Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter August 13, 2015

From Hippocrates to statistics. A historical perspective

  • Ryszard Witold Gryglewski EMAIL logo

Abstract

Hippocrates introduced some level of philosophical reflection to the art of medical practice and made it a science for the very first time. This is how medicine was born. Introducing his theory of life, which was based on the principle of balance of four liquids (sc. humoral theory), Hippocrates created the first model of living organism in its proper physiological condition as well as in its pathological symptoms. The influence of Hippocratic thought on the development of European medicine was significant and became an inspiration for many generations of physicians seeking a final definition of health and disease. This, in consequence, resulted in the development of methodical tools that could be helpful in the description and interpretation of the phenomenon of life. The introduction of “numerical” methods followed by statistical methods to 19th-century medicine opened new ways for scientific investigation. One of most important pioneers in that field was French physician Pierre-Charles-Alexandre Louis. Statistics played an important role in the formation of new pathological and epidemiological models by Carl Rokitansky, Ignaz Semmelweis, and John Snow, became a standard procedure in clinical research of Carl Wunderlich, and finally found its full development in present-day evidence-based-medicine.


Corresponding author: Ryszard Witold Gryglewski, History of Medicine, Jagiellonian University, Kopernika 7, Kraków 31-034, Poland, E-mail:

  1. Author contributions: The author has accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.

  2. Research funding: None declared.

  3. Employment or leadership: None declared.

  4. Honorarium: None declared.

  5. Competing interests: The funding organization(s) played no role in the study design; in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; or in the decision to submit the report for publication.

References

1. Smith WD. The Hippocratic tradition. Electronic edition. Revised 2002.Search in Google Scholar

2. Bujalkova M, Straka S, Jureckova A. Hippocrates’ humoral pathology in nowaday’s reflections. Bratisl Lek Listy 2001;102:489–92. Available at: http://www.bmj.sk/2001/10210-11.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

3. Magner LN. A history of medicine. New York: Marcel Dekker, 1992.Search in Google Scholar

4. Maquet P. Iatrophysics to biomechanics. From Borelli (1608–1679) to Pauwels (1885–1980). J Bone Joint Surg Br 1992;74:335–9.10.1302/0301-620X.74B3.1587872Search in Google Scholar

5. Low G. Thomas Sydenham: the English Hippocrates. Aust NZ J Surg 1999;69:258–62.10.1046/j.1440-1622.1999.01557.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

6. Dewhurst K. Thomas Sydenham. Reformer of clinical medicine. Med Hist 1962;6:101–18.10.1017/S0025727300027083Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

7. Debus AG. The chemical philosophy. Paracelsian science and medicine in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries. Courier Corporation, 2nd ed. New York: Science History Publications, 2002:447–50. Available at: https://books.google.pl/books?id=y8YaZeiHQnEC&printsec=frontcover&hl=pl&source=gbs_ge_summary_r&cad=0#v=onepage&q&f=false.Search in Google Scholar

8. Partington JR. Joan Baptista Van Helmont. Ann Sci 1939;1:359–84.10.1080/00033793600200291Search in Google Scholar

9. Major RH. A history of medicine. Vol. 2. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific, 1954.Search in Google Scholar

10. Knoeff R. Herman Boerhaave (1668–1783): Calvinist chemist and physician; history of science and scholarship in the Netherlands. Vol. 3. Amsterdam: Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences, 2002. Available at: http://www.dwc.knaw.nl/wp-content/HSSN/2002-3-Knoef-Herman%20Boerhaave.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

11. Porter R. Medical science. In: Porter R, editor. The Cambridge illustrated history of medicine, 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006:162–3.Search in Google Scholar

12. Buess H. Albrecht von Haller and his ‘Elementa Physiologiae’ as the beginning of pathological physiology. Med Hist 1959;3:123–31.10.1017/S0025727300024406Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

13. Rosen G. Percussion and nostalgia. J Hist Med Allied Sci 1972;27:448–50.10.1093/jhmas/XXVII.4.448Search in Google Scholar

14. Ventura HO. Giovanni Battista Morgagni and the foundation of modern medicine. Clin Cardiol 2000;23:792–4.10.1002/clc.4960231021Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

15. Roguin A. Rene Theophile Hyacinthe Laënnec (1781–1826): the man behind the stethoscope. Clin Med Res 2006;4: 230–5.10.3121/cmr.4.3.230Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

16. Shoja MM, Tubbs RS, Loukas M, Shokouhi G, Ardalan MR. Marie-François Xavier Bichat (1771–1802) and his contributions to the foundations of pathological anatomy and modern medicine. Ann Anat 2008;190:413–20.10.1016/j.aanat.2008.07.004Search in Google Scholar PubMed

17. Best M, Neuhauser D. Pierre Charles Alexandre Louis: master of the spirit of mathematical clinical science. Qual Saf Health Care 2005;14:462–4.10.1136/qshc.2005.016816Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

18. Morabia A. Pierre-Charles-Alexandre Louis and the evaluation of bloodletting. J R Soc Med 2006;99:158–60.10.1177/014107680609900322Search in Google Scholar

19. Mackowiak PH, Worden G. Carl Reinhold August Wunderlich and the evolution of clinical thermometry. Clin Infect Dis 1994;18:458–67.10.1093/clinids/18.3.458Search in Google Scholar PubMed

20. Vinten-Johansen P, Brody H, Paneth N, Rachman S, Rip M. Cholera, chloroform, and the science of medicine: a life of John Snow. Oxford University Press, 2003. Electronic version. Available at: https://books.google.pl/books?id=_93j18W7cvwC&printsec=frontcover&dq=cholera+chloroform+and+the+science+of+medicine+a+life+of+john+snow&hl=pl&sa=X&ved=0CCAQ6AEwAGoVChMI2IPjpo-ZxwIVydwsCh1DQwNj#v=onepage&q=cholera%20chloroform%20and%20the%20science%20of%20medicine%20a%20life%20of%20john%20snow&f=false.Search in Google Scholar

21. Simmons JG. Doctors and discoveries: lives that created today’s medicine. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 2002. Electronic version. Available at: https://books.google.pl/books/about/Doctors_and_Discoveries.html?id=PD2-gpsoh8kC&redir_esc=y.Search in Google Scholar

22. Gryglewski RW. Historia i filozofia medycyny Władysława Szumowskiego na tle rozwoju historii i filozofii medycyny w Europie i Polsce (Władysław Szumowski’s history and philosophy of medicine on the background of the development of the history and philosophy of medicine in Europe and Poland). Kraków: Gryglewski RW, 2012.Search in Google Scholar

23. Szumowski W. Filozofia medycyny [Philosophy of medicine]. Kęty: Wydawnictwo Marek Derewiecki, 2007.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2015-6-15
Accepted: 2015-7-20
Published Online: 2015-8-13
Published in Print: 2015-9-1

©2015 by De Gruyter

Downloaded on 20.5.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/bams-2015-0020/html
Scroll to top button