Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter October 4, 2018

Urodynamics and diagnosis of urinary incontinence

  • Klaudia Stangel-Wójcikiewicz ORCID logo EMAIL logo , Małgorzata Migdał , Krzysztof Skotniczny , Tadeusz Hessel and Piotr Chłosta

Abstract

The urinary incontinence diagnostic process should include a medical history focused on ailments related to it and their impact on the quality of patient’s life. The lack of proper control over the function of the lower urinary tract creates a lot of troubles for sufferers and prevents them from living an active professional, social, and family life. The patient with a suspicion of urinary incontinence is recommended to record in a voiding diary the number of mictions per day, the volume of urine, and episodes of incontinence. The invasive test called urodynamics is based on cystometry, profilometry, and uroflowmetry. A urodynamic examination performed in patients with incontinence allows for correct diagnosis and proposal of specific surgical or pharmacological treatment.

  1. Author contributions: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.

  2. Research funding: None declared.

  3. Employment or leadership: None declared.

  4. Honorarium: None declared.

  5. Competing interests: The funding organization(s) played no role in the study design; in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; or in the decision to submit the report for publication.

References

[1] Abrams P, Cardozo L, Wagg A, Wein A, editors. Incontinence, 6th ed. Bristol: International Continence Society, 2017.Search in Google Scholar

[2] Nygaard I, Barber MD, Burgio KL, Kenton K, Meikle S, Schaffer J, et al. Prevalence of symptomatic pelvic floor disorders in US women. J Am Med Assoc 2008;300:1311–6.10.1001/jama.300.11.1311Search in Google Scholar

[3] Thuroff JW, Abrams P, Andersson KE, Artibani W, Chapple CR, Drake MJ, et al. EAU guidelines on urinary incontinence. Eur Urol 201159:387–400.10.1016/j.eururo.2010.11.021Search in Google Scholar

[4] Smith A, Bevan D, Douglas HR, James D. Management of urinary incontinence in women: summary of updated NICE guidance. Br Med J 2013;347:f5170.10.1136/bmj.f5170Search in Google Scholar

[5] Kobashi KC, Albo ME, Dmochowski RR, Ginsberg DA, Goldman HB, Gomelsky A, et al. Surgical treatment of female stress urinary incontinence: AUA/SUFU guideline. J Urol 2017;198:875–83.10.1016/j.juro.2017.06.061Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[6] Bradley C, Rahn D, Nygaard I, Barber MD, Nager CW, Kenton KS, et al. The questionnaire for urinary incontinence diagnosis (QUID): validity and responsiveness to change in women undergoing non-surgical therapies for treatment of stress predominant urinary incontinence. Neurourol Urodyn 2010;29:727–34.10.1016/S0022-5347(09)60247-0Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[7] Sansoni J, Hawthorne G, Fleming G, Owen E, Marosszeky N. The technical manual for the revised incontinence and patient satisfaction tools. Wollongong: Centre for Health Service Development, University of Wollongong, 2011.Search in Google Scholar

[8] D’Ancona CA, Bassani JW, Querne FA, Carvalho J, Oliveira RR, Netto NR Jr. New method for minimally invasive urodynamic assessment in men with lower urinary tract symptoms. Urology 2008;71:75–8.10.1016/j.urology.2007.08.036Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[9] Stangel-Wojcikiewicz K, Kabzińska-Turek M. Nawrotowe nietrzymanie moczu. Nawrotowe nietrzymanie moczu. Warszawa: PZWL, 2017:276–80.Search in Google Scholar

[10] Serati M, Finazzi-Agro E. Urodynamics before surgery for stress urinary incontinence: the urodynamic examination is still one of the best friends of the surgeon and of patients with stress urinary incontinence. Eur Urol Focus 2016;2:272–3.10.1016/j.euf.2015.10.006Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[11] Sirls LT, Richter HE, Litman HJ, Kenton K, Lemack GE, Lukacz ES, et al. The effect of urodynamic testing on clinical diagnosis, treatment plan and outcomes in women undergoing stress urinary incontinence surgery. J Urol 2013;189:204–9.10.1016/j.juro.2012.09.050Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[12] Giarenis I, Cardozo L. What is the value of urodynamic studies before stress incontinence surgery? Br J Obstet Gynaecol 2013;120:130–2.10.1111/1471-0528.12102Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[13] Serati M, Giarenis I, Meschia M, Cardozo L. Role of urodynamics before prolapse surgery. Int Urogynecol J 2015;26:165–8.10.1007/s00192-014-2534-3Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[14] Rosier PF, Schaefer W, Lose G, Goldman HB, Guralnick M, Eustice S, et al. International Continence Society good urodynamic practices and terms 2016: urodynamics, uroflowmetry, cystometry, and pressure-flow study. Neurourol Urodyn 2017;36:1243–60.10.1002/nau.23124Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[15] Valdevenito JP, Águila F, Naser M, Manríquez V, Wenzel C, Díaz JP. Urodynamic study in women with pure stress urinary incontinence. Actas Urol Esp 2015;39:98–103.10.1016/j.acuroe.2015.01.007Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[16] Agrawal M, Joshi M. Urodynamic patterns after traumatic spinal cord injury. J Spinal Cord Med 2015;38:128–33.10.1179/2045772313Y.0000000136Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[17] Adelowo A, Dessie S, Rosenblatt PL. The role of preoperative urodynamics in urogynecologic procedures. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2014;21:217–22.10.1016/j.jmig.2013.10.002Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[18] Stangel-Wojcikiewicz K, Piwowar M, Jach R, Majka M, Basta A. Quality of life assessment in female patients 2 and 4 years after muscle-derived cell transplants for stress urinary incontinence treatment. Ginekol Pol 2016;87:183–9.10.17772/gp/61330Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[19] D’Ancona C, Bassani J, Almeida J. Noninvasive urodynamic evaluation. Int Neurourol J 2012;16:116–21.10.5213/inj.2012.16.3.116Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[20] Tseng LH, Liang CC, Chang YL, Lee SJ, Lloyd LK, Chen CK. Postvoid residual urine in women with stress incontinence. Neurourol Urodyn 2008;27:48–51.10.1002/nau.20463Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[21] Oelke M, Hofner K, Jonas U, de la Rosette JJ, Ubbink DT, Wijkstra H. Diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive tests to evaluate bladder outlet obstruction in men: detrusor wall thickness, uroflowmetry, postvoid residual urine, and prostate volume. Eur Urol 2007;52:827–34.10.1016/j.eururo.2006.12.023Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[22] Clement KD, Lapitan MC, Omar MI, Glazener CM. Urodynamic studies for management of urinary incontinence in children and adults: a short version Cochrane systematic review and metaanalysis. Neurourol Urodyn 2015;34:407–12.10.1002/nau.22584Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[23] Suskind AM, Cox L, Clemens JQ, Oldendorf A, Stoffel JT, Malaeb B, et al. The value of urodynamics in an academic specialty referral practice. Urology 2017;105:48–53.10.1016/j.urology.2017.02.049Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[24] Dillon BE, Zimmern PE. When are urodynamics indicated in patients with stress urinary incontinence? Curr Urol Rep 2012;13:379–84.10.1007/s11934-012-0270-0Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[25] Yande SD, Joglekar OV, Joshi M. Role of urodynamics in stress urinary incontinence: a critical appraisal. J Midlife Health 2016;7:119–25.10.4103/0976-7800.191016Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Received: 2018-05-30
Accepted: 2018-09-19
Published Online: 2018-10-04

©2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 26.4.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/bams-2018-0017/html
Scroll to top button