skip to main content
article

Improving partial parsing based on error-pattern analysis for a Korean grammar-checker

Published:01 December 2003Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

The main aim of this work is to make improvements to Mirine 2.2, a Korean grammar-checker that takes Korean language properties into account and to develop a system that satisfies user expectations. Particular attention is given to processing Korean texts that may contain users' grammatical and practical errors. In order to treat these errors efficiently, the system includes methods based on asymmetric relations from which partial parsing and the potential governing relationship are derived, implying the starting point for checking, the direction for parsing, and the limits of the scope for parsing.To organize partial parsing efficiently, the system requires an appropriate knowledge base. As its essential prerequisites, this study (a) considers the factors from which the various error types encountered while parsing various Korean texts arise; (b) extracts general patterns from the linguistic or extra-linguistic factors obtained in this manner; and (c) demonstrates how the system, based on a linguistic analysis, procures an adequate knowledge base for partial parsing to satisfy end-users. Mirine 2.2 achieves an F-measure of about 0.80 in detecting unknown erroneous words; an F-measure of about 0.98 when not considering unknown words; and 98.94% precision in correcting erroneous words.

References

  1. Allen, J. 1995. Natural Language Understanding. 2nd ed. Benjamin Cummings, Redwood City, CA. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Chae, Y.S. and KwonH.C. 1991. A dictionary-based morphological analysis, In Proceedings of the NLPRS, 141-147.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Comrie, B. 1989. Language Universals and Linguistic Typology. Blackwell, Cambridge, UK.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Cressels, D. 1995. Elements de Syntaxe Generale. PUF, Paris, France.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Francis, N. W. and Kucera, H. 1982. Frequency Analysis of English Usage: Lexicon and Grammar. Houghton Mifflin, Boston, MA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Heidorn, G. E. 2000. Intelligent writing assistance. In Handbook of Natural Language Processing, R. Dale, H. Moisl, and H. Somers, eds. Marcel Dekker, New York, 181-207.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Johanna, n. 1986. head-marking and dependent-marking grammar. language 62 (1986), 56-119.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Jurafsky, D. and Martin, J. H. 2000. Speech and Language Processing. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Kang, M.Y., Park, S.H., Yoon, A.S. and Kwon, H.C. 2002. Potential governing relationship and a Korean grammar checker using partial parsing. Lecture Note in Computer Science, IEA/AIE, 692-702. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Kang, S.S. 2002. Korean Morphological Analysis and Information Retrieval (Hangugeo Hyeongtaeso Bunseokgwa Jeongbo Geomsaek). Top Publisher, Seoul, Korea.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Kim, H.J., Park, D.I. and Kwon, H.C. 1997. Implementation of a Korean spelling and grammar checker using collocation of words and partial analysis of a sentence, In Proceedings of the IASTED, 208-211.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Kim, M.J., Kwon, H.C., and Yoon, A.S. 1996. Rule-based approach to Korean morphological disambiguation supported by statistical method. In Proceedings of the Eleventh PACLIC, 237-246.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Kwon, H.C. 1997 Current status and trend of NLP technologies in Korea. In Proceedings of the Korea-France Joint Workshop on Language Industries, 7-11.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Lee, B.G. 1993. hwagsilhi-wa hagsil-i. Hanjulgi Publisher, Seoul, Korea. LEE, H. B. 1988. Revised Korean spelling system. Korea Journal 28, 4 (1988),. 34-41.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Lee, H. B. 1988. Revised Korean spelling system. Korea Journal 28, 4 (1988),. 34-41.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Lee, H.Y. 1996. Korean Phonetics (Gugeo Eumseonghak). Taehaksa Publisher, Seoul, Korea.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Lim, H.S., Kim, J.D., and Lim, H.C. 1997. Part-of-speech tagging using complemental characteristics of linguistic knowledge and stochastic information. In Proceedings of the Ninth Conference on Hangul and Korean Information Processing, 102-108.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Melcuk, I. A. 1988. Dependency Syntax: Theory and Practice. State University of New York Press, Albany, NY.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Ministry of Culture and Tourism 2000. Revised Romanization of Korean http://www.mct.go.kr/english/K_about/Language04.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Nam, K.S. 1998. Standard Korean Grammar (Pyojun Gugeo Munbeomnon). 6th ed., revised and corrected. Top Publisher, Seoul, Korea.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Seo, K.J. and Choi, K.S. 1993. Korean parser using fuzzy dependency relations between word-phrases, In Proceedings of the Korea Information Science Society Fall Conference, 135-141Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Son, K.J., Hong, Y.K., Lee, J.H. Lee, G.B. 1994. Korean parser for dependency analysis among Eojeols. In Proceedings of the Korea Information Science Society Spring Conference, 135-141.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Spencer, A. 1991. Morphological Theory. Blackwell, Cambridge, UK.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Tesniere, L. 1959. Elements de Syntaxe Structurale. 2nd ed., revised and corrected. Klincksieck, Paris. France.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Improving partial parsing based on error-pattern analysis for a Korean grammar-checker

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in

      Full Access

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader