Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter May 24, 2021

Image retrieval of MRI brain tumour images based on SVM and FCM approaches

  • Sonia Bansal EMAIL logo and Vineet Mehan

Abstract

Objectives

The key test in Content-Based Medical Image Retrieval (CBMIR) frameworks for MRI (Magnetic Resonance Imaging) pictures is the semantic hole between the low-level visual data caught by the MRI machine and the elevated level data seen by the human evaluator.

Methods

The conventional component extraction strategies centre just on low-level or significant level highlights and utilize some handmade highlights to diminish this hole. It is important to plan an element extraction structure to diminish this hole without utilizing handmade highlights by encoding/consolidating low-level and elevated level highlights. The Fleecy gathering is another packing technique, which is applied in plan depiction here and SVM (Support Vector Machine) is applied. Remembering the predefinition of bunching amount and enlistment cross-section is until now a significant theme, a new predefinition advance is extended in this paper, in like manner, and another CBMIR procedure is suggested and endorsed. It is essential to design a part extraction framework to diminish this opening without using painstakingly gathered features by encoding/joining low-level and critical level features.

Results

SVM and FCM (Fuzzy C Means) are applied to the power structures. Consequently, the incorporate vector contains all the objectives of the image. Recuperation of the image relies upon the detachment among request and database pictures called closeness measure.

Conclusions

Tests are performed on the 200 Image Database. Finally, exploratory results are evaluated by the audit and precision.


Corresponding author: Sonia Bansal, Research Scholar, ECE Department, Maharaja Agrasen University, Solan, Himachal Pradesh, India, E-mail:

  1. Research funding: No funding has been involved.

  2. Author contribution: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.

  3. Competing interests: No competing interest exists.

  4. Informed consent: Not applicable.

  5. Ethical approval: Not applicable.

  6. Availability of data and material: MRI Brain Tumour images are taken from UCI Machine Learning Repository where collection of databases, domain theories, and data generators are kept to be used by the machine learning community for the empirical analysis of machine learning algorithms.

References

1. Smith, JR, Chang, SF. Visual SEEK: a fully automated content-based image query system. In Proceedings of the 4th Int. Conf. on multimedia, 1996; 87–98.10.1145/244130.244151Search in Google Scholar

2. Rui, Y, Huang, TS, Ortega, M, Mehrotra, S. Relevance feedback: a power tool for interactive content-based image retrieval. IEEE Trans Circ Syst Video Technol 1998;8:644–55.10.1109/76.718510Search in Google Scholar

3. Sclaroff, S, Taycher, L, Cascia, ML. ImageRover: content-based image browser for the World Wide Web. In Proceedings of IEEE Workshop on Content-Based Access of image and video Libraries, 1997; 2–9.10.1109/IVL.1997.629714Search in Google Scholar

4. Muneesawang, P, Guan, L. Automatic machine interactions for content-based image retrieval using a self-organizing tree map architecture. IEEE Trans Neural Network 2002;13:821–34. https://doi.org/10.1109/tnn.2002.1021883.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

5. Djeraba, C. Association and content-based retrieval. IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng 2002;15:118–35.10.1109/TKDE.2003.1161586Search in Google Scholar

6. Yoshitaka, A, Ichikawa, T. A survey on content-based retrieval for multimedia databases. IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng 1999;11:81–93. https://doi.org/10.1109/69.755617.Search in Google Scholar

7. Cox, MML, Minka, TP, Papathomas, TV, Yianilos, PN. The Bayesian image retrieval system, PicHunter: theory, implementation, and psychophysical experiments. IEEE Trans Image Process 2000;9:20–37. https://doi.org/10.1109/83.817596.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

8. Zhu, L, Ran, A, Zhang, A. Theory of keyblock-based image retrieval. ACM Trans Inf Syst 2002;20:224–57. https://doi.org/10.1145/506309.506313.Search in Google Scholar

9. Carson, BS, Greenspan, H, Malik, J. Region-based 1251 image querying. In Proceeding Of IEEE Workshop on Content-Based Access of image and video Libraries, 1997; 42–9.10.1109/IVL.1997.629719Search in Google Scholar

10. Hua, KA, Vu, K, Oh, JH. SamMatch: a flexible and efficient sampling-bared image retrieval technique for large image databases. In Proceedings of the 7th ACM Int. Conf. on multimedia, 1999; 225–34.10.1145/319463.319610Search in Google Scholar

