skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Bayesian probability of predictive agreement for comparing the outcome of two separate regressions

Journal Article · · Quality and Reliability Engineering International
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1002/qre.2284· OSTI ID:1463553
ORCiD logo [1];  [2];  [3]
  1. Univ. of San Francisco, San Francisco, CA (United States). Dept. of Mathematics and Statistics
  2. Saint Louis Univ., St. Louis MO (United States). College for Public Health and Social Justice
  3. Los Alamos National Lab. (LANL), Los Alamos, NM (United States)

The concept of a Bayesian probability of agreement was recently introduced to give the posterior probabilities that the response surfaces for two different groups are within δ of one another. For example, a difference of less than δ in the mean response at fixed levels of the predictor variables might be thought to be practically unimportant. In such a case, we would say that the mean responses are in agreement. The posterior probability of this is called the Bayesian probability of agreement. In this article, we quantify the probability that new response observations from two groups will be within δ for a continuous response, and the probability that the two responses agree completely for categorical cases such as logistic regression and Poisson regression. We call these Bayesian comparative predictive probabilities, with the former being the predictive probability of agreement. We use Markov chain Monte Carlo simulation to estimate the posterior distribution of the model parameters and then the predictive probability of agreement. Here, we illustrate the use of this methodology with three examples and provide a freely available R Shiny app that automates the computation and estimation associated with the methodology.

Research Organization:
Los Alamos National Lab. (LANL), Los Alamos, NM (United States)
Sponsoring Organization:
US Department of Homeland Security (DHS); USDOE
Grant/Contract Number:
AC52-06NA25396
OSTI ID:
1463553
Report Number(s):
LA-UR-17-31290
Journal Information:
Quality and Reliability Engineering International, Vol. 34, Issue 6; ISSN 0748-8017
Publisher:
WileyCopyright Statement
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Citation Metrics:
Cited by: 8 works
Citation information provided by
Web of Science

References (8)

The difference between “equivalent” and “not different” journal October 2015
Comparing the Reliability of Related Populations With the Probability of Agreement journal July 2016
Assessing agreement between two measurement systems: An alternative to the limits of agreement approach journal September 2015
Equivalence and Noninferiority Tests for Quality, Manufacturing and Test Engineers journal October 2014
A Method for Determining Equivalence in Industrial Applications journal March 2002
Quantifying similarity in reliability surfaces using the probability of agreement journal March 2017
Comparing the Reliability of Related Populations With the Probability of Agreement dataset April 2017
Comparing the Reliability of Related Populations With the Probability of Agreement [Supplemental Data] dataset April 2017

Cited By (1)

Bayesian probability of agreement for comparing the similarity of response surfaces journal April 2019

Similar Records

Bayesian probability of agreement for comparing the similarity of response surfaces
Journal Article · Mon Apr 08 00:00:00 EDT 2019 · Journal of Quality Technology · OSTI ID:1463553

SU-E-T-144: Bayesian Inference of Local Relapse Data Using a Poisson-Based Tumour Control Probability Model
Journal Article · Mon Jun 15 00:00:00 EDT 2015 · Medical Physics · OSTI ID:1463553

Bayesian projection pursuit regression
Journal Article · Sat Nov 04 00:00:00 EDT 2023 · Statistics and Computing · OSTI ID:1463553