Zusammenfassung
In diesem Beitrag wird die konzeptuelle Plattform Innovari präsentiert, mit deren Hilfe kollaborative, digitale Innovationsprozesse im Unternehmen unterstützt werden können. In einer sich schnell verändernden globalisierten Welt, die von technologischem Wandel geprägt ist, müssen Unternehmen die Fähigkeit zur Innovation ausbauen. Verteilte Arbeit und Spezialisierung von Wissen führen dazu, dass digitale Innovationslösungen in den Vordergrund rücken. Hindernisse hierbei sind jedoch verankert in ineffizienter Kollaboration, festgesetzten Hierarchien und psychologischen Bürden, die die gemeinsame Arbeit erschweren.
Das Tool Innovari unterstützt die Kollaboration mit einer moderierenden künstlichen Intelligenz in Form eines Chat Bots und einem durch Spielmechaniken motivierenden Prozess bei der Findung von Innovationen. Verschiedenste Mechanismen helfen dabei, die Vorzüge vielfältiger Gruppen zu nutzen, um unkonventionelle Denkweisen zu stimulieren und so bessere Ergebnisse kollaborativer Prozesse zu ermöglichen.
Abstract
This article presents the conceptual platform Innovari, which can be used to support collaborative, digital innovation processes in enterprises. The rapidly changing globalized world is characterized by technological change. Enterprises must expand their ability to innovate in order to stay relevant. Distributed work and specialization of knowledge lead to digital innovation solutions coming to the fore. Obstacles are anchored in inefficient collaboration, fixed hierarchies and psychological burdens that complicate collaborative work.
The Innovari platform supports collaboration with moderating artificial intelligence in the form of chatbots and gamification elements. Various mechanisms help to use the advantages of diverse groups to stimulate unconventional ways of thinking. Innovari enables better results in collaborative processes and thus finding innovations.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Literatur
Becker J, Bergener K, Voigt M (2010) Supporting creative group processes – design principles for appropriate groupware. Eur Conf Inf Syst (ECIS 2010). Bd. 34
Chen F, Zhang L, Latimer J (2014) How much has my co-worker contributed? the impact of anonymity and feedback on social loafing in asynchronous virtual collaboration. Int J Inf Manage 34:652–659. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2014.05.001
Clawson VK, Bostrom RP, Anson R (1993) The role of the facilitator in computer-supported meetings. Small Group Res 24:547–565. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496493244007
Connolly T, Jessup LM, Valacich JS (1990) Effects of anonymity and evaluative tone on idea generation in computer-mediated groups. Manage Sci 36:689–703. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.36.6.689
Dennis AR, Valacich JS (1993) Computer brainstorms: more heads are better than one. J Appl Psychol 78:531–537. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.78.4.531
Dickson GW, Lee-Partridge JE, Limayem M, Desanctis GL (1996) Facilitating computer-supported meetings: a cumulative analysis in a multiple-criteria task environment. Group Decis Negot 5:51–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02404176
Fischer G (2000) Symmetry of ignorance, social creativity, and meta-design. Knowl Based Syst 13:527–537. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0950-7051(00)00065-4
Hilliges O, Terrenghi L, Boring S et al (2007) Designing for collaborative creative problem solving. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Creativity & Cognition, S 137–146
van Knippenberg D, De Dreu CKW, Homan AC (2004) Work group diversity and group performance: an integrative model and research agenda. J Appl Psychol 89:1008–1022. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.89.6.1008
Koster R (2005) Theory of fun for game design. O’Reilly Media, Sebastopol, CA, USA
Kramer TJ, Fleming GP, Mannis SM (2001) Improving face-to-face brainstorming through modeling and facilitation. Small Group Res 32:533–557. https://doi.org/10.1177/104649640103200502
Lebeuf C, Storey M‑A, Zagalsky A (2017) How software developers mitigate collaboration friction with chatbots. In: 20th ACM conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (CSCW ’17)
Leimeister JM (2014) Collaboration engineering. Springer Gabler, Berlin Heidelberg
Paulus PB, Brown VR (2007) Toward more creative and innovative group idea generation: a cognitive-social-motivational perspective of brainstorming. Soc Pers Psychol Compass 1:248–265. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2007.00006.x
Paulus PB, Dzindolet MT (1993) Social influence processes in group brainstorming. J Pers Soc Psychol 64:575–586. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.64.4.575
Scheiner CW, Witt M, Voigt K‑I, Robra-Bissantz S (2012) Einsatz von Spielmechaniken in Ideenwettbewerben: Einsatzmotive, Wirkungen und Herausforderungen. In: Mattfeld DC (Hrsg) Multikonferenz Wirtschaftsinformatik. Institut für Wirtschaftsinformatik, Braunschweig, S 781–792
Siemon D, Lattemann C, Robra-Bissantz S (2017) Forming virtual teams – visualization with digital whiteboards to increase shared understanding, satisfaction and perceived effectiveness. In: International Conference on Information Systems, S 1–17
Starbuck WH, Webster J (1991) When is play productive? Account Manag Inf Technol 1:71–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/0959-8022(91)90013-5
Strohmann T, Fischer S, Siemon D et al (2018) Virtual moderation assistance: creating design guidelines for virtual assistants supporting creative workshops. In: Proceedings of the 22nd Pacific Asian Conference on Information Systems (PACIS)
Subramaniam M, Youndt MA (2005) The influence of intellectual capital on the types of innovative capabilities. Acad Manage J 48:450–463. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2005.17407911
Töpfer A, Maertins A, Duchmann C (2015) Risiko-Identifikation durch Elektronisches Brainstorming für Szenario-Analysen. Control Z Erfolgsorientier Unternehmenssteuer 27:587–592
Wang H‑C, Rosé CP, Chang C‑Y (2011) Agent-based dynamic support for learning from collaborative brainstorming in scientific inquiry. Int J Comput Collab Learn 6:371–395. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-011-9124-x
Zadrozny W, Budzikowska M, Chai J et al (2000) Natural language dialogue for personalized interaction. Commun ACM 43:116–120. https://doi.org/10.1145/345124.345164
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mirbabaie, M., Stieglitz, S., Priesmeyer, J. et al. Einsatz von Spielmechaniken und Bots zur Moderation von Kreativitätsprozessen in Unternehmen. HMD 56, 147–159 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1365/s40702-018-00475-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1365/s40702-018-00475-5