Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter September 1, 2017

Role of the hydrophobic core in cytoskeleton protein: cardiac myosin binding protein C

  • Maria Gołda EMAIL logo , Mateusz Banach , Zdzisław Wiśniowski , Wojciech Ziajka , Leszek Konieczny and Irena Roterman

Abstract

Cardiac myosin binding protein C is the object of analysis presented in this paper. The fuzzy oil drop model was applied to analyze the status of the hydrophobic core in two forms of this protein: WT and R502W mutant. The status of the mutant is revealed to be of lower stability than the WT form. The high order of the hydrophobic core is interpreted as the factor of stability of the tertiary structure. The muscle proteins, which undergo significant structural changes as the consequence of external stretching forces, are expected to return to initial structures after the release of an external force. The mutant R502W appears to represent lower stability; thus, the return to the initial structure may be of lower probability. The comparable analysis to other muscle domains (titin) and immunoglobulin domains suggests the very subtle relation to the biological activity of these proteins.

  1. Author contributions: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.

  2. Research funding: This work was financially supported by Jagiellonian University Medical College grant system K/ZDS/006363.

  3. Employment or leadership: None declared.

  4. Honorarium: None declared.

  5. Competing interests: The funding organization(s) played no role in the study design; in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; or in the decision to submit the report for publication.

References

1. Morita H, Rehm HL, Menesses A, McDonough B, Roberts AE, Kucherlapati R, et al. Shared genetic causes of cardiac hypertrophy in children and adults. N Engl J Med 2008; 358:1899–908.10.1056/NEJMoa075463Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

2. Watkins H, Ashrafian H, Redwood C. Inherited cardiomyopathies. N Engl J Med 2011;364:1643–56.10.1056/NEJMra0902923Search in Google Scholar PubMed

3. Coats CJ, Elliott PM. Genetic biomarkers in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Biomarkers Med 2013;7:505–16.10.2217/bmm.13.79Search in Google Scholar PubMed

4. Marian AJ, Roberts R. The molecular basis of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy J Mol Cell Cardiol 2000;33:655–70.10.1006/jmcc.2001.1340Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

5. Gautel M, Zuffardi O, Freiburg A, Labeit S. Phosphorylation switches specific for the cardiac isoform of myosin binding protein-C: a modulator of cardiac contraction? EMBO J 1995;14:1952–95.10.1002/j.1460-2075.1995.tb07187.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

6. Carrier L. Cardiac myosin-binding protein C in the heart. Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss 2007;100:238–43.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

7. Camm AJ, Lüscher TF, Serruys PW. The ESC textbook of cardiovascular medicine. Hoboken, NJ: Blackwell Publishing Ltd., 2006.Search in Google Scholar

8. Banach M, Konieczny L, Roterman I. The fuzzy oil drop model, based on hydrophobicity density distribution, generalizes the influence of water environment on protein structure and function. J Theor Biol 2014;359:6–17.10.1016/j.jtbi.2014.05.007Search in Google Scholar PubMed

9. Dygut J, Kalinowska B, Banach M, Piwowar M, Konieczny L, Roterman I. Structural interface forms and their involvement in stabilization of multidomain proteins or protein complexes. Int J Mol Sci 2016;17:1741.10.3390/ijms17101741Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

10. Zhang XL, De S, McIntosh LP, Paetzel M. Structural characterization of the C3 domain of cardiac myosin binding protein C and its hypertrophic cardiomyopathy-related R502W mutant. Biochemistry 2014;53:5332–42.10.1021/bi500784gSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

11. Banach M, Konieczny L, Roterman I. Ligand-binding-site recognition. In: Roterman-Konieczna I, editor. Protein folding in silico. Oxford/Cambridge/Philadelphia/New Delhi: Woodhead Publishing (currently Elsevier), 2012:78–94.Search in Google Scholar

12. Banach M, Konieczny L, Roterman I. Use of the “fuzzy oil drop” model to identify the complexation area in protein homodimers. In: Roterman-Konieczna I, editor. Protein folding in silico. Oxford/Cambridge/Philadelphia/New Delhi: Woodhead Publishing (currently Elsevier), 2012:95–122.10.1533/9781908818256.95Search in Google Scholar

13. Kullback S, Leibler RA. On information and sufficiency. Ann Math Stat 1951;22:79–86.10.1214/aoms/1177729694Search in Google Scholar

14. Konieczny L, Brylinski M, Roterman I. Gauss-function-based model of hydrophobicity density in proteins. In Silico Biol 2006;6:15–22.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

15. Humphrey W, Dalke A, Schulten K. VMD – visual molecular dynamics. J Mol Graph 1996;14:33–8.10.1016/0263-7855(96)00018-5Search in Google Scholar PubMed

16. Kalinowska B, Banach M, Konieczny L, Roterman I. Application of divergence entropy to characterize the structure of the hydrophobic core in DNA interacting proteins. Entropy 2015;17:1477–507.10.3390/e17031477Search in Google Scholar

17. Schönfelder J, Perez-Jimenez R, Muñoz V. A simple two-state protein unfolds mechanically via multiple heterogeneous pathways at single-molecule resolution. Nat Commun 2016;7:11777.10.1038/ncomms11777Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Received: 2017-8-2
Accepted: 2017-8-10
Published Online: 2017-9-1
Published in Print: 2017-9-26

©2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 2.5.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/bams-2017-0018/html
Scroll to top button