Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Limiting zeros of sampled systems with time delay

  • Linear Systems
  • Published:
Automation and Remote Control Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We consider the problem of asymptotic analysis of the zeros of a sampled system of a linear time-invariant continuous system as the sampling period decreases. We show that for a continuous prototype system with delay the limits of a part of the model’s zeros are roots of certain polynomials whose coefficients are determined by the relative order of the prototype system and delay. In the special case of zero delay these polynomials coincide with Euler polynomials. Zeros of these generalized Euler polynomials are localized: we show that they are all simple and negative, and that they move monotonically between the zeros of classical Euler polynomials as the fractional part of the delay divided by the sampling period grows. Our results lead to sufficient and “almost necessary” conditions for the stable invertible of the discrete model for all sufficiently small values of the sampling period.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Åström, K.J, Hagander, P., and Sternby, J., Zeros of Sampled Systems, Proc. IEEE CDC’80, Albuquerque, 1980, pp. 1077–1081.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Åström, K.J., Hagander, P., and Sternby, J., Zeros of Sampled Systems, Automatica, 1984, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 21–38.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Bondarko, V.A., Discretization of Continuous Linear Dynamic Systems. Analysis of the Methods, Syst. Control Lett., 1984, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 97–101.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Weller, S.R., Moran, W., Ninness, S., et al., Sampling Zeros and the Euler–Frobenius Polynomials, IEEE Trans. Automat. Control, 2001, vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 340–343.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Bondarko, V.A., Suboptimal and Adaptive Control over Continuous Linear Objects with Delay, Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR, Tekh. Kibern., 1991, no. 1, pp. 62–68.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Hagiwara, T., Yuasa, T., and Araki, M., Stability of the Limiting Zeros of Sampled-Data Systems with Zero- and First-Order Holds, Int. J. Control, 1993, vol. 58, pp. 1325–1346.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Hagiwara, T., Analytic Study on the Intrinsic Zeros of Sampled Data Systems, IEEE Trans. Automat. Control, 1996, vol. 41, pp. 261–263.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Blachuta, M.J., On Zeros of Pulse Transfer Functions, IEEE Trans. Automat. Control, 1999, vol. 44, no. 6, pp. 1229–1234.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Hayakawa, Y., Hosoe, Sh., and Ito, M., On the Limiting Zeros of Sampled Multivariable Systems, Syst. Control Lett., 1983, vol. 2, no. 5, pp. 292–300.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Weller, S.R., Limiting Zeros of Decouplable MIMO Systems, IEEE Trans. Automat. Control, 1999, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 129–134.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Falb, P.L. and Wolovich, W.A., Decoupling in the Design and Synthesis of the Multivariable Control Systems, IEEE Trans. Automat. Control, 1967, vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 651–659.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Fomin, V.N., Fradkov, A.L., and Yakubovich, V.A., Adaptivnoe upravlenie dinamicheskimi ob”ektami (Adaptive Control over Dynamic Objects), Moscow: Nauka, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Bondarko, V.A. and Yakubovich, V.A., The Method of Recursive Aim Inequalities in Adaptive Control Theory, Int. J. Adaptive Control Signal Proc., 1992, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 141–160.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Fomichev, V.V., Il’in, A.V., and Korovin, S.K., Teoriya upravleniya. Metody robastnogo obrashcheniya dinamicheskikh sistem (Control Theory. Robust Inversion Methods for Dynamical Systems), Moscow: Fizmatlit, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Isidori, A., Nonlinear Control Systems, Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1995, 3rd ed.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Frobenius, G., On Bernoulli Numbers and Euler Polynomials, in Sitzungsberichte der Königlich Preu ischen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin, 1910, pp. 809–847.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Sobolev, S.L., On the Roots of Euler Polynomials, Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR, 1977, vol. 235, no. 2, pp. 277–280.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Sobolev, S.L., On the Boundary Roots of Euler Polynomials, Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR, 1978, vol. 242, no. 5, pp. 1016–1019.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Sobolev, S.L., More On the Roots of Euler Polynomials, Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR, 1979, vol. 245, no. 4, pp. 801–804.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. St. Petersburg State University, St. Petersburg, Russia

    V. A. Bondarko

Authors
  1. V. A. Bondarko
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to V. A. Bondarko.

Additional information

Original Russian Text © V.A. Bondarko, 2015, published in Avtomatika i Telemekhanika, 2015, No. 8, pp. 3–26.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bondarko, V.A. Limiting zeros of sampled systems with time delay. Autom Remote Control 76, 1327–1346 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0005117915080019

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0005117915080019

Keywords

Search

Navigation