Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter May 19, 2017

In silico study of the structure and function of Streptococcus mutans plasmidic proteins

  • Silvia Caprari , Giovanni Minervini , Valentina Brandi and Fabio Polticelli ORCID logo EMAIL logo

Abstract

The Gram-positive bacterium Streptococcus mutans is the principal causative agent of human tooth decay, an oral disease that affects the majority of the world’s population. Although the complete S. mutans genome is known, approximately 700 proteins are still annotated as hypothetical proteins, as no three-dimensional structure or homology with known proteins exists for them. Thus, the significant portion of genomic sequences coding for unknown-function proteins makes the knowledge of pathogenicity and survival mechanisms of S. mutans still incomplete. Plasmids are found in virtually every species of Streptococcus, and some of these mediate resistance to antibiotics and pathogenesis. However, there are strains of S. mutans that contain plasmids, such as LM7 and UA140, to which no function has been assigned yet. In this work, we describe an in silico study of the structure and function of all the S. mutans proteins encoded by pLM7 and pUA140 plasmids to gain insight into their biological function. A combination of different structural bioinformatics methodologies led to the identification of plasmidic proteins potentially required for the bacterial survival and pathogenicity. The structural information obtained on these proteins can be used to select novel targets for the design of innovative therapeutic agents towards S. mutans.

  1. Author contributions: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.

  2. Research funding: Authors wish to thank the University of Roma Tre for financial support. Silvia Caprari was supported by a CASPUR (http://www.caspur.it) PhD fellowship.

  3. Employment or leadership: None declared.

  4. Honorarium: None declared.

  5. Competing interests: The funding organization(s) played no role in the study design; in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; or in the decision to submit the report for publication.

References

1. Bowen WH. Dental caries – not just holes in teeth! A perspective. Mol Oral Microbiol 2016;31:228–33.10.1111/omi.12132Search in Google Scholar

2. Petersen PE. World Health Organization global policy for improvement of oral health-World Health Assembly. Int Dent J 2008;58:115–21.10.1111/j.1875-595X.2008.tb00185.xSearch in Google Scholar

3. Jin LJ, Lamster IB, Greenspan JS, Pitts NB, Scully C, Warnakulasuriya S. Global burden of oral diseases: emerging concepts, management and interplay with systemic health. Oral Dis 2016;22:609–19.10.1111/odi.12428Search in Google Scholar

4. Koo H, Jeon JG. Naturally occurring molecules as alternative therapeutic agents against cariogenic biofilms. Adv Dent Res 2009;21:63–8.10.1177/0895937409335629Search in Google Scholar

5. Jeon JG, Klein MI, Xiao J, Gregoire S, Rosalen PL, Koo H. Influences of naturally occurring agents in combination with fluoride on gene expression and structural organization of Streptococcus mutansin biofilms. BMC Microbiol 2009;9:228.10.1186/1471-2180-9-228Search in Google Scholar

6. Moreillon P, Que YA. Infective endocarditis. Lancet 2004;363:139–49.10.1016/S0140-6736(03)15266-XSearch in Google Scholar

7. Reference genome: Streptococcus mutans UA159 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genome/856).Search in Google Scholar

8. Caufield PW, Childers NK, Allen DN, Hansen JB. Distinct bacteriocin groups correlate with different groups of Streptococcus mutans plasmids. Infect Immun 1984;48:51–6.10.1128/iai.48.1.51-56.1985Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

9. Abranches J, Miller JH, Martinez AR, Simpson-Haidaris PJ, Burne RA, Lemos JA. The collagen-binding protein Cnm is required for Streptococcus mutans adherence to and intracellular invasion of human coronary artery endothelial cells. Infect Immun 2011;9:2277–84.10.1128/IAI.00767-10Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

10. Zhou X, Caufield PW, Li Y, Qi F. Complete nucleotide sequence and characterization of pUA140, a cryptic plasmid from Streptococcus mutans. Plasmid 2001;46:77–85.10.1006/plas.2001.1539Search in Google Scholar PubMed

11. Altschul SF, Madden TL, Schäffer AA, Zhang J, Zhang Z, Miller W, et al. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res 1997;25:3389–402.10.1093/nar/25.17.3389Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

