Skip to main content
Log in

A sparse matrix model-based optical proximity correction algorithm with model-based mapping between segments and control sites

  • Published:
Journal of Zhejiang University SCIENCE C Aims and scope Submit manuscript

An Erratum to this article was published on 11 June 2011

An Erratum to this article was published on 11 June 2011

Abstract

Optical proximity correction (OPC) is a key step in modern integrated circuit (IC) manufacturing. The quality of model-based OPC (MB-OPC) is directly determined by segment offsets after OPC processing. However, in conventional MB-OPC, the intensity of a control site is adjusted only by the movement of its corresponding segment; this scheme is no longer accurate enough as the lithography process advances. On the other hand, matrix MB-OPC is too time-consuming to become practical. In this paper, we propose a new sparse matrix MB-OPC algorithm with model-based mapping between segments and control sites. We put forward the concept of ‘sensitive area’. When the Jacobian matrix used in the matrix MB-OPC is evaluated, only the elements that correspond to the segments in the sensitive area of every control site need to be calculated, while the others can be set to 0. The new algorithm can effectively improve the sparsity of the Jacobian matrix, and hence reduce the computations. Both theoretical analysis and experiments show that the sparse matrix MB-OPC with model-based mapping is more accurate than conventional MB-OPC, and much faster than matrix MB-OPC while maintaining high accuracy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Chen, Y., Wu, K., Shi, Z., Yan, X.L., 2007. A feasible model-based OPC algorithm using Jacobian matrix of intensity distribution functions. SPIE, 6520:65204C1–65204C10. [doi:10.1117/12.711763]

    Google Scholar 

  • Choi, S.H., Je, A.Y., Hong, J.S., Yoo, M.H., Kong, J.T., 2006. Meef-based correction to achieve OPC convergence of low-k1 lithography with strong OAI. SPIE, 6154: 61540P-1–61540P-9. [doi:10.1117/12.656894]

    Google Scholar 

  • Cobb, N.B., Granik, Y., 2002. Model-based OPC using the meef matrix. SPIE, 4889:1281–1292. [doi:10.1117/12.467435]

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cobb, N.B., Zakhor, A., 1995. Fast sparse aerial image calculation for OPC. SPIE, 2621:534–545. [doi:10.1117/12.228208]

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cobb, N.B., Zakhor, A., Miloslavsky, E., 1996. Mathematical and CAD framework for proximity correction. SPIE, 2726:208–222. [doi:10.1117/12.240907]

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Granik, Y., 2005. Generalized mask error enhancement factor theory. J. Microlithogr. Microfabr. Microsyst., 4(2): 023001-1–023001-10. [doi:10.1117/1.1898066]

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herold, K., Chen, N., Stobert, I.P., 2006. Managing high-accuracy and fast convergence in OPC. SPIE, 6349:634924-1–634924-8. [doi:10.1117/12.686725]

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopkins, H.H., 1953. On the diffraction theory of optical images. Proc. R. Soc. A, 217(1130):408–432. [doi:10.1098/rspa.1953.0071]

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Painter, B., Melvin, L.S.III, Rieger, M.L., 2004. Classical control theory applied to OPC correction segment convergence. SPIE, 5377:1198–1206. [doi:10.1117/12.537586]

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schellenberg, F.M., 2004. Resolution enhancement technology: the past, the present, and extensions for the future. SPIE, 5377:1–20. [doi:10.1117/12.548923]

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schellenberg, F.M., Boksha, V., Cobb, N., Lai, J.C., Chen, C.H., Mack, C., 1999. Impact of mask errors on full chip error budgets. SPIE, 3679:261–272. [doi:10.1117/12.354339]

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Terasawa, T., 2000. Subwavelength optical lithography. SPIE, 4181:8–16. [doi:10.1117/12.395721]

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Schoot, J., Finders, J., Schenau, K.V.I., Klaassen, M., Buijk, C., 1999. Mask error factor: causes and implications for process latitude. SPIE, 3679:250–260. [doi:10.1117/12.354338]

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weeks, R.Jr., 2001. Resolution Enhancement Techniques. SPIE Press, Bellingham, Washington, USA, p.18-30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Word, J., Torres, A., Lacour, P., 2005. Advanced layout fragmentation and simulation schemes for model based OPC. SPIE, 5754:1159–1168. [doi:10.1117/12.598848]

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu, P., Pan, D.Z., 2007a. TIP-OPC: a New Topological Invariant Paradigm for Pixel Based Optical Proximity Correction. Proc. IEEE/ACM Int. Conf. on Computer-Aided Design, p.847–853. [doi:10.1109/ICCAD.2007.4397370]

  • Yu, P., Pan, D.Z., 2007b. A Novel Intensity Based OPC Algorithm with Speedup in Lithography Simulation. Proc. IEEE/ACM Int. Conf. on Computer-Aided Design, p.854–859. [doi:10.1109/ICCAD.2007.4397371]

  • Yu, P., Shi, S.X., Pan, D.Z., 2007. True process variation aware optical proximity correction with variational lithography modeling and model calibration. J. Microlithogr. Microfabr. Microsyst., 6(3):031004. [doi:10.1117/1.2752814]

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bin Lin.

Additional information

An erratum to this article can be found at http://dx.doi.org/10.1631/jzus.C10e0219

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lin, B., Yan, Xl., Shi, Z. et al. A sparse matrix model-based optical proximity correction algorithm with model-based mapping between segments and control sites. J. Zhejiang Univ. - Sci. C 12, 436–442 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1631/jzus.C1000219

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1631/jzus.C1000219

Key words

CLC number

Navigation