). Downloading of the abstract is permitted for personal use only.
Mostafa Abozeed, Tom Kimpe, Seth Lirette, and Srini Tridandapani "Comparison of radiologists’ interpretation efficiency with radiographs: standard 6 MP versus 12 MP high-resolution display monitors", Proc. SPIE 12467, Medical Imaging 2023: Image Perception, Observer Performance, and Technology Assessment, 124670Z (3 April 2023); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2652954
Advertisement
Advertisement
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission  Get copyright permission on Copyright Marketplace
KEYWORDS
Radiography

Chest

Diagnostics

Chest imaging

Image resolution

Radiology

Digital imaging

Back to Top