Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A reliable and energy-efficient storage system with erasure coding cache

  • Published:
Frontiers of Information Technology & Electronic Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In modern energy-saving replication storage systems, a primary group of disks is always powered up to serve incoming requests while other disks are often spun down to save energy during slack periods. However, since new writes cannot be immediately synchronized into all disks, system reliability is degraded. In this paper, we develop a high-reliability and energy-efficient replication storage system, named RERAID, based on RAID10. RERAID employs part of the free space in the primary disk group and uses erasure coding to construct a code cache at the front end to absorb new writes. Since code cache supports failure recovery of two or more disks by using erasure coding, RERAID guarantees a reliability comparable with that of the RAID10 storage system. In addition, we develop an algorithm, called erasure coding write (ECW), to buffer many small random writes into a few large writes, which are then written to the code cache in a parallel fashion sequentially to improve the write performance. Experimental results show that RERAID significantly improves write performance and saves more energy than existing solutions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amazon, 2007. Amazon S3: Object Storage Built to Store and Retrieve Any Amount of Data from Anywhere. http://aws.amazon.com/s3/

    Google Scholar 

  • Amur, H., Cipar, J., Gupta, V., et al., 2010. Robust and flexible power-proportional storage. Proc. 1st ACM Symp. on Cloud Computing, p.217–228. https://doi.org/10.1145/1807128.1807164

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhadkamkar, M., Guerra, J., Useche, L., et al., 2009. BORG: Block-reORGanization for self-optimizing storage systems. Proc. Usenix Conf. on File and Storage Technologies, p.183–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blaum, M., Brady, J., Bruck, J., et al., 1994. EVENODD: an optimal scheme for tolerating double disk failures in RAID architectures. Proc. 21st Int. Symp. on Computer Architecture, p.245–254. https://doi.org/10.1109/isca.1994.288145

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Borthaku, D., 2010. What is Apache Hadoop? http:// hadoop.apache.org/

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Y., Hsu, W., Young, H., 2000. Logging RAID— an approach to fast, reliable, and low-cost disk arrays. Euro-Par, p.1302–1312. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44520-x_182

    Google Scholar 

  • Colarelli, D., Grunwald, D., 2002. Massive arrays of idle disks for storage archives. Proc. ACM/IEEE Conf. on Supercomputing, p.1–11. https://doi.org/10.1109/sc.2002.10058

    Google Scholar 

  • Corbett, P., English, B., Goel, A., et al., 2004. Row-diagonal parity for double disk failure correction. Proc. 3rd USENIX Conf. on File and Storage Technologies, p.1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Energy, 2012. NETL shares computing speed, efficiency to tackle barriers. Fossil Energy Today, 1(6):1–3.

  • EMC, 2008. ATMOS: Big. Smart. Elastic. http://www.emc. com/storage/atmos/atmos.htm

  • Eom, H., Hollingsworth, J.K., 2000. Speed vs. accuracy in simulation for I/O-intensive applications. Proc. 14th Int. Parallel and Distributed Processing Symp., p.315–322. https://doi.org/10.1109/ipdps.2000.846001

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghemawat, S., Gobioff, H., Leung, S., 2003. The Google File System. Proc. 19th ACM Symp. on Operating Systems Principles, p.29–43. https://doi.org/10.1145/945445.945450

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu, Y., Yang, Q., 1996. DCD—disk caching disk: a new approach for boosting I/O performance. ACM SIGARCH Comput. Archit. News, 24(2):169–178. https://doi.org/10.1145/232974.232991

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, D., Wang, J., 2004. EERAID: energy-efficient redundant and inexpensive disk array. Proc. 11th ACM SIGOPS European Workshop, p.29. https://doi.org/10.1145/1133572.1133577

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, D., Wang, J., 2006. eRAID: a queuing model based energy saving policy. Proc. IEEE Int. Symp. on Modeling, Analysis, and Simulation of Computer and Telecommunication Systems, p.77–86. https://doi.org/10.1109/mascots.2006.23

    Google Scholar 

  • Lu, L., Varman, P.J., Wang, J., 2007. DiskGroup: energy efficient disk layout for RAID1 systems. Proc. Int. Conf. on Networking, Architecture, and Storage, p.233–242. https://doi.org/10.1109/nas.2007.21

    Google Scholar 

  • Mao, B., Feng, D., Jiang, H., et al., 2008. GRAID: a green RAID storage architecture with improved energy efficiency and reliability. Proc. IEEE Int. Symp. on Modeling, Analysis, and Simulation of Computer and Telecommunication Systems, p.113–120. https://doi.org/10.1109/mascot.2008.4770574

