Phonetica was published by Karger Publishers up to and including 2020. If you or your institution subscribed to Phonetica during that period, you might still have access to the full text of this article on the Karger platform if you cannot access it here.
Abstract
Some Khmu’ dialects have phonologically distinctive voice registers.Auditory observations have claimed a stable distinction between clear voice andhigh pitch for Register 1 and breathy voice and low pitch for Register 2 in theKhmu’ Rawk dialect of northern Thailand. Word pairs distinguished only by registerwere recorded by 25 native speakers. Acoustic analysis yielded F0 and overallamplitude contours, frequencies of F1 and F2 in quasi-steady states of the vowels,relative intensities of higher harmonics to that of the first harmonic, and voweldurations. When circumstances caused early attention to perception testing, thewords of only 8 speakers had been analyzed for properties other than amplitudeand F0. Since the only significant factor that had emerged by then was F0 contour,the synthetic stimuli were made with just a series of seven contours. The labelingby 32 native speakers yielded two categories, demonstrating the sufficiency of F0as an acoustic cue. The completed acoustic analysis showed a significant effect ofone of the harmonic ratios for the women only, suggesting a conservative bias.The language has been shifting toward tonality and may have reached it.
verified
© 2007 S. Karger AG, Basel