11. Cho, SR, Lee, JY. A human oriented image retrieval system using interactive genetic algorithm. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 2002;32:452–8.10.1109/TSMCA.2002.802812Search in Google Scholar

12. Aggarwal, G, Ashwin, TV, Ghosal, S. An image retrieval system with automatic query modification. IEEE Trans Multimed 2002;4:201–14. https://doi.org/10.1109/tmm.2002.1017734.Search in Google Scholar

13. Zhang, C, Chen, T. An active learning framework for content-based information retrieval. IEEE Trans Multimed 2002;4:260–8.10.1109/TMM.2002.1017738Search in Google Scholar

14. Guo, GD, lain, AK, Ma, WY, Zhang, HJ. Learning similarity measure for natural image retrieval with relevance feedback. IEEE Trans Neural Network 2002;13:811–82. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNN.2002.1021882.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

15. Flickner, M, Sawhney, H, Niblack, W, Ashley, J, Huang, Q, Dom, B, et al.. Query by image and video content: the QBIC system. Computer 1995;28:23–32. https://doi.org/10.1109/2.410146.Search in Google Scholar

16. Picard, RW, Kabir, T. Finding similar patterns in large image Database. In IEEE Int. Conf. on Acoustics; Speech, and Signal processing; 1993;vol 5:161–4 pp.10.1109/ICASSP.1993.319772Search in Google Scholar

17. Chowdhury, M, Das, S, Kundu, M. Effective classification of radiographic medical images using LS-SVM and NSCT based retrieval system. In IEEE Int. Conf. On Computer and Devices for Communication; 2006.Search in Google Scholar

18. Bahadure, NB, Ray, AK, Thethi, HP. Image analysis for MRI based brain tumor detection and feature extraction using biologically inspired BWT and SVM. Int J Biomed Imag 2017;9749108:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/9749108.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

19. Purwar, RK, Srivastava, V. A novel feature based indexing algorithm for brain tumor MR-images. Int J Inf Technol 2020;12:1005–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41870-019-00412-9.Search in Google Scholar

20. Deepak, S, Ameer, P. Retrieval of brain MRI with tumor using contrastive loss based similarity on GoogLeNet encodings. Comput Biol Med 2020;125:1016–103993. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2020.103993.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

21. SasankVenkateswarlu, VVS. Brain tumor classification using modified kernel based softplus extreme learning machine. Multtimed Tools Appl 2021:11042.10.1007/s11042-020-10423-5Search in Google Scholar

22. Cheng, J. Brain tumor dataset. figshare. Dataset.; 2017.Search in Google Scholar

23. Yang, W, Feng, Q, Yu, M, Lu, Z, Gao, Y, Xu, Y, et al.. Content‐based retrieval of brain tumor in contrast‐enhanced MRI images using tumor margin information and learned distance metric. Med Phys 2012;39:6929–42. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.4754305.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

24. Huang, M, Yang, W, Yu, M, Lu, Z, Feng, Q, Chen, W. Retrieval of brain tumors with region-specific bag-of-visual-words representations in contrast-enhanced MRI images. Comput Math Methods Med 2012;2012. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/280538.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

25. Huang, M, Yang, W, Wu, Y, Jiang, J, Gao, Y, Chen, Y, et al.. Content-based image retrieval using spatial layout information in brain tumor T1-weighted contrast-enhanced MR images. PloS One 2014;9:e102754. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0102754.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

26. Cheng, J, Yang, W, Huang, M, Huang, W, Jiang, J, Zhou, Y, et al.. Retrieval of brain tumors by adaptive spatial pooling and Fisher vector representation. PloS One 2014;11:e0157112. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0157112.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

27. Golshani, L, Pasha, E, Yari, G. Some properties of Renyi entropy and Renyi entropy rate. Inf Sci 2009;179:2426–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2009.03.002.Search in Google Scholar

28. Asmhan, FH, Zahir, MH, Cailin, D. An information-theoretic measure for face recognition: comparison with structural similarity. Int J Adv Res Artif Intell 2014;3.10.14569/IJARAI.2014.031102Search in Google Scholar

29. Pass, G, Zabih, R. Comparing images using joint hists. Multimed Syst 1999;7:234–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s005300050125.Search in Google Scholar

30. Büttcher, S, Clarke, CL, Cormack, GV. Information retrieval: implementing and evaluating search engines. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press; 2010.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2021-02-07
Accepted: 2021-04-23
Published Online: 2021-05-24

© 2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 21.5.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/bams-2021-0011/html
Scroll to top button