Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter October 1, 2019

On the Parameter Choice in the Multilevel Augmentation Method

  • Suhua Yang , Xingjun Luo EMAIL logo , Chunmei Zeng , Zhihai Xu and Wenyu Hu

Abstract

In this paper, we apply the multilevel augmentation method for solving ill-posed Fredholm integral equations of the first kind via iterated Tikhonov regularization method. The method leads to fast solutions of the discrete regularization methods for the equations. The convergence rates of iterated Tikhonov regularization are achieved by using a modified parameter choice strategy. Finally, numerical experiments are given to illustrate the efficiency of the method.

MSC 2010: 65J20; 65R20

Award Identifier / Grant number: 11761010

Award Identifier / Grant number: 11361005

Award Identifier / Grant number: 61502107

Award Identifier / Grant number: 11661008

Award Identifier / Grant number: 61863001

Award Identifier / Grant number: 20181BAB202021

Funding statement: Supported in part by the Natural Science Foundation of China under grants 11761010, 11361005, 61863001 and 11661008, and Natural Science Foundation of Jiangxi, China under grant 20181BAB202021.

References

[1] Z. Chen, S. Cheng, G. Nelakanti and H. Yang, A fast multiscale Galerkin method for the first kind ill-posed integral equations via Tikhonov regularization, Int. J. Comput. Math. 87 (2010), no. 1–3, 565–582. 10.1080/00207160802155302Search in Google Scholar

[2] Z. Chen, Y. Jiang, L. Song and H. Yang, A parameter choice strategy for a multi-level augmentation method solving ill-posed operator equations, J. Integral Equations Appl. 20 (2008), no. 4, 569–590. 10.1216/JIE-2008-20-4-569Search in Google Scholar

[3] Z. Chen, C. A. Micchelli and Y. Xu, The Petrov–Galerkin method for second kind integral equations. II. Multiwavelet schemes, Adv. Comput. Math. 7 (1997), no. 3, 199–233. 10.1023/A:1018994802659Search in Google Scholar

[4] Z. Chen, Y. Xu and H. Yang, A multilevel augmentation method for solving ill-posed operator equations, Inverse Problems 22 (2006), no. 1, 155–174. 10.1088/0266-5611/22/1/009Search in Google Scholar

[5] H. W. Engl, M. Hanke and A. Neubauer, Regularization of Inverse Problems, Math. Appl. 375, Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, 1996. 10.1007/978-94-009-1740-8Search in Google Scholar

[6] C. W. Groetsch, On the asymptotic order of accuracy of Tikhonov regularization, J. Optim. Theory Appl. 41 (1983), no. 2, 293–298. 10.1007/BF00935225Search in Google Scholar

[7] C. W. Groetsch, The Theory of Tikhonov Regularization for Fredholm Equations of the First Kind, Res. Notes Math. 105, Pitman, Boston, 1984. Search in Google Scholar

[8] U. Hämarik, On the parameter choice in the regularized Ritz–Galerkin method, Eesti Tead. Akad. Toimetised Füüs. Mat. 42 (1993), no. 2, 133–143. 10.3176/phys.math.1993.2.01Search in Google Scholar

[9] J. T. King and D. Chillingworth, Approximation of generalized inverses by iterated regularization, Numer. Funct. Anal. Optim. 1 (1979), no. 5, 499–513. 10.1080/01630567908816031Search in Google Scholar

[10] S. Lu and S. V. Pereverzev, Regularization Theory for Ill-posed Problems. Selected Topics, Inverse Ill-posed Probl. Ser. 58, De Gruyter, Berlin, 2013. 10.1515/9783110286496Search in Google Scholar

[11] X. Luo, F. Li and S. Yang, A posteriori parameter choice strategy for fast multiscale methods solving ill-posed integral equations, Adv. Comput. Math. 36 (2012), no. 2, 299–314. 10.1007/s10444-011-9229-9Search in Google Scholar

[12] X. J. Luo, F. C. Li and S. H. Yang, A fast iterative method for solving ill-posed integral equations based on an optimal projection method, Math. Numer. Sin. 33 (2011), no. 1, 1–14. Search in Google Scholar

[13] P. Maaß, S. V. Pereverzev, R. Ramlau and S. G. Solodky, An adaptive discretization for Tikhonov–Phillips regularization with a posteriori parameter selection, Numer. Math. 87 (2001), no. 3, 485–502. 10.1007/PL00005421Search in Google Scholar

[14] C. A. Micchelli and Y. Xu, Using the matrix refinement equation for the construction of wavelets on invariant sets, Appl. Comput. Harmon. Anal. 1 (1994), no. 4, 391–401. 10.1006/acha.1994.1024Search in Google Scholar

[15] C. A. Micchelli and Y. Xu, Reconstruction and decomposition algorithms for biorthogonal multiwavelets, Multidimens. Systems Signal Process. 8 (1997), no. 1–2, 31–69. 10.1007/978-1-4757-5922-8_2Search in Google Scholar

[16] R. Plato, The Galerkin scheme for Lavrentiev’s m-times iterated method to solve linear accretive Volterra integral equations of the first kind, BIT 37 (1997), no. 2, 404–423. 10.1007/BF02510220Search in Google Scholar

[17] R. Plato and G. Vainikko, On the regularization of projection methods for solving ill-posed problems, Numer. Math. 57 (1990), no. 1, 63–79. 10.1007/BF01386397Search in Google Scholar

[18] A. Rieder, A wavelet multilevel method for ill-posed problems stabilized by Tikhonov regularization, Numer. Math. 75 (1997), no. 4, 501–522. 10.1007/s002110050250Search in Google Scholar

[19] S. G. Solodky, The optimal approximations for stationary iterated Tikhonov method, East J. Approx. 10 (2004), no. 1–2, 189–200. Search in Google Scholar

[20] A. N. Tikhonov and V. Y. Arsenin, Solutions of Ill-posed Problems, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1977. Search in Google Scholar

[21] C. Zeng, X. Luo, S. Yang and F. Li, A parameter choice strategy for a multilevel augmentation method in iterated Lavrentiev regularization, J. Inverse Ill-Posed Probl. 26 (2018), no. 2, 153–170. 10.1515/jiip-2017-0006Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2018-07-29
Revised: 2019-09-15
Accepted: 2019-09-16
Published Online: 2019-10-01
Published in Print: 2020-07-01

© 2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 27.4.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/cmam-2018-0189/html
Scroll to top button