Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter Mouton May 28, 2015

The Phonetic Realization of Devoiced Vowels in the Southern Ute Language

  • Stacey Oberly ORCID logo and Viktor Kharlamov
From the journal Phonetica

Abstract

In this article, we analyze the phonetic realizations of devoiced vowels from 8 fluent speakers of Southern Ute, a severely endangered Southern Numic Uto-Aztecan language spoken in Southwestern Colorado. Devoiced vowels are considered to be an important aspect of the phonology of Southern Ute, yet very little is known about the pronunciation of such segments. Our findings indicate that devoiced vowels are realized phonetically in three ways: (i) fully voiceless, (ii) partially devoiced, and (iii) fully reduced with concurrent lengthening, lower intensity and greater voicelessness of the preceding consonant. Such variable and noncategorical devoicing is seen for both high and nonhigh vowels and all consonants regardless of their manner of articulation.


verified



*Stacey Oberly, PO Box 210025, Tucson, AZ 85721 (USA), E-Mail soberly@email.arizona.edu

References

1 Armagost J (1985): On predicting voiceless vowels in Comanche. Kansas Working Papers Linguist: Stud Native Am Lang IV:1-15.10.17161/KWPL.1808.499Search in Google Scholar

2 Armagost J, Miller W (2000): Are voiceless vowels phonemic in Comanche? In Casad E, Willet T (eds): Uto-Zatecan: Structural, Temporal, and Geographic Perspectives. Hermosillo, Universidad de Sonora, pp 57-82.Search in Google Scholar

3 Beckman ME (1996): When is a syllable not a syllable? In Otake T, Cutler A (eds): Phonological Structure and Language Processing: Cross-Linguistic Studies. Berlin, Mouton de Gruyter.Search in Google Scholar

4 Beckman ME, Shoji A (1994): Spectral and perceptual evidence for CV coarticulation in Japanese devoiced /si/ and /syu/. Phonetica 41:61-71.Search in Google Scholar

5 Blumstein SE, Steven KN (1980): Perceptual invariance and onset spectra for stop consonants in different vowel environments. J Acoust Soc Am 67:648-662.10.1121/1.383890Search in Google Scholar

6 Boersma P, Weenink D (2014): Praat: doing phonetics by computer (computer program); version 5.3.59. http://www.praat.org/ (accessed November 25, 2013).Search in Google Scholar

7 Browman CP, Goldstein L (1990): Gestural specification using dynamically defined articulatory structures. J Phon 18:299-320.10.1016/S0095-4470(19)30376-6Search in Google Scholar

8 Canonge E (1957): Voiceless vowels in Comanche. Int J Am Linguist 23:63-67.10.1086/464394Search in Google Scholar

9 Cedergren HJ, Simoneau L (1985): La chute des voyelles hautes en Francais de Montreal: as-tu entendu la belle syncope? In Lemieux M, Cedergren HJ (eds): Les tendences dynamiques de Français parlé à Montreal. Montreal, Office de la Langue Française, pp 57-144.Search in Google Scholar

10 Charney J (1993): A Grammar of Comanche. Lincoln, University of Nebraska Press.Search in Google Scholar

11 Charney J (1996): Ute Dictionary. Ignacio, Southern Ute Tribe.Search in Google Scholar

12 Davidson L (2006): Schwa elision in fast speech: segmental deletion or gestural overlap? Phonetica 63:79-112.10.1159/000095304Search in Google Scholar

13 Eftychiou E (2010): Routes to lenition: an acoustic study. PLoS One 5:1-13.10.1371/journal.pone.0009828Search in Google Scholar

14 Givon T (1979): Ute Dictionary. Ignacio, Southern Ute Tribe.Search in Google Scholar

15 Givon T (1980): Ute Reference Grammar. Ignacio, Southern Ute Tribe.Search in Google Scholar

16 Givon T (2013): Ute Reference Grammar. Philadelphia, Benjamins.Search in Google Scholar

17 Gordon M (1998): The phonetics and phonology of non-modal vowels: a cross-linguistic perspective. Berkeley Linguist Soc 24:93-105.10.3765/bls.v24i1.1246Search in Google Scholar

