skip to main content
10.1145/1016707.1016714acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescommConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article
Free Access

On demand label switching for spontaneous edge networks

Published:30 August 2004Publication History

ABSTRACT

We consider the problem of interconnecting hosts in spontaneous edge networks composed of various types of wired or wireless physical and link layer technologies. All or some hosts in a spontaneous network can be organized as a multi-hop ad hoc network, connected or not to the global Internet. We argue that this kind of networks requires a more sophisticated approach than standard IP forwarding: communication paths should be managed on a per flow basis, multiple paths need to be maintained to cope with link failures or changing topologies, and the interconnection architecture should provide information on destination reachability.We have designed and implemented Lilith, a prototype of an interconnection node for spontaneous edge networks. We handle network dynamics by establishing MPLS (Multi Protocol Label Switching) label switched paths (LSP) on demand with a reactive ad hoc routing protocol. Interconnection at layer 2.5 makes all the hosts to appear as one single IP subnet so that configuration protocols can use the subnet broadcast for all forms of discovery (addresses, names, services). Performance measurements of the Lilith implementation on Linux show good performance compared with standard IP forwarding and important performance gains when multiple paths are used.

References

  1. G. Chelius and E. Fleury. Ananas: An Ad hoc Network Architectural Scheme. In Proc. MWCN. IEEE, September 2002.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. T. H. Clausen and P. Jacquet. Optimized Link State Routing Protocol (OLSR). RFC 3626, 2003.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. S. Corson and J. Macker. Mobile Ad hoc Networking (MANET): Routing Protocol Performance Issues and Evaluation Considerations. RFC 2501, 1999.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. B. Ford. Unmanaged Internet Protocol: Taming the Edge Network Management Crisis. In Proc. HotNets-II, pages 476--483, Boston, 2003.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. C. Huitema et al. Unmanaged Networks IPv6 Transition Scenarios. Internet draft, October 2003.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. C. Huitema et al. Evaluation of IPv6 Transition Mechanisms for Unmanaged Networks. Internet draft, February 2004.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. H. Lundgren, E. Nordstrom, and C. Tschudin. Coping with Communication Gray Zones in IEEE 802.11b based Ad Hoc Networks. In Proc. 5th ACM International Workshop on Wireless Mobile Multimedia, 2002.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. IETF MANET Working Group, 2000. http://www.ietf.org/html.charters/-manet-charter.html.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. O. Marce and D. Galand. Architecture for Zerouter. Internet draft, January 2003.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. M. K. Marina and S. R. Das. On-demand Multipath Distance Vector Routing in Ad Hoc Networks. In Proc. IEEE ICNP, 2001.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. S. Nesargi and R. Prakash. MANETconf: Configuration of Hosts in a Mobile Ad Hoc Network. In Proc. INFOCOM'02, 2002.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. C. E. Perkins, editor. Ad Hoc Networking, chapter DSR: The Dynamic Source Routing Protocol for Multi-Hop Wireless Ad Hoc Networks, pages 139--172. Addison-Wesley, 2001.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. C. E. Perkins, E. M. Belding-Royer, and S. R. Das. Ad hoc On-Demand Distance Vector (AODV) Routing. RFC 3561, 2003.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Perkins, C. et al. IP address autoconfiguration for ad hoc networks. Internet draft, November 2001.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. R. Perlman. Rbridges: Transparent Routing. In Proc. Infocom 2004, Hong Kong, March 2004.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. E. Rosen, A. Viswanathan, and R. Callon. Multiprotocol Label Switching Architecture. RFC 3031, 2001.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. S. Toner and D. O'Mahony. Self-organising node address management in ad-hoc networks. In Proc. PWC, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 2775, 2003.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. C. Tschudin and R. Gold. Network Pointers. In Proc. HotNets-I, 2002.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. C. Tschudin, R. Gold, O. Rensfelt, and O. Wibling. LUNAR: a Lightweight Underlay Network Ad-hoc Routing Protocol and Implementation. In Proc. Next Generation Teletraffic and Wired/Wireless Advanced Networking (NEW2AN'04), 2004.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. V. Untz, M. Heusse, F. Rousseau, and A. Duda. Lilith: an Interconnection Architecture Based on Label Switching for Spontaneous Edge Networks. In Proc. Mobiquitous 2004, Boston, August 2004.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. On demand label switching for spontaneous edge networks

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        FDNA '04: Proceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM workshop on Future directions in network architecture
        August 2004
        326 pages
        ISBN:158113942X
        DOI:10.1145/1016707

        Copyright © 2004 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 30 August 2004

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • Article

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader