skip to main content
research-article
Open Access

Formal Verification of Robotic Cell Injection systems up to 4-DOF using HOL Light

Authors Info & Claims
Published:01 July 2020Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Abstract

Cell injection is an approach used for the delivery of small sample substances into a biological cell and is widely used in drug development, gene injection, intracytoplasmic sperm injection and in-vitro fertilization. Robotic cell injection systems provide the automation of the process as opposed to the manual and semi-automated cell injection systems, which require expert operators and involve time consuming processes and also have lower success rates. The automation of the cell injection process is obtained by controlling the orientation and movement of its various components, like injection manipulator, microscope etc., and planning the motion of the injection pipette by controlling the force of the injection. The conventional techniques to analyze the cell injection process include paper-and-pencil proof and computer simulation methods. However, both these techniques suffer from their inherent limitations, such as, proneness to human error for the former and the approximation of the mathematical expressions involved in the numerical algorithms for the latter. Formal methods have the capability to overcome these limitations and can provide an accurate analysis of these cell injection systems. Model checking, i.e., a state-based formal method, has been recently used for analyzing these systems. However, it involves the discretization of the differential equations capturing the continuous dynamics of the system and thus compromises on the completeness of the analysis of these safety-critical systems. In this paper, we propose a higher-order-logic theorem proving (a deductive-reasoning based formal method) based framework for analyzing the dynamical behavior of the robotic cell injection systems upto 4-DOF. The proposed analysis, based on the HOL Light theorem prover, enabled us to identify some discrepancies in the simulation and model checking based analysis of the same robotic cell injection system.

References

  1. [AH17] Ayub MS, Hasan O (2017) Formal probabilistic analysis of a virtual fixture control algorithm for a surgical robot. In: Verification and evaluation of computer and communication systems, volume 10466 of LNCS, pp 1–16. SpringerGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. [BDA95] Bianco A, De Alfaro L (1995) Model checking of probabilistic and nondeterministic systems. I:n Foundations of software technology and theoretical computer science, volume 1026 of LNCS, pp 499–513. SpringerGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. [BGM+15] Bresolin DGeretti LMuradore RFiorini PVilla TFormal verification of robotic surgery tasks by reachability analysisMicroprocess Microsyst201539883684210.1016/j.micpro.2015.10.006Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. [CGP99] Clarke, E.M., Grumberg, O., Peled, D.: Model checking. MIT Press (1999)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. [CKNZ12] Clarke EM, Klieber W, Nováček M, Zuliani P (2012) Model checking and the state explosion problem. In: Tools for practical software verification, volume 7682 of LNCS, pp 1–30. SpringerGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. [Daw11] Dawood H (2011) Theories of interval arithmetic: mathematical foundations and applications. LAP Lambert Academic PublishingGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. [DPV13] Durán AJ, Pérez M, Varona JL (2013) The misfortunes of a mathematicians' Trio using computer algebra systems: can we trust? CoRR. arXiv:1312.3270Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. [FN16] Faroque M, Nizam S (2016) Virtual reality training for micro-robotic cell injection. Technical report, Deakin University, AustraliaGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. [Gor88] Gordon Michael JC (1988) HOL: a proof generating system for higher-order logic. In: VLSI specification, verification and synthesis, volume 35 of SECS, pp 73–128. SpringerGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. [Har96a] Harrison J (1996) HOL light: a tutorial introduction. In: Srivas M, Camilleri A (eds) Proceedings of the first international conference on formal methods in computer-aided design (FMCAD'96), volume 1166 of LNCS, pp 265–269. Springer-VerlagGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. [Har96b] Harrison J (1996) HOL light: a tutorial introduction. In: Formal methods in computer-aided design, volume 1166 of LNCS, pp 265–269. SpringerGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. [Har09] Harrison, J.: Handbook of practical logic and automated reasoning. Cambridge University Press (2009)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. [Har13] Harrison J(2013) The HOL light theory of euclidean space. J Autom Reason 1–18Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. [hol20a] HOL Light Multivariate Calculus (2020) https://github.com/jrh13/hol-light/blob/master/MultivariateGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. [hol20b] HOL Light Real Calculus (2020) https://github.com/jrh13/hol-light/blob/master/Multivariate/realanalysis.mlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. [hol20c] HOL Light Transcendentals (2020) https://github.com/jrh13/hol-light/blob/master/Multivariate/transcendentals.mlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. [hol20d] HOL Light Vectors and Matrices (2020) https://github.com/jrh13/hol-light/blob/master/Multivariate/vectors.mlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. [HSM+09] Huang HSun DMills JKLi WJCheng SHVisual-based impedance control of out-of-plane cell injection systemsTrans Autom Sci Eng20096356557110.1109/TASE.2008.2010013Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. [HSML06] Huang H, Sun D, Mills JK, Li Wen J (2006) A visual impedance force control of a robotic cell injection system. In: Robotics and biomimetics, pp 233–238. IEEEGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. [HT15] Hasan O, Tahar S (2015) Formal verification methods. In: Encyclopedia of information science and technology, pp 7162–7170. IGI Global PubGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. [KK04] Kuncova J, Kallio Pasi (2004) Challenges in capillary pressure microinjection. In: Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, volume 2, pp 4998–5001. IEEEGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. [KRPK13] Kouskoulas Y, Renshaw D, Platzer A, Kazanzides P (2013) Certifying the safe design of a virtual fixture control algorithm for a surgical robot. In: Hybrid systems: computation and control, pp 263–272. ACMGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. [Map20] Maple (2020) https://www.maplesoft.com/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. [Mat20] Mathematica (2020) https://www.wolfram.com/mathematica/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. [NFT+98] Nakayama TFujiwara HTastumi KFujita KHiguchi TMori TA new assisted hatching technique using a piezo-micromanipulatorFertil Steril199869478478810.1016/S0015-0282(98)00017-XGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. [NS94] Nethery JFSpong MWRobotica: a mathematica package for robot analysisIEEE Robot Autom Mag199411132010.1109/100.296449Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. [Pau96] Paulson, L.C.: ML for the working programmer. Cambridge University Press (1996)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. [Ras20] Rashid A (2020) Formal verification of robotic cell injection systems upto 4-DOF using HOL Light. http://save.seecs.nust.edu.pk/fvrcis/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. [RH17] Rashid A, Hasan O (2017) Formal analysis of robotic cell injection systems using theorem proving. In: Design, modeling, and evaluation of cyber physical systems, volume 11267 of LNCS, pp 127–141. SpringerGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. [RH18] Rashid A, Hasan O (2018) Formal modeling of robotic cell injection systems in higher-order logic. In: Formal verification of physical systems, volume 2307, pp 1–9. CEUR-WSGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. [SH17] Sardar MU, Hasan O (2017) Towards probabilistic formal modeling of robotic cell injection systems. In: Models for formal analysis of real systems, pp 271–282Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. [SL97] Sun D, Liu Y (1997) Modeling and impedance control of a two-manipulator system handling a flexible beam. In: Proceedings of 1997 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and automation, volume 2, pp 1787–1792. IEEEGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. [SN02] Sun YNelson BJBiological cell injection using an autonomous microrobotic systemRobot Res20022110–1186186810.1177/0278364902021010833Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. [YKY+99] Yanagida KKatayose HYazawa HKimura YKonnai KSato AThe usefulness of a piezo-micromanipulator in intracytoplasmic sperm injection in humansHum Reprod199914244845310.1093/humrep/14.2.448Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in

Full Access

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader