Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter Saur February 15, 2024

Forschungsdaten für Forschungssynthesen am Beispiel des Metavorhabens digi-ebf

  • Carolin Keller EMAIL logo and Nick Gerrit Hasche

Literatur

Beelmann, Andreas (2014). Möglichkeiten und Grenzen systematischer Evidenzkumulation durch Forschungssynthesen in der Bildungsforschung. Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft, 17 (S4), 55–78.10.1007/s11618-014-0509-2Search in Google Scholar

Booth, Andrew; Sutton, Anthea & Papaioannou, Diana (2016). Systematic approaches to a successful literature review (Second edition). Los Angeles: SAGE.Search in Google Scholar

Centre for Reviews and Dissemination (2009). CRD’s guidance for undertaking reviews in healthcare (Systematic reviews, 3. ed.). York: York Publ. Services.Search in Google Scholar

Cochrane Information Specialist Support Team (2023, 28. März). Cochrane Information Specialists’ Handbook. Verfügbar unter https://training.cochrane.org/resource/cochrane-information-specialists-handbook.Search in Google Scholar

Collaboration for Environmental Evidence (2023, 28. März). Guidelines and Standards for Evidence synthesis in Environmental Management. (Version 5.0) [07.09.2022].Search in Google Scholar

Cooper, Harris; Hedges, Larry V. & Valentine, Jeffrey C. (2019). The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis: Russell Sage Foundation.10.7758/9781610448864Search in Google Scholar

EPPI Centre (2003). Review Guidelines for Extracting Data and Quality Assessing Primary Studies in Educational Research. Version 0.9.7.Search in Google Scholar

Gough, David & Oliver, Sandy (2017). An introduction to systematic reviews (2nd edition). Los Angeles: SAGE.10.53841/bpsptr.2017.23.2.95Search in Google Scholar

Grant, Maria J. & Booth, Andrew (2009). A typology of reviews. An analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Information and Libraries Journal, 26, 91–108.10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.xSearch in Google Scholar

Higgins, J. P. T.; Thomas, J.; Chandler, J.; Cumpston, M. S.; Li, T.; Page, M. J. & Welch, V. A. (Hrsg.) (2022). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Version 6.3, 2022 (Wiley Cochrane Ser, 2nd ed.). Newark: John Wiley & Sons.Search in Google Scholar

Institute of Medicine (2011). Finding What Works in Health Care: Standards for Systematic Reviews (Eden, J., Levit, L., Berg, A. & Morton, S., Hrsg.). Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US).Search in Google Scholar

Joanna Briggs Institute (2020). Critical Appraisal Checklist for Systematic Reviews and Research Syntheses. Critical Appraisal tools for use in JBI Systematic Reviews.Search in Google Scholar

Kugley, Shannon; Wade, Anne; Thomas, James; Mahood, Quenby; Jørgensen, Anne‐Marie Klint; Hammerstrøm, Karianne & Sathe, Nila (2017). Searching for studies. A guide to information retrieval for Campbell systematic reviews. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 13 (1), 1–73. doi: 10.4073/cmg.2016.1.10.4073/cmg.2016.1Search in Google Scholar

Meert, Deborah; Torabi, Nazi & Costella, John (2016). Impact of librarians on reporting of the literature searching component of pediatric systematic reviews. Journal of the Medical Library Association: JMLA, 104 (4), 267.10.3163/1536-5050.104.4.004Search in Google Scholar

Opheim, Elin; Andersen, Per Normann; Jakobsen, Marianne; Aasen, Bjørn & Kvaal, Kari (2019). Poor Quality in Systematic Reviews on PTSD and EMDR – An Examination of Search Methodology and Reporting. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1558.10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01558Search in Google Scholar

Page, Matthew J. & Moher, David (2017). Evaluations of the uptake and impact of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement and extensions: a scoping review. Systematic reviews, 6 (1), 263.10.1186/s13643-017-0663-8Search in Google Scholar

Petticrew, Mark & Roberts, Helen (2006). Systematic reviews in the social sciences. A practical guide. Malden: Blackwell.10.1002/9780470754887Search in Google Scholar

Rethlefsen, Melissa L.; Farrell, Ann M.; Trzasko, Leah C. Osterhaus & Brigham, Tara J. (2015). Librarian co-authors correlated with higher quality reported search strategies in general internal medicine systematic reviews. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 68 (6), 617–626. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.11.025.10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.11.025Search in Google Scholar

Rethlefsen, Melissa L., et al. (2021). PRISMA-S: an extension to the PRISMA Statement for Reporting Literature Searches in Systematic Reviews. Systematic reviews, 10 (1), 39. doi: 10.1186/s13643-020-01542-z.10.1186/s13643-020-01542-zSearch in Google Scholar

Sutton, Anthea; Clowes, Mark; Preston, Louise & Booth, Andrew (2019). Meeting the review family. Exploring review types and associated information retrieval requirements. Health Information and Libraries Journal, 36 (3), 202–222. doi: 10.1111/hir.12276.10.1111/hir.12276Search in Google Scholar

Yaylali, Ibrahim Ethem & Alaçam, Tayfun (2016). Critical Assessment of Search Strategies in Systematic Reviews in Endodontics. Journal of Endodontics, 42 (6), 854–860. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2016.02.018.10.1016/j.joen.2016.02.018Search in Google Scholar

Zawacki-Richter, Olaf; Kerres, Michael; Bedenlier, Svenja; Bond, Melissa & Buntins, Katja (Hrsg.) (2020). Systematic Reviews in Educational Research: Methodology, Perspectives and Application. Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden.10.1007/978-3-658-27602-7Search in Google Scholar

Online erschienen: 2024-02-15
Erschienen im Druck: 2024-02-29

© 2024 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 24.1.2025 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/iwp-2023-2050/html
Scroll to top button