Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter Oldenbourg September 17, 2021

Abstraction NBTI model

  • Stephan Adolf

    Stephan Adolf received a B. Sc. in Chemistry and Physics, B. Sc in Computer Science and a M. Ed. in Chemistry and Physics. In 2018 he joined the RTG SCARE and started working on NBTI aging in the Division of Embedded Hardware/Software Systems at the University of Oldenburg.

    EMAIL logo
    and Wolfgang Nebel

    Wolfgang Nebel is full professor at the University of Oldenburg. He holds a Dipl.-Ing. in EE and a Dr.-Ing. degree in CS. Nebel is IEEE fellow and spokesperson of the ICT Section of the German National Academy of Science and Engineering. He served for 15 years as Chairman of the OFFIS – Institute of Information Technology. He is Chairman of edacentrum and a member of the Main Board of bitkom and its-mobility.

Abstract

Negative Bias Temperature Instability (NBTI) is one of the major transistor aging effects, possibly leading to timing failures during run-time of a system. Thus one is interested in predicting this effect during design time. In this work an Abstraction NBTI model is introduced reducing the state space of trap-based NBTI models using two abstraction parameters, applying a state transformation to incorporate variable stress conditions. This transformation is faster than traditional approaches. Currently the conversion into estimated threshold voltage damages is a very time consuming process.

ACM CCS:

Award Identifier / Grant number: DFG-GRK 1765/2

Funding statement: This research is funded by the German Research Foundation through the Research Training Group “SCARE: System Correctness under Adverse Conditions” (DFG-GRK 1765/2), https://www.uni-oldenburg.de/en/scare/. The simulations were partly performed on the HPC Cluster CARL at the University of Oldenburg (Germany), funded by the DFG through its Major Research Instrumentation Program (INST 184/157-1 FUGG) and the Ministry of Science and Culture (MWK) of the Lower Saxony State.

About the authors

Stephan Adolf

Stephan Adolf received a B. Sc. in Chemistry and Physics, B. Sc in Computer Science and a M. Ed. in Chemistry and Physics. In 2018 he joined the RTG SCARE and started working on NBTI aging in the Division of Embedded Hardware/Software Systems at the University of Oldenburg.

Prof. Dr.-Ing. Wolfgang Nebel

Wolfgang Nebel is full professor at the University of Oldenburg. He holds a Dipl.-Ing. in EE and a Dr.-Ing. degree in CS. Nebel is IEEE fellow and spokesperson of the ICT Section of the German National Academy of Science and Engineering. He served for 15 years as Chairman of the OFFIS – Institute of Information Technology. He is Chairman of edacentrum and a member of the Main Board of bitkom and its-mobility.

Acknowledgment

The author thanks Kim Grüttner for proofreading the manuscript of the paper.

References

1. H. Reisinger, O. Blank, W. Heinrigs, A. Muhlhoff, W. Gustin and C. Schlünder. Analysis of NBTI Degradation- and Recovery-Behavior Based on Ultra Fast VT-Measurements. Proceedings of the IEEE IRPS, pp. 448–453, San Jose, 2006.10.1109/RELPHY.2006.251260Search in Google Scholar

2. T. Grasser, B. Kaczer, W. Goes, T. Aichinger, P. Hehenberger and M. Nelhiebel. A two-stage model for negative bias temperature instability. Proceedings of the IEEE IRPS, pp. 33–44, Montreal, 2009.10.1109/IRPS.2009.5173221Search in Google Scholar

3. T. Grasser, H. Reisinger, P.-J. Wagner, F. Schanovsky, W. Goes and B. Kaczer. The time dependent defect spectroscopy (TDDS) for the characterization of the bias temperature instability. Proceedings of the IEEE IRPS, pp. 16–25, Anaheim, 2010.10.1109/IRPS.2010.5488859Search in Google Scholar

