Summary
In the late 19th century, the early investigations of brain function were dominated by the concept of functional segregation. This focus was driven largely by the data available to scientists of that era. Patients with circumscribed lesions were found who were impaired in one particular ability while other abilities remained largely intact. In the first part of the 20th century, the idea of functional segregation fell into disrepute and the doctrine of “mass action” held sway, proposing that higher abilities depended on the function of the brain “as a whole.” Although seen as opposing concepts, functional integration and functional segregation are not mutually exclusive, but exist only in relation to each other. For the last decade, functional neuroimaging techniques have been used to infer functional and effective connectivity in the human brain. However, the advent of event-related fMRI experiments have apparently complicated analyses of effective connectivity because variance components induced by different events cannot be easily separated at the hemodynamic level. Only recently, a new technique, dynamic causal modeling (DCM) was introduced, which provides a general framework for the analysis of effective connectivity and also allows the estimation of effective connectivity analyses in rapid event-related designs.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aertsen, A. and Preissl, H. Dynamics of activity and connectivity in physiological neuronal Networks. VCH Publishers Inc, New York, 1991.
Büchel, C. and Friston, K. J. (1997) Modulation of connectivity in visual pathways by attention: Cortical interactions evaluated with structural equation modelling and fMRI. Cerebral Cortex 7, 768–778.
Friston, K. J. (2002) Bayesian estimation of dynamical systems: an application to fMRI. Neuroimage 16, 513–530.
Friston, K. J., Büchel, C., Fink, G. R., Morris, J., Rolls, E., and Dolan, R. J. (1997) Psychophysiological and modulatory interactions in neuroimaging. Neuroimage 6, 218–229.
Friston, K. J., Frith, C. D., and Frackowiak, R. S. J. (1993a) Time-dependent changes in effective connectivity measured with PET. Human Brain Mapping 1, 69–80.
Friston, K. J., Frith, C. D., Liddle, P. F., and Frackowiak, R. S. J. (1993b) Functional connectivity: The principal component analysis of large (PET) data sets. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab 13, 5–14.
Friston, K. J., Harrison, L., and Penny, W. (2003) Dynamic causal modelling. Neuroimage 19, 1273–1302.
Gerstein, G. L., Bedenbaugh, P., and Aertsen, A. (1989) Neuronal assemblies. IEEE Trans. on Biomed. Engineering 36, 4–14.
Gerstein, G. L. and Perkel, D. H. (1969) Simultaneously recorded trains of action potentials: Analysis and functional interpretation. Science 164, 828–830.
Gitelman, D. R., Penny, W. D., Ashburner, J., and Friston, K. J. (2003) Modeling regional and psychophysiologic interactions in fMRI: the importance of hemodynamic deconvolution. Neuroimage 19, 200–207.
Hebb, D. O. (1949) The Organization of Behavior. Wiley, New York.
Lashley, K. S. (1929) Brain Mechanisms and Intelligence. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Büchel, C. Perspectives on the estimation of effective connectivity from neuroimaging data. Neuroinform 2, 169–173 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1385/NI:2:2:169
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1385/NI:2:2:169