About the authors
Martin Kohler is Creative Space Lead at Leuphana University and Strategic Advisor at Helmholtz-Zentrum Hereon in Geesthacht. He was coordinator of the ahoi.digital Network of Labs, researcher at the CSTI and teaches at Leuphana University in Lüneburg-Germany. Interested in transdisciplinary collaborations, digital technologies and transformative science he is member of diverse research programs on climate science, urban development, artificial intelligence and has a profound experience in organizing and conducting international workshops in the realms of urban complexity and worked for universities in Prague, Boston, Rotterdam, Seoul, São Paulo, London.
Prof. Dr. Ricardo Usbeck is Professor of Information Systems, in particular Artificial Intelligence and Explainability, at Leuphana University Lüneburg. He works in and leads several national and international research projects on knowledge graphs, large language models, chatbots and AI for social good. He is interested in transformation-related domains such as sustainability and creative spaces for technology. Ricardo Usbeck tries to build a bridge between research and application.
Prof. Dr. Janick Edinger is professor of distributed operating systems at the University of Hamburg, Germany. He received his PhD from the University of Mannheim. He also studied at the Taiwan National University and the University of Alberta, Canada, and completed research stays at the University of British Columbia, Canada, Hong Kong Polytechnical University, and Georgia State University, Atlanta, USA. His research interests include distributed computing, edge AI, and pervasive systems.
References
[1] M. Kohler, et al.., “Lab Cultures – Hochschullabore im Kontext von Wissenstransfer und digitaler Innovation,” in Transferinnovationen und Innovationstransfer zwischen Wissenschaft und Wirtschaft: Grundlagen, Erkenntnisse und Praxisbeispiele, M. A. Pfannstiel, and A. Dautovic, Eds., Wiesbaden, Springer Fachmedien, 2023, pp. 523–546.10.1007/978-3-658-37157-9_27Search in Google Scholar
[2] G. Schiuma and F. Santarsiero, “Innovation labs as organisational catalysts for innovation capacity development: a systematic literature review,” Technovation, vol. 123, 2023, Art. no. 102690. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2023.102690.Search in Google Scholar
[3] S. Schmidt, et al.., Open Creative Labs in Deutschland, Berlin, IRS, 2016.Search in Google Scholar
[4] D. Schuurman, et al.., “A fourfold typology of living labs: an empirical investigation amongst the ENoLL community,” in 2013 International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation (ICE) & IEEE International Technology Management Conference, 2013, pp. 1–11.10.1109/ITMC.2013.7352697Search in Google Scholar
[5] G. Bachmann, “Silicon valley,” in Nach der Revolution: ein Brevier digitaler Kulturen. Duisburger Dialoge, Berlin, Tempus Corporate GmbH, 2017, pp. 65–76.Search in Google Scholar
[6] C. Heinekamp, “Introduction: laboratory typologies,” in The Sustainable Laboratory Handbook, E. Dittrich, Ed., Weinheim, Germany, Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, 2015, pp. 3–12.10.1002/9783527337095.ch1Search in Google Scholar
[7] R. Oppedisano, “Innovative FabLabs,” in Collaborative Spaces and FabLabs: A Global Organisational and Collaborative Network, R. Oppedisano, Ed., Cham, Switzerland, Springer Nature, 2024, pp. 31–40.10.1007/978-3-031-62829-0_4Search in Google Scholar
[8] S. L. Star and J. R. Griesemer, “Institutional ecology, ‘translations’ and boundary objects: amateurs and professionals in berkeley’s museum of vertebrate zoology, 1907-39,” Soc. Stud. Sci., vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 387–420, 1989. https://doi.org/10.1177/030631289019003001.Search in Google Scholar
© 2024 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
