Skip to main content
Log in

Vom Customizing zurück zum SAP-Standard – Möglichkeiten und Grenzen bei der Migration auf SAP S/4HANA

From an individually configured information system back to the standard – possibilities and limitations of a migration to SAP S/4HANA

  • Schwerpunkt
  • Published:
HMD Praxis der Wirtschaftsinformatik Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

Dieser Beitrag zeigt auf, wie eine Migration von SAP R/3 zu SAP S/4HANA möglich ist. Der Fokus liegt hierbei auf der Rückführung von kundenindividuell angepassten SAP-ERP-Systemen zum SAP-Standard. Neben den Möglichkeiten der Migration werden auch die Grenzen selbiger aufgezeigt. Zunächst wird das ASAP-8-Vorgehensmodell, der SAP SE, vorgestellt.

Als Möglichkeiten werden ein Prozessmodell sowie eine geordnete Toolunterstützung präsentiert, die in ein angepasstes ASAP-8-Vorgehensmodell eingehen. Dieses enthält Anpassungen für die Migration von kundenindividuell angepassten SAP-ERP-Systemen. Die wichtigste identifizierte Grenze ohne Lösungsansatz stellt das Vorhandensein komplexer Klassen im Programmcode dar. Dies kann zu Einschränkungen bei einer Migration zu SAP S/4HANA führen.

Abschließend folgen Resümee und Ausblick zu weiteren Optimierungen beim Vorgehen in einem Migrationsprojekt.

Abstract

This article shows the possibilities to migrate from SAP R/3 to SAP S/4HANA. The focus lies on moving individually configured SAP ERP-systems back to the SAP-standard. Beside the possibilities, this article will also present the limitations of a migration. At first, a presentation of the ASAP 8 procedure model of the SAP SE will take place.

Following this, the possibilities of a process model as well as a controlled support of tools will be described. Both will be included in a changed ASAP 8 procedure model, which contains amendments with respect to a migration of customized SAP ERP-systems. The most important identified limitation without a solution approach is the availability of complex classes in the program code. This can lead to restrictions during a migration to SAP S/4HANA.

Finally, a conclusion gets drawn and an outlook is given regarding further optimization in the process of such a migration project.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Abb. 1

Literatur

  • Becker M, Klingner S (2012) Towards customer-individual configurations of business process models, enterprise, business-process and information systems modeling. 13th International Conference, BPMDS 2012, 17th International Conference, EMMSAD 2012, and 5th EuroSymposium, held at CAiSE 2012, Danzig, S 121–135

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bisbal J, Lawless D, Wu B, Grimson J, Wade V, Richardson R, O’Sullivan D (1997) A survey of research into legacy system migration (techn. Bericht). Broadcom Éireann Research, Dublin, S 1–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Boehm BW (1979) Software engineering – as it is. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Software Engineering, Munich, S 11–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Ducasse S, Lanza M (2005) The class blueprint: visually supporting the understanding of classes. IEEE Trans Softw Eng 31(1):75–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Färber F, Cha SK, Primsch J, Bornhövd C, Sigg S, Lehner W (2011) SAP HANA database: data management for modern business applications. ACM Sigmod Rec 40(4):45–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fayyad U, Piatetsky-Shapiro G, Smyth P (1996) From data mining to knowledge discovery in databases. Ai Mag 17(3):37–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghattamneni MR (2016a) Integrating ERP Business Components into SAP S/4 HANA Cloud Edition – A Functional and Technical. Am J Comput Archit 3(1):1–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghattamneni MR (2016b) Migration Strategies while Working with ERP (Enterprise Resource Planning) Packages Like SAP Suite, HANA and S/4 HANA. Am J Comput Archit 3(1):8–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalaimani J (2016) SAP project management pitfalls: how to avoid the most common pitfalls of an SAP solution. Apress, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lanza M (2001) The evolution matrix: recovering software evolution using software visualization techniques. Proceedings of the 4th international Workshop on Principles of Software Evolution, Wien, S 37–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Missbach M, Staerk T, Gardiner C, McCloud J, Madl R, Tempes M, Anderson G (2016) SAP on the cloud. Springer, Heidelberg

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • SAP AG (2013) Considerations for custom ABAP code when migrating to SAP HANA (white paper). https://www.sap.com/documents/2013/09/702792e8-527c-0010-82c7-eda71af511fa.html. Zugegriffen: 28. Mai 2017

    Google Scholar 

  • SAP AG (2017) SAP activate methodology. https://support.sap.com/en/offerings-programs/methodologies/implement.html. Zugegriffen: 28. Mai 2017

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner F, Mathäß K (2016) The Road to SAP S/4HANA – transition and deployment options for SAP S/4HANA (White Paper). https://websmp204.sap-ag.de/~sapidp/012002523100011787552015E.pdf. Zugegriffen: 28. Mai 2017

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Benjamin Warnecke.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Warnecke, B. Vom Customizing zurück zum SAP-Standard – Möglichkeiten und Grenzen bei der Migration auf SAP S/4HANA. HMD 55, 151–162 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1365/s40702-017-0358-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1365/s40702-017-0358-6

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Navigation