    Google Scholar 

  • Menon, J., 1995. A performanee comparison of RAID-5 and log-struetured arrays. Proc. 4th IEEE In. Symp. on High Performance Distributed Computing, p.167–178. https://doi.org/10.1109/hpdc.1995.518707

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Patterson, D.A., Gibson, G., Katz, R.H., 1988. A case for redundant arrays of inexpensive disks (RAID). Proc. ACM SIGMOD Int. Conf. on Management of Data, p.109–116. https://doi.org/10.1145/971701.50214

    Google Scholar 

  • Plank, J.S., Xu, L.H., 2006. Optimizing Cauchy Reed- Solomon codes for fault-tolerant storage applications. Proc. 5th Int. Symp. on Network Computing and Applications, p.173–180. https://doi.org/10.1109/nca.2006.43

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinheiro, E., Bianchini, R., 2004. Energy conservation techniques for disk array-based servers. Proc. 18th Annual Int. Conf. on Supercomputing, p.68–78. https://doi.org/10.1145/1006209.1006220

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinheiro, E., Weber, W.D., Barroso, L.A., 2007. Failure trends in a large disk drive population. Proc. 5th USENIX Conf. on File and Storage Technologies, p.17–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soundararajan, G., Prabhakaran, V., Balakrishnan, M., et al., 2010. Extending SSD lifetimes with disk-based write caches. Proc. 8th USENIX Conf. on File and Storage Technologies, p.101–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stodolsky, D., Gibson, G., Holland, M., 1993. Parity logging overcoming the small write problem in redundant disk arrays. ACM SIGARCH Comput. Architect. News, 21(2):64–75. https://doi.org/10.1145/173682.165143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thereska, E., Donnelly, A., Narayanan, D., 2011. Sierra: practical power-proportionality for data center storage. Proc. 6th Conf. on Computer Systems, p.169–182. https://doi.org/10.1145/1966445.1966461

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, J., Zhu, H.J., Li, D., 2008. eRAID: conserving energy in conventional disk-based RAID system. IEEE Trans. Comput., 57(3):359–374. https://doi.org/10.1109/tc.2007.70821

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Weil, S., Brandt, S.A., Miller, E.L., et al., 2006. Ceph: a scalable, high-performance distributed file system. Proc. 7th Conf. on Operating Systems Design and Implementation, p.307–320.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkes, J., Golding, R., Staelin, R., et al., 1996. The HP AutoRAID hierarchical storage system. ACM Trans. Comput. Syst., 14(1):108–136. https://doi.org/10.1145/225535.225539

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xin, Q., Miller, E.L., Schwarz, T., et al., 2003. Reliability mechanisms for very large storage systems. Proc. 20th IEEE/11th NASA Goddard Conf. on Mass Storage Systems and Technologie, p.146–156. https://doi.org/10.1109/mass.2003.1194851

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Xu, L.H., Bruck, J., 1999. X-code: MDS array codes with optimal encoding. IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory, 45(1):272–276. https://doi.org/10.1109/18.746809

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Yue, Y., Tian, L., Jiang, H., et al., 2010. RoLo: a rotated logging storage architecture for enterprise data centers. Proc. IEEE 30th Int. Conf. on Distributed Computing Systems, p.293–304. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDCS.2010.22

    Google Scholar 

  • Yue, Y., He, B., Tian, L., et al., 2016. Rotated logging storage architectures for data centers: models and optimizations. IEEE Trans. Comput., 65(1):203–215. https://doi.org/10.1109/tc.2015.2417539

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, Q., Chen, Z., Tan, L., et al., 2005. Hibernator: helping disk arrays sleep through the winter. Proc. 20th ACM Symp. on Operating Systems Principles, p.177–190. https://doi.org/10.1145/1095809.1095828

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ji-guang Wan.

Additional information

Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 61472152, 61432007, 61572209, and 61300047), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, China (No. 2015QN069), the Director Fund of Wuhan National Laboratory for Optoelectronics (WNLO), and the MOE Key Laboratory of Data Storage System, China

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wan, Jg., Li, Dp., Qu, Xy. et al. A reliable and energy-efficient storage system with erasure coding cache. Frontiers Inf Technol Electronic Eng 18, 1370–1384 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1631/FITEE.1600972

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1631/FITEE.1600972

Key words

CLC number