4. T. Grasser et al. Characterization and modeling of charge trapping: From single defects to devices. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on IC Design Technology, pp. 1–4, Austin, 2014.10.1109/ICICDT.2014.6838620Search in Google Scholar

5. G. Rzepa et al. Efficient physical defect model applied to PBTI in high-κ stacks. Proceedings of the IEEE IRPS, pp. XT-11.1–XT-11.6, Monterey, 2017.10.1109/IRPS.2017.7936425Search in Google Scholar

6. H. Reisinger, T. Grasser, W. Gustin and C. Schlünder. The statistical analysis of individual defects constituting NBTI and its implications for modeling DC- and AC-stress. Proceedings of the IEEE IRPS, pp. 7–15, Anaheim, 2010.10.1109/IRPS.2010.5488858Search in Google Scholar

7. M. Toledano-Luque et al. Response of a single trap to AC negative Bias Temperature stress. Proceedings of the IEEE IRPS, pp. 4A.2.1–4A.2.8, Monterey, 2011.Search in Google Scholar

8. A. Unutulmaz, D. Helms, R. Eilers, M. Metzdorf, B. Kaczer and W. Nebel. Analysis of NBTI effects on high frequency digital circuits. Proceedings of DATE, pp. 223–228, Dresden, 2016.10.3850/9783981537079_0226Search in Google Scholar

9. T. Grasser, B. Kaczer, H. Reisinger, P. J. Wagner and M. Toledano-Luque. On the frequency dependence of the bias temperature instability. Proceedings of the IEEE IRPS, pp. XT.8.1–XT.8.7, Anaheim, 2012.10.1109/IRPS.2012.6241938Search in Google Scholar

10. H. Reisinger, T. Grasser, K. Ermisch, H. Nielen, W. Gustin and C. Schlünder. Understanding and modeling AC BTI. Proceedings of the IEEE IRPS, pp. 6A.1.1–6A.1.8, Monterey, 2011.Search in Google Scholar

11. R. Kwasnick, A. E. Papathanasiou, M. Reilly, A. Rashid, B. Zaknoon, and J. Falk. Determination of CPU use conditions. Proceedings of the IEEE IRPS, pp. 2C.3.1–2C.3.6, Monterey, 2011.Search in Google Scholar

12. H. Reisinger, T. Grasser, and C. Schlünder. A study of NBTI by the statistical analysis of the properties of individual defects in pMOSFETS. Proceedings of the IEEE IIRW, pp. 30–35, South Lake Tahoe, 2009.10.1109/IRWS.2009.5383037Search in Google Scholar

13. K. O. Jeppson and C. M. Svensson. Negative bias stress of MOS devices at high electric fields and degradation of MNOS devices. J. Appl. Phys., 48(5):2004–2014, 1977.10.1063/1.323909Search in Google Scholar

14. S. Ogawa and N. Shiono. Generalized diffusion-reaction model for the low-field charge-buildup instability at the Si-SiO2 interface. Phys. Rev. B, 51(7):4218–4230, 1995.10.1103/PhysRevB.51.4218Search in Google Scholar

15. T. Grasser et al. The Paradigm Shift in Understanding the Bias Temperature Instability: From Reaction – Diffusion to Switching Oxide Traps. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices, 58(11):3652–3666, 2011.10.1109/TED.2011.2164543Search in Google Scholar

16. T. Grasser. Stochastic charge trapping in oxides: From random telegraph noise to bias temperature instabilities. Microelectron. Reliab., 52(1):39–70, 2012.10.1016/j.microrel.2011.09.002Search in Google Scholar

17. D. K. Schroder and J. A. Babcock. Negative bias temperature instability: Road to cross in deep submicron silicon semiconductor manufacturing. J. Appl. Phys., 94(1):1–18, 2003.10.1063/1.1567461Search in Google Scholar

18. Y. Cao et al. Cross-Layer Modeling and Simulation of Circuit Reliability. IEEE TCAD, 33(1):8–23, 2014.10.1109/TCAD.2013.2289874Search in Google Scholar

