Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-gtxcr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T11:25:26.299Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Boolean algebras and orbits of the lattice of r.e sets modulo the finite sets

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 March 2014

Peter Cholak*
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin 53706

Extract

An important program in the study of the structure the lattice of r.e. sets modulo finite sets, is the classification of the orbits under Aut(), the automorphism group of , If Φ ∈ Aut() and Φ(We) =* Wh(e) for all e ∈ ω, then h is called a presentation of Φ. Define Autχ() to be the class of those elements of Aut() that have a presentation in the class of functions X, where for instance X might be the class of Δn functions for n ∈ ω. If Φ ∈ Autx() then we will say that Φ is an X-automorphism. Note that we only need to consider Δn- and Πn-orbits and automorphisms since if f is a Σn-presentation, then f is a total function and therefore Δn.

Definition. If X is a class of functions and ⊆ {Wi: i < ω}, then is an X-orbit iff is an orbit under Aut() and for all A, B there is a Φ ∈ Autx() satisfying Φ(A) =* B. (Here Φ: .)

Harrington proved that the creative sets form a Δ0-orbit and Soare proved that the maximal sets form Δ3-orbit. We will show that there is no Boolean algebra such that {A: A is r.e. and *(A) ≈ ] forms a Δ2-orbit, where *(A) is the principal filter of A in ; *(A) = {B: B ⊆* A & B}. The idea behind the proof of this theorem is very similar to the proof by Soare that maximal sets do not form a Δ2-orbit (see Soare [1974] or Soare [1987]).

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Symbolic Logic 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Friedberg, R. M. [1958], Three theorems on recursive enumeration: I: Decomposition. II: Maximal set. III: Enumeration without duplication, this Journal, vol. 23, pp. 309316.Google Scholar
Lachlan, A. H. [1968], On the lattice of recursively enumerable sets, Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 130, pp. 137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lerman, M., Shore, R. A., and Soare, R. I. [1978], r-maximal major subsets, Israel Journal of Mathematics, vol. 31, pp. 118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
W. Maass [1984], Orbits of hyperhypersimple sets, this Journal, vol. 49, pp. 5162.Google Scholar
Soare, R. I. [1974], Automorphisms of the lattice of recursively enumerable sets. Part I: Maximal sets, Annals of Mathematics, ser. 2 vol. 100 (1974), pp. 80120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soare, R. I. [1987], Recursively enumerable sets and degrees, Springer-Verlag, Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yates, C. E. M. [1965], Three theorems on the degree of recursively enumerable sets, Duke Mathematical Journal, vol. 32, pp. 461468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar