Skip to main content
Log in

Neural Network-Based Indoor Autonomously-Navigated AGV Motion Trajectory Data Fusion

  • Published:
Automatic Control and Computer Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Owing to the possibility of skidding with the ground in motion, the positioning of the autonomously-navigated automated guided vehicle (AGV) based on the wheel odometry (Odom) will bring errors, meanwhile, the rotation error is remarkably larger than the linear motion error. Three neural network methods were proposed in this study for the data fusion of the Odom and IMU, i.e., back-propagation (BP) neural network method, one-dimensional convolutional (1D-CNN) method, and long short-term memory (LSTM) method. The data fusion results of the Odom and IMU obtained by the extended Kalman filtering method were taken as a reference. The performance of the aforementioned three neural networks for the data fusion of the Odom and IMU was compared respectively. The experimental results indicate that all three neural networks can reduce the rotation error of AGV to some extent. It was also found that 1D-CNN possesses the fastest training speed, and the positioning accuracy is the highest when employing 1D-CNN for data fusion in the application.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 6.
Fig. 7.
Fig. 8.
Fig. 9.
Fig. 10.
Fig. 11.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Kohlbrecher, S., Von Stryk, O., Meyer, J., and Klingauf, U., A flexible and scalable slam system with full 3D motion estimation, 2011 IEEE International Symposium on Safety, Security, and Rescue Robotics, 2011.

  2. Grisetti, G., Stachniss, C., and Burgard, W., Improved techniques for grid mapping with Rao-Blackwellized particle filters, IEEE Trans. Rob., 2007, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 34–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Hess, W., Kohler, D., Rapp, H., and Andor, D., Real-time loop closure in 2D lidar slam, 2016 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 2016.

  4. Zhengang Li, Yong Xiong, and Lei Zhou, Ros-based indoor autonomous exploration and navigation wheelchair, 2017 10th International Symposium on Computational Intelligence and Design (ISCID), 2017.

  5. Megalingam, R.K., Ravi Teja, C., Sarath Sreekanth, and Akhil Raj, Ros based autonomous indoor navigation simulation using Slam algorithm, Int. J. Pure Appl. Math., 2018, vol. 118, no. 7, pp. 199–205.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Yazdkhasti, S. and Sasiadek, J.Z., Multi sensor fusion based on adaptive Kalman filtering, Adv. Aerosp. Guid. Navig. Control, 2018, pp. 317–333.

  7. Hairong Wang, Zhihong Deng, Bo Feng, et al., An adaptive Kalman filter estimating process noise covariance, Neurocomputing, 2017, vol. 223, pp. 12–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Sen Wang, Ronald Clark, Hongkai Wen, and Niki Trigoni, DeepVO: Towards end-to-end visual odometry with deep recurrent convolutional neural networks, 2017 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 2017.

  9. Zhou, T., Brown, M., Snavely, N., and Lowe, D.G., Unsupervised learning of depth and ego-motion from video, Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2017.

  10. Ruihao Li, Sen Wang, Zhiqiang Long, and Dongbing Gu, UndeepVO: Monocular visual odometry through unsupervised deep learning, 2018 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 2018.

  11. Clark, R., Sen Wang, Hongkai Wen, Markham, A., and Trigoni, N., Vinet: Visual-inertial odometry as a sequence-to-sequence learning problem, Thirty-First AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2017.

  12. Nicolai, A., Skeele, R., Eriksen, C., and Hollinger, G.A., Deep learning for laser based odometry estimation, RSS Workshop Limits and Potentials of Deep Learning in Robotics, 2016.

  13. Chi Li, Sen Wang, Yan Zhuang, and Fei Yan, Deep sensor fusion between 2D laser scanner and IMU for mobile robot localization, IEEE Sens. J., 2019.

  14. Siavash Hosseinyalamdary, Deep Kalman filter: Simultaneous multi-sensor integration and modelling; a GNSS/IMU case study, Sensors, 2018, vol. 18, no. 5, p.1316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Wang Rui, Research on Kalman Filtering Algorithm Based on DBN and Application in AGV, Jilin Univ., 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hochreiter, S. and Schmidhuber, J., Long short-term memory, Neural Comput., 1997, vol. 9, no. 8, pp. 1735–1780.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Diebel, J., Representing attitude: Euler angles, unit quaternions, and rotation vectors, Matrix, 2006, vol. 58, nos. 15–16, pp. 1–35.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work is supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province, China, project no. 2020A 1515011503.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lingwei Huang.

Ethics declarations

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yanming Quan, Huang, L., Ma, L. et al. Neural Network-Based Indoor Autonomously-Navigated AGV Motion Trajectory Data Fusion. Aut. Control Comp. Sci. 55, 334–345 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3103/S0146411621040076

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3103/S0146411621040076

Keywords:

Navigation