Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter February 1, 2018

Pricing barrier options in the Heston model using the Heath–Platen estimator

  • Sema Coskun and Ralf Korn ORCID logo EMAIL logo

Abstract

Both barrier options and the Heston stochastic volatility model are omnipresent in real-life applications of financial mathematics. In this paper, we apply the Heath–Platen (HP) estimator (as first introduced by Heath and Platen in [12]) to price barrier options in the Heston model setting as an alternative to conventional Monte Carlo methods and PDE based methods. We demonstrate the superior performance of the HP estimator via numerical examples and explain this performance by a detailed look at the underlying theoretical concept of the HP estimator.

MSC 2010: 91G60

Funding statement: This work was supported by the DFG-research training group 1932 “Stochastic models for innovations in the engineering sciences” of which Sema Coskun has been a doctoral researcher and Ralf Korn is the spokesperson. Both gratefully acknowledge the support of the DFG. The contents of this work is based on parts of the first author’s dissertation at the Department of Mathematics of TU Kaiserslautern.

A Appendix

To be able to present one example of derivation of the Greeks of a down-and-out call option, we start with giving the BS pricing formula of the relevant option. The formula is given in [11] as

V ( t , T , K , H ) = { A - C if  H < K , B - D if  H > K ,

where

A = S e - q ( T - t ) Φ ( x 1 ) - K e - r ( T - t ) Φ ( x 1 - σ T - t ) ,
B = S e - q ( T - t ) Φ ( x 2 ) - K e - r ( T - t ) Φ ( x 2 - σ T - t ) ,
C = S e - q ( T - t ) Φ ( y 1 ) ( H S ) 2 γ + 2 - K e - r ( T - t ) Φ ( y 1 - σ T - t ) ( H S ) 2 γ ,
D = S e - q ( T - t ) Φ ( y 2 ) ( H S ) 2 γ + 2 - K e - r ( T - t ) Φ ( y 2 - σ T - t ) ( H S ) 2 γ ,

with γ = r - q - 1 2 σ 2 σ 2 and

x 1 = ln ( S K ) + ( r - q + σ 2 2 ) ( T - t ) σ ( T - t ) , x 2 = ln ( S H ) + ( r - q + σ 2 2 ) ( T - t ) σ ( T - t ) ,
y 1 = ln ( H 2 S K ) + ( r - q + σ 2 2 ) ( T - t ) σ ( T - t ) , y 2 = ln ( H S ) + ( r - q + σ 2 2 ) ( T - t ) σ ( T - t ) .

Since we have a piecewise formula conditioned on the barrier level against the strike price, we derive the Greeks also in two parts. First, we consider the case K > H , where the pricing formula is equal to A - C . The explicit form of the vega value is given by

A σ = S e - q ( T - t ) ( T - t ) ϕ ( x 1 ) ,
C σ = S e - q ( T - t ) ( T - t ) ϕ ( y 1 ) ( H S ) 2 γ + 2 + 2 ln ( H S ) γ σ C

and, finally,

V call do σ = A σ - C σ .

Now, we deal with the derivatives of the second case K < H , where the pricing formula is B - D . We have

B σ = S e - q ( T - t ) ϕ ( x 2 ) ( K H x 2 σ - x 4 σ ) ,
D σ = e - q ( T - t ) ϕ ( y 2 ) ( H S ) 2 γ + 1 ( K y 2 σ - H y 4 σ ) + 2 γ σ ln ( H S ) D .

Eventually, we get the value for the vega for B - D by

V call do σ = B σ - D σ .

The remaining second order Greeks can be obtained in a similar manner, see also [4].

References

[1] M. Broadie, P. Glasserman and S. Kou, A continuity correction for discrete barrier options, Math. Finance 7 (1997), no. 4, 325–349. 10.1111/1467-9965.00035Search in Google Scholar

[2] M. Broadie, P. Glasserman and S. G. Kou, Connecting discrete and continuous path-dependent options, Finance Stoch. 3 (1999), no. 1, 55–82. 10.1007/s007800050052Search in Google Scholar

[3] M. Broadie and O. Kaya, Exact simulation of stochastic volatility and other affine jump diffusion processes, Oper. Res. 54 (2006), no. 2, 217–231. 10.1287/opre.1050.0247Search in Google Scholar

[4] S. Coskun, Application of the Heath–Platen Estimator in Pricing Barrier and Bond Options, PhD thesis, Department of Mathematics, University of Kaiserslautern, Germany, 2017. Search in Google Scholar

[5] S. Desmettre and R. Korn, Computationally challenging problems in Finance, FPGA Based Accelerators for Financial Applications, Springer, Heidelberg (2015), 1–32. 10.1007/978-3-319-15407-7_1Search in Google Scholar

[6] J.-P. Fouque and C.-H. Han, Variance reduction for Monte Carlo methods to evaluate option prices under multi-factor stochastic volatility models, Quant. Finance 4 (2004), no. 5, 597–606. 10.1080/14697680400000041Search in Google Scholar

[7] J.-P. Fouque, G. Papanicolaou, R. Sircar and K. Solna, Multiscale stochastic volatility asymptotics, Multiscale Model. Simul. 2 (2003), no. 1, 22–42. 10.1137/030600291Search in Google Scholar

[8] J.-P. Fouque and T. A. Tullie, Variance reduction for Monte Carlo simulation in a stochastic volatility environment, Quant. Finance 2 (2002), no. 1, 24–30. 10.1088/1469-7688/2/1/302Search in Google Scholar

[9] H. Geman, N. El Karoui and J.-C. Rochet, Changes of numéraire, changes of probability measure and option pricing, J. Appl. Probab. 32 (1995), no. 2, 443–458. 10.2307/3215299Search in Google Scholar

[10] P. Glasserman, Monte Carlo Methods in Financial Engineering. Stochastic Modelling and Applied Probability, Appl. Math. (New York) 53, Springer, New York, 2004. 10.1007/978-0-387-21617-1Search in Google Scholar

[11] E. G. Haug, The Complete Guide to Option Pricing Formulas, 2nd ed., McGraw-Hill, USA, 2007. Search in Google Scholar

[12] D. Heath and E. Platen, A variance reduction technique based on integral representations, Quant. Finance 2 (2002), no. 5, 362–369. 10.1088/1469-7688/2/5/305Search in Google Scholar

[13] D. Heath and E. Platen, A Monte Carlo method using PDE expansions for a diversified equity index model, Research Paper 350, Quantitative Finance Research Center, University of Technology, Sydney, 2014. Search in Google Scholar

[14] S. L. Heston, A closed-form solution for options with stochastic volatility with applications to bond and currency options, Rev. Financial Stud. 6 (1993), no. 2, 327–343. 10.1093/rfs/6.2.327Search in Google Scholar

[15] R. Korn, E. Korn and G. Kroisandt, Monte Carlo Methods and Models in Finance and Insurance, Chapman & Hall/CRC Financ. Math. Ser., CRC Press, Boca Raton, 2010. 10.1201/9781420076196Search in Google Scholar

[16] R. Lord, R. Koekkoek and D. Van Dijk, A comparison of biased simulation schemes for stochastic volatility models, Quant. Finance 10 (2010), no. 2, 177–194. 10.1080/14697680802392496Search in Google Scholar

[17] R. C. Merton, Theory of rational option pricing, Bell J. Econom. Manag. Sci. 4 (1973), 141–183. 10.2307/3003143Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2017-08-31
Accepted: 2018-01-06
Published Online: 2018-02-01
Published in Print: 2018-03-01

© 2022 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 20.5.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/mcma-2018-0004/html
Scroll to top button