Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-p2v8j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-11T05:44:29.859Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The consistency of the axiom of universality for the ordering of cardinalities

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 March 2014

Marco Forti
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Matematica, Università di Pisa, 56100 PISA, Italy
Furio Honsell
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Informatica, Università di Torino, 10125 Torino, Italy

Extract

T. Jech [4] and M. Takahashi [7] proved that given any partial ordering R in a model of ZFC there is a symmetric submodel of a generic extension of where R is isomorphic to the injective ordering on a set of cardinals.

The authors raised the question whether the injective ordering of cardinals can be universal, i.e. whether the following axiom of “cardinal universality” is consistent:

CU. For any partially ordered set (X, ≼) there is a bijection f:X → Y such that

(i.e. xy iff ∃g: f(x)f(y) injective). (See [1].)

The consistency of CU relative to ZF0 (Zermelo-Fraenkel set theory without foundation) is proved in [2], but the transfer method of Jech-Sochor-Pincus cannot be applied to obtain consistency with full ZF (including foundation), since CU apparently is not boundable.

In this paper the authors define a model of ZF + CU as a symmetric submodel of a generic extension obtained by forcing “à la Easton” with a class of conditions which add κ generic subsets to any regular cardinal κ of a ground model satisfying ZF + V = L.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Symbolic Logic 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1]Forti, M. and Honsell, F., Can cardinal ordering be universal? (abstract), this Journal, vol. 49 (1984), p. 691.Google Scholar
[2]Forti, M. and Honsell, F., A model where cardinal ordering is universal, Zeitschrift für Mathematische Logik und Grundlagen der Mathematik (to appear).Google Scholar
[3]Forti, M. and Honsell, F., Set theory with free construction principles, Annali detta Scuola Normale Superiore di Pisa, Classe de Scienze, ser. 4, vol. 10 (1983), pp. 493522.Google Scholar
[4]Jech, T., On ordering of cardinalities, Bulletin de l'Académie Polonaise des Sciences, Série des Sciences Mathématiques, Astronomiques et Physiques, vol. 14 (1966), pp. 293296.Google Scholar
[5]Jech, T., The axiom of choice, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1973.Google Scholar
[6]Jech, T., Set theory, Academic Press, New York, 1978.Google Scholar
[7]Takahashi, M., On incomparable cardinals, Commentarii Mathematici Universitatis Sancii Pauli, vol. 16 (1968), pp. 129142.Google Scholar
[8]Truss, J., Convex sets of cardinals, Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society, ser. 3, vol. 27 (1973), pp. 577599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar