Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter December 2, 2015

Modeling of lumbar spine equipped with fixator

  • Justyna Gerke , Anna M. Ryniewicz and Tomasz Madej EMAIL logo

Abstract

Anatomical model of fragment of lumbar spine and rod fixator with screw attachment were made. Numerical analyses (use of finite element method) were executed. Results show that stresses in the analyzed structure depend on the size of the fixator used. Authors suggest further research.


Corresponding author: Tomasz Madej, Department of Machine Design and Technology, AGH University of Science and Technology, Kraków, Małopolskie, Poland, E-mail:

  1. Author contributions: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.

  2. Financial support: None declared.

  3. Employment or leadership: None declared.

  4. Honorarium: None declared.

  5. Competing interests: The funding organization(s) played no role in the study design; in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; or in the decision to submit the report for publication.

References

1. Gzik MK. Human spine biomechanics. Gliwice: Silesian University of Technology press, 2007.Search in Google Scholar

2. Zhou SH, McCarthy ID, McGregor AH, Coombs RR, Hughes SP. Geometrical dimensions of the lower lumbar vertebrae – analysis of data from digitized CT images. Eur Spine J 2000;9:242–8.10.1007/s005860000140Search in Google Scholar

3. Jalalian A, Gibson I, Tay EH. Computational biomechanical modeling of scoliotic spine: challenges and opportunities. Spine Deform 2013;1:401–11.10.1016/j.jspd.2013.07.009Search in Google Scholar

4. Tadeusiewicz R. Biocybernetics – methodological fundamentals for biomedical engineering. Warszawa: PWN, 2013.Search in Google Scholar

5. Mouraa DC, Barbosab JG. Real-scale 3D models of the scoliotic spine from biplanar radiography without calibration objects. Comput Med Imag Grap 2014;38:580–85.10.1016/j.compmedimag.2014.05.007Search in Google Scholar

6. Nabhani F, Wake M. Computer modelling and stress analysis of the lumbar spine. J Mater Process Tech 2002; 127:40–47.10.1016/S0924-0136(02)00195-4Search in Google Scholar

7. Awłasiewicz T, Kędzior K, Krzesiński G. Finite element method in the study a set of stabilizing segment of the spine. In: Zarzycki D, Ciupik LF, editors. DERO System: development of techniques for the surgical treatment of spine. Zielona Góra, 1997:115–22.Search in Google Scholar

8. Ryniewicz AM. Identification, modeling and biotribology of human joints. Kraków: AGH University of Science and Technology press, 2011.Search in Google Scholar

9. Ryniewicz AM, Skrzat J, Ryniewicz A, Ryniewicz W, Walocha J. Geometry of the articular facets of the lateral atlanto-axial joints in the case of occipitalization. Folia Morphol 2010;69:147–53.Search in Google Scholar

10. Pitzen T, Geisler F, Matthis D, Müller-Storz H, Barbier D, Steudel W-I, et al. A finite element model for predicting the biomechanical behavior of the human lumbar spine. Control Eng Pract 2002;10:83–90.10.1016/S0967-0661(01)00129-0Search in Google Scholar

11. Jaramillo H, Gómez L, Garcia J. A finite element model of the L4-L5-S1 human spine segment including the heterogeneity and anisotropy of the discs. Acta Bioeng Biomech 2015;17:15–24.Search in Google Scholar

12. Cronin D. Finite element modeling of potential cervical spine pain sources in neutral position low speed rear impact. J Mech Behav Biomed 2014;33:55–66.10.1016/j.jmbbm.2013.01.006Search in Google Scholar

13. Lavillea A, Laportea S, Skallia W. Parametric and subject-specific finite element modelling of the lower cervical spine. Influence of geometrical parameters on the motion patterns. J Biomech 2009;42:1409–15.Search in Google Scholar

14. Ezquerro F, Simón A, Prado M, Pérez A. Combination of finite element modeling and optimization for the study of lumbar spine biomechanics considering the 3D thorax-pelvis orientation. Med Eng Phys 2004;26:11–22.10.1016/S1350-4533(03)00128-0Search in Google Scholar

15. Wanga W, Zhangb H, Sadeghipoura K, Barana G. Effect of posterolateral disc replacement on kinematics and stress distribution in the lumbar spine: a finite element study. Med Eng Phys 2013;35:357–64.10.1016/j.medengphy.2012.05.013Search in Google Scholar PubMed

16. Ha SK. Finite element modeling of multi-level cervical spinal segments (C3–C6) and biomechanical analysis of an elastomer-type prosthetic disc. Med Eng Phys 2006;28:534–41.10.1016/j.medengphy.2005.09.006Search in Google Scholar PubMed

17. Shahmohammadia M, Shirazia HA, Karimia A, Navidbakhsha M. Finite element simulation of an artificial intervertebral disk using fiber reinforced laminated composite model. Tissue Cell 2014;46:299–303.10.1016/j.tice.2014.05.008Search in Google Scholar PubMed

18. Kurutza M, Oroszváryb L. Finite element analysis of weightbath hydrotraction treatment of degenerated lumbar spine segments in elastic phase. J Biomech 2010;43:433–41.10.1016/j.jbiomech.2009.10.004Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Received: 2015-9-24
Accepted: 2015-10-19
Published Online: 2015-12-2
Published in Print: 2015-12-1

©2015 by De Gruyter

Downloaded on 5.5.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/bams-2015-0032/html
Scroll to top button