19. J. B. Velamala et al. Compact Modeling of Statistical BTI Under Trapping/Detrapping. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices, 60(11):3645–3654, 2013.10.1109/TED.2013.2281986Search in Google Scholar

20. P. J. Mohr, D. B. Newell, and B. N. Taylor. CODATA recommended values of the fundamental physical constants: 2014. Rev. Mod. Phys., 88(3), 2016.10.6028/NIST.SP.961r2015Search in Google Scholar

21. B. Kaczer, P. J. Roussel, T. Grasser, and G. Groeseneken. Statistics of Multiple Trapped Charges in the Gate Oxide of Deeply Scaled MOSFET Devices–Application to NBTI. IEEE Electron Device Lett., 31(5):411–413, 2010.10.1109/LED.2010.2044014Search in Google Scholar

22. M. J. Kirton and M. J. Uren. Noise in solid-state microstructures: A new perspective on individual defects, interface states and low-frequency (1/f) noise. Adv. Phys., 38(4):367–468, 1989.10.1080/00018738900101122Search in Google Scholar

23. G. Pobegen and T. Grasser. On the Distribution of NBTI Time Constants on a Long, Temperature-Accelerated Time Scale. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices, 60(7):2148–2155, 2013.10.1109/TED.2013.2264816Search in Google Scholar

24. S. Kirchhoff. Ueber den Durchgang eines elektrischen Stromes durch eine Ebene, insbesondere durch eine kreisförmige. Annalen der Physik, 140(4):497–514, 1845.10.1002/andp.18451400402Search in Google Scholar

25. K. J. Millman and M. Aivazis. Python for Scientists and Engineers. Comput Sci Eng, 13(2):9–12, 2011.10.1109/MCSE.2011.36Search in Google Scholar

26. T. E. Oliphant. Python for Scientific Computing. Comput Sci Eng, 9(3):10–20, 2007.10.1109/MCSE.2007.58Search in Google Scholar

27. S. van der Walt, S. C. Colbert, and G. Varoquaux. The NumPy Array: A Structure for Efficient Numerical Computation. Comput Sci Eng, 13(2):22–30, 2011.10.1109/MCSE.2011.37Search in Google Scholar

28. M. C. Hansen, H. Yalcin, and J. P. Hayes. Unveiling the ISCAS-85 benchmarks: a case study in reverse engineering. IEEE Des Test Comput, 16(3):72–80, 1999.10.1109/54.785838Search in Google Scholar

29. M. Toledano-Luque et al. Temperature and voltage dependences of the capture and emission times of individual traps in high-k dielectrics. Microelectron. Eng., 88(7):1243–1246, 2011.10.1016/j.mee.2011.03.097Search in Google Scholar

30. T. Grasser. Bias Temperature Instability for Devices and Circuits, New York: Springer, 2014.10.1007/978-1-4614-7909-3Search in Google Scholar

31. J. D. Jackson. Classical electrodynamics, 3rd ed. New York: Walter de Gruyter, 1999.10.1119/1.19136Search in Google Scholar

32. C. Gerthsen and D. Meschede. Gerthsen Physik, 23rd ed. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 2006.Search in Google Scholar

33. C. B. Lang and N. Pucker. Mathematische Methoden in der Physik, 3rd ed. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 2016.10.1007/978-3-662-49313-7Search in Google Scholar

34. C. E. Mortimer and U. Müller. Chemie – das Basiswissen der Chemie, 8th ed. Stuttgart: Georg Thieme Verlag, 2003.Search in Google Scholar

35. R. Reis, Y. Cao, and G. Wirth. Circuit Design for Reliability, Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 2015.10.1007/978-1-4614-4078-9Search in Google Scholar

36. S. Paul and R. Paul. Elektromagnetische Felder und ihre Anwendungen, Berlin: Springer Vieweg, 2012.Search in Google Scholar

