Skip to main content
Log in

Axiomatics for power indices in the weighted games

  • Control Sciences
  • Published:
Automation and Remote Control Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper demonstrates that most existing voting schemes represent or can be rewritten as weighted games. However, axiomatics for power indices defined on simple games are not directly applied to weighted games, since related operations become ill-posed. The author shows that the majority of axiomatics can be adapted to weighted games. Finally, a series of examples are provided.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Dubey, P., On the Uniqueness of the Shapley Value, Int. J. Game Theory, 1975, vol. 4, pp. 131–139.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Shapley, L.S. and Shubik, M., A Method for Evaluating the Distribution of Power in a Committee System, Am. Polit. Sci. Rev., 1954, vol. 48(3), pp. 787–792.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Dubey, P. and Shapley, L.S., Mathemaical Properties of the Banzhaf Power Index, Math. Oper. Res., 1979, vol. 4, pp. 99–131.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Banzhaf, J.F., Weighted Voting Doesn’t Work: A Mathematical Analysis, Rutgers Law Rev., 1965, vol. 19, pp. 317–343.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Laruelle, A. and Valenciano, F., Shapley-Shubik and Banzhaf Indices Revisited, Math. Oper. Res., 2000, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 89–104.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Lehrer, E., An Axiomatizaton of the Banzhaf Value, Int. J. Game Theory, 1988, vol. 17, pp. 88–99.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Nowak, A.S., An Axiomatizaton of the Banzhaf Value without the Additivity Axiom, Int. J. Game Theory, 1997, vol. 26, pp. 137–141.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Shvarts, D.A., Axiomatics for Power Indices that Account for Player Preferences, Autom. Remote Control, 2010, vol.71, no. 1, pp. 128–141.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Aleskerov, F.T., Power Indices That Account for Coalition Preferences of the Participants, Dokl. Akad. Nauk, 2007, vol. 414, no. 5, pp. 594–597.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Batsyn, M.V. and Kalyagin, V.A., Ob aksiomaticheskom opredelenii obshchikh indeksov vliyaniya v zadache golosovaniya s kvotoi (On the Axiomatization of Total Power Indices in the Weighted Games), Moscow: Vysshaya Shkola Ekonomiki, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Taylor, A.D. and Zwicker, W.S., Simple Games, Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press, 1999.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Roberts, F.S., Discrete Mathematical Models with Application to Social, Biological and Environmental Problems, Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, 1976. Translated under the title Diskretnye matematicheskie modeli s prilozheniyami k sotsial’nym, biologicheskim i ekologicheskim zadacham, Moscow: Nauka, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Penrose, L.S., Elementary Statistics of Majority Voting, J. Royal Statict. Soc., 1946, vol. 109, pp. 53–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Johnston, R.J., On the Measurement of Power: Some Reactions to Laver, Environ. Plan., 1978, vol. 10, pp. 907–914.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Shvarts, D.A., On Calculation of the Power Indices with Allowance for the Agent Preferences, Autom. Remote Control, 2009, vol. 70, no. 3, pp. 484–490.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Deegan, J. and Packel, E.W., A New Index of Power for Simple n-Person Games, Int. J. Game Theory, 1978, vol. 7(2), pp. 113–123.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Holler, M.J. and Packel, E.W., Power, Luck and the Right Index, J. Econom., 1983, vol. 43, pp. 21–29.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. A. Shvarts.

Additional information

Original Russian Text © D.A. Shvarts, 2012, published in Problemy Upravleniya, 2012, No. 1, pp. 33–41.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shvarts, D.A. Axiomatics for power indices in the weighted games. Autom Remote Control 76, 708–720 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0005117915040141

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0005117915040141

Keywords

Navigation