12. Rohl CA, Strauss CE, Misura KM, Baker D. Protein structure prediction using Rosetta. Method Enzymol 2004;383:66–93.10.1016/S0076-6879(04)83004-0Search in Google Scholar

13. Yang Z. I-TASSER server for protein 3D structure prediction. BMC Bioinformatics 2008;9:40.10.1186/1471-2105-9-40Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

14. Petrey D, Xiang Z, Tang CL, Xie L, Gimpelev M, Mitros T, et al. Using multiple structure alignments, fast model building, and energetic analysis in fold recognition and homology modelling. Proteins 2003;53:430–5.10.1002/prot.10550Search in Google Scholar PubMed

15. Laskowski RA, MacArthur MW, Moss DS, Thornton JM. PROCHECK: a program to check the stereochemical quality of protein structures. J Appl Cryst 1993;26:283–91.10.1107/S0021889892009944Search in Google Scholar

16. Holm L, Kääriäninen S, Rosenström P, Schenkel A. Searching protein structure databases with DaliLite v.3. Bioinformatics 2008;24:2780–1.10.1093/bioinformatics/btn507Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

17. Ilyina TV, Koonin EV. Conserved sequence motifs in the initiator proteins for rolling circle DNA replication encoded by diverse replicons from eubacteria, eucaryotes and archeobacteria. Nucleic Acids Res 1992;20:3279–85.10.1093/nar/20.13.3279Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

18. Gomith-Rüth FX, Moncalián G, Luque-Pérez R, Gonzáles A, Cabezón E, de La Cruz F, et al. The bacterial conjugation protein TrwB resembles ring helicases and F1-ATPase. Nature 2001;409:637–41.10.1038/35054586Search in Google Scholar PubMed

19. Hirokawa T, Boon-Chieng S, Mitaku S. SOSUI: classification and secondary structure prediction system for membrane proteins. Bioinformatics 1998;14:378–9.10.1093/bioinformatics/14.4.378Search in Google Scholar PubMed

20. Dhaliwal S, Hoffman DW. The crystal structure of the N-terminal region of the alpha subunit of translation initiation factor 2 (eIF2alpha) from Saccharomyces cerevisiae provides a view of the loop containing serine 51, the target of the eIF2alpha-specific kinases. J Mol Biol 2003;334:187–95.10.1016/j.jmb.2003.09.045Search in Google Scholar PubMed

21. Hulo N, Bairoch A, Bulliard V, Cerutti L, Cuche BA, de Castro E, et al. The 20 years of PROSITE. Nucleic Acids Res 2008;36:D245–9.10.1093/nar/gkm977Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

22. Raumann BE, Rould MA, Pabo CO, Sauer RT. DNA recognition by β-sheets in the Arc repressor-operator crystal structure. Nature 1994;367:754–7.10.1038/367754a0Search in Google Scholar PubMed

23. Li G, Zhang Y, Inouye M, Ikura M. Structural mechanism of transcriptional autorepression of the Escherichia coli RelB/RelE antitoxin/toxin module. J Mol Biol 2008;380:107–19.10.1016/j.jmb.2008.04.039Search in Google Scholar PubMed

24. Kamada K, Hanaoka F. Conformational change in the catalytic site of the ribonucleaseYoeB toxin by YefM antitoxin. Mol Cell 2005;19:497–509.10.1016/j.molcel.2005.07.004Search in Google Scholar PubMed

25. Le Blanc DJ, Hawley RJ, Lee LN, St Martin EJ. “Conjugal” transfer of plasmid DNA among oral streptococci. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1978;75:3484–7.10.1073/pnas.75.7.3484Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

26. Leonard CJ, Aravind L, Koonin EV. Novel families of putative protein kinases in bacteria and Archaea: evolution of the “eukaryotic” protein kinase superfamily. Genome Res 1998;8:1038–47.10.1101/gr.8.10.1038Search in Google Scholar PubMed


Supplemental Material:

The online version of this article (DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/bams-2017-0012) offers supplementary material, available to authorized users.


Received: 2017-4-13
Accepted: 2017-4-26
Published Online: 2017-5-19
Published in Print: 2017-6-27

©2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 2.5.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/bams-2017-0012/html
Scroll to top button