37. P. A. Tipler, G. Mosca, and J. Wagner. Physik: für Wissenschaftler und Ingenieure, 7th ed. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 2015.10.1007/978-3-642-54166-7Search in Google Scholar

38. R. J. Eilers. Abstraction of aging models for high level degradation prediction. Dissertation, Universität Oldenburg, Oldenburg, 2017. [Online]. Available: http://oops.uni-oldenburg.de/3212/. [Accessed: 26-Jun.-2018].Search in Google Scholar

39. M. C. Metzdorf. Integration einer Zuverlässigkeitsbewertung und -optimierung in den RT- und Gate-Level Entwurfsfluss. Dissertation, Universität Oldenburg, Oldenburg, 2018. [Online]. Available: http://oops.uni-oldenburg.de/3642/. [Accessed: 27-Jul.-2018].Search in Google Scholar

40. G. Rzepa. Microscopic Modeling of NBTI in MOS Transistors. Diploma thesis, Vienna University of Technology, Wien, 2013. [Online]. Available: http://repositum.tuwien.ac.at/obvutwhs/content/titleinfo/1633772. [Accessed: 05-Jul.-2018].Search in Google Scholar

41. T. L. Tewksbury. Relaxation effects in MOS devices due to tunnel exchange with near-interface oxide traps. Dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, 1992. [Online]. Available: http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/13238. [Accessed: 11-Mar.-2019].Search in Google Scholar

42. MoRV project. Modelling Reliability under Variability. 01-Jan-2014. [Online]. Available: https://morv-project.eu/wordpress/. [Accessed: 19-Sep.-2018].Search in Google Scholar

43. Global TCAD Solutions GmbH. TCAD Simulations. 11-Jul-2018. [Online]. Available: http://www.globaltcad.com/. [Accessed: 19-Sep.-2018].Search in Google Scholar

44. Python Software Foundation. Python Release Python 2.7.14. 2017. [Online]. Available: https://www.python.org/downloads/release/python-2714/. [Accessed: 02-Jan.-2018].Search in Google Scholar

45. Intel. IntelCore™ 2 Duo Processor E7200 (3M Cache, 2.53 GHz, 1066 MHz FSB) Product Specifications. 2008. [Online]. Available: https://ark.intel.com/content/www/us/en/ark/products/35348/intel-core-2-duo-processor-e7200-3m-cache-2-53-ghz-1066-mhz-fsb.html. [Accessed: 09-May.-2019].Search in Google Scholar

46. L. W. Nagel and D. O. Pederson. SPICE (Simulation Program with Integrated Circuit Emphasis). EECS Department, University of California, Berkeley, UCB/ERL M382, Apr. 1973. [Online]. Available: http://www2.eecs.berkeley.edu/Pubs/TechRpts/1973/22871.html. [Accessed: 16-Aug.-2019].Search in Google Scholar

47. NGSPICE. NGSPICE circuit simulator. 2017. [Online]. Available: http://ngspice.sourceforge.net/. [Accessed: 05-Feb.-2018].Search in Google Scholar

48. Arizona State University. Predictive Technology Model (PTM), SPICE Transistor Modelle. 2011. [Online]. Available: http://ptm.asu.edu/. [Accessed: 05-Feb.-2018].Search in Google Scholar

49. Synopsys, Inc. Design Compiler. 2018. [Online]. Available: https://www.synopsys.com/. [Accessed 05-Feb.-2018].Search in Google Scholar

50. Nangate Inc. NanGate – The Standard Cell Library Optimization Company. 2018. [Online]. Available: http://www.nangate.com/. [Accessed 19-Sep.-2018].Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2021-02-22
Revised: 2021-08-10
Accepted: 2021-08-24
Published Online: 2021-09-17
Published in Print: 2021-11-25

© 2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 26.4.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/itit-2021-0005/html
Scroll to top button