18 Goss J (1972): Ute Lexical and Phonological Patterns; PhD diss University of Chicago.Search in Google Scholar

19 Greenberg J (1969): Some methods of dynamic comparison in linguistics; in Puhvel J (ed): Substance and Structure of Languages. Los Angeles, Center for Research in Languages and Linguistics, pp 147-204.Search in Google Scholar

20 Harms R (1966): Stress, voice, and length in Southern Paiute. Int J Am Linguist 32:228-235.10.1086/464907Search in Google Scholar

21 Imai T (2004): Vowel Devoicing in Tokyo Japanese: A Variationist Approach; PhD diss Michigan State University.Search in Google Scholar

22 Jaeger A (1978): Speech aerodynamics and phonological universals; in Proc 4th Annu Meet Berkeley Linguist Soc, pp 311-329.10.3765/bls.v4i0.2221Search in Google Scholar

23 Jannedy S (1994): Rate effects on German unstressed syllables. Working Papers Linguist, Ohio State University 44:105-124.Search in Google Scholar

24 Jun S-A, Beckman ME (1993): A gestural-overlap analysis of vowel devoicing in Japanese and Korean. 1993 Annu Meet Linguist Soc Am, Los Angeles.Search in Google Scholar

25 Kröger B (1993): A gestural production model and its application to reduction in German. Phonetica 501:213-233.10.1159/000261943Search in Google Scholar

26 Ladefoged P, Maddieson I (1996): Sounds of the World's Languages. Malden, Wiley Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

27 Lehiste I, Peterson G (1959): Vowel amplitude and phonemic stress in American English. J Acoust Soc Am 31:428-435.10.1121/1.1907729Search in Google Scholar

28 Lewis PM (ed) (2009): Ethnologue: Languages of the World, ed 16. Dallas, SIL International.Search in Google Scholar

29 Manaster-Ramer A (1986): Genesis of Hopi tones. Int J Am Linguist 52:154-160.10.1086/466010Search in Google Scholar

30 Martin SE (1987): The Japanese Language through Time. New Haven, Yale University Press.Search in Google Scholar

31 Miyashita M (2000): Less stress, less pressure, less voice. Proc Southwest Workshop on Optimality Theory Conf 4, pp 43-55.Search in Google Scholar

32 Mo Y (2007): Temporal, spectral evidence of devoiced vowels in Korean. Proc 16th Int Congr Phon Sci, ID 1597, pp 445-448.Search in Google Scholar

33 Oberly S (2008): A Phonetic Analysis of Southern Ute with a Discussion of Southern Ute Language Policies and Revitalization; PhD diss University of Arizona.Search in Google Scholar

34 Ogasawara N (2007): Processing of Speech Variability: Vowel Reduction in Japanese; PhD diss University of Arizona.Search in Google Scholar

35 Ohala JJ (1975): A mathematical model of speech aerodynamics; in Fant G (ed): Speech Communication: Speech Production and Synthesis by Rule, 2. Stockholm, Almqvist & Wiksell, pp 65-72.Search in Google Scholar

36 Ostreicher HJ, Sharf DJ (1976): Effects of coarticulation of the identification of deleted consonant and vowels. J Phon 4:285-301.10.1016/S0095-4470(19)31256-2Search in Google Scholar

37 Press M (1979): Chemehuevi: A Grammar and Lexicon. Berkeley, University of California Press.Search in Google Scholar

38 Sapir E (1930): The Southern Paiute Language. Proc Am Acad Arts Sci 65:1-296.10.2307/20026309Search in Google Scholar

39 Tsuchida A (1997): Phonetics and Phonology of Japanese Vowel Devoicing; PhD diss Cornell University, Ithaca.Search in Google Scholar

40 Tsuchida A (2001): Japanese vowel devoicing: cases of consecutive devoicing environments. J East Asian Linguist 10:225-245.10.1023/A:1011221225072Search in Google Scholar

41 Whorf B (1934): Hopi Verb Classes. Ms No 1570. Philadelphia, Library of the American Philosophical Society.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2014-08-18
Accepted: 2015-02-12
Published Online: 2015-05-28
Published in Print: 2015-10-01

© 2015 S. Karger AG, Basel

Downloaded on 27.1.2025 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1159/000381551/html
Scroll to top button