ABSTRACT
Often, researchers use data from past studies to inform the design of current products, However, whereas these "past studies" typically include prior usability tests and other formative research on interactive technology, they often do not include existing formative research in other media. The present literature review identifies some of the features that have been found to contribute to the educational effectiveness of magazines, television programs, and interactive media for children. Although each medium certainly poses its own unique issues, the review demonstrates that, in fact, many of the same features contribute to educational effectiveness across media.
- Anderson, D. R., Bryant, J., Wilder, A., Santomero, A., Williams, M. & Crawley, A. M. (2000). Researching Blue's Clues: Viewing behavior and impact. Media Psychology, 2, 179-194.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Bryant, J., Zillman, D., & Brown, D. (1983). Entertainment features in children's educational television: Effects on attention and information acquisition. In Bryant, J., & Anderson, D. R. (Eds.), Children's understanding of television: Research on attention and comprehension (pp. 221-240). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Cherow-O'Leary, R. (2001). Carrying Sesame Street into print: Sesmae Street Magazine, Sesame Street Parents, and Sesame Street books. In Fisch, S. M., & Truglio, R. T. (Eds.), "G" is for growing: Thirty years of research on Sesame Street (pp. 197-214). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- Collins, W. A. (1983). Interpretation and inference in children's television viewing. In Bryant, J., & Anderson, D. R. (Eds.), Children's understanding of television: Research on attention and comprehension. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Collins, W. A., Wellman, H., Keniston, A. H., & Westby, S. D. (1978). Age-related aspects of comprehension and inference from a televised dramatic narrative. Child Development, 49, 389-399.Google ScholarCross Ref
- CTW Program Research. (1999a). Make-a-Story parent-child interaction study. Unpublished research report. New York: Children's Television Workshop.Google Scholar
- CTW Program Research. (1999b). One Tree Hill comic study, Unpublished research report. New York: Children's Television Workshop.Google Scholar
- CTW Program Research School-Age Team. (1998). Magazine research: What we've learned. Unpublished research report, New York: Children's Television Workshop.Google Scholar
- Druin, A., & Solomon, C. (1996). Designing multimedia environments for children. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Eckhardt, B. B., Wood, M. R., & Jacobvitz, R. S. (1991). Verbal ability and prior knowledge: Contributions to adults' comprehension of television. Communication Research, 18, 636-649.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Fisch, S. M. (2000). A capacity model of children's comprehension of educational content on television. Media Psychology, 2, 63-91.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Fisch, S. M. (in press). Characteristics of effective materials for informal education: A cross-media comparison of television, magazines, and interactive media. In M. Rabinowitz, F. C. Blumberg, & E. Everson (Eds.), The impact of media and technology on instruction. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- Fisch, S. M., Cohen, D. I., McCann, S. K., & Hoffman, L. (1993). Square One TV research history and bibliography. New York: Children's Television Workshop.Google Scholar
- Fisch, S. M., & McCann, S. K. (1993). Making broadcast television participative: Eliciting mathematical behavior through Square One TV. Educational Technology Research and Development, 41 (3), 103-109.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Fisch, S. M., Wilder, G., Yotive, W. M., & McCann, S. K. (1994, July). How different is "different?": Diversity in the context of overall trends regarding Ghostwriter and Square One TV. In Wilson, B. J. (Chair), Reaching specific audiences through the mass media: Lessons from the Children's Television Workshop. Invited symposium presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association, Sydney, Australia.Google Scholar
- Hanna, L., Risden, K., Czerwinski, M., & Alexander, K. J. (1999). The role of usability research in designing children's computer products. In Druin, A. (Ed.), The design of children's technology (pp. 3-26). San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufman Publishers, Inc. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Huston, A. C., & Wright, J. C. (1983). Children's processing of television: The informative functions of formal features. In J. Bryant & D. R. Anderson (Eds.), Children's understanding of television: Research on attention and comprehension (pp. 35-68). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Kafai, Y. B. (1999). Children as designers, testers, and evaluators of educational software. In Druin, A. (Ed.), The design of children's technology (pp. 123-145). San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufman Publishers, Inc. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kirk, G., & Bernstein, L. (1975). March, 1975 Sesame Street Magazine research report. Unpublished research report. New York: Children's Television Workshop.Google Scholar
- Lesser, G. S. (1972). Assumptions behind the writing and production methods in Sesame Street. In Schramm, W. (Ed.), Quality in instructional television (pp. 108-164). Honolulu: University Press of Hawaii.Google Scholar
- Lesser, G. S. (1974). Children and television: Lessons from Sesame Street. New York: Vintage Books/Random House.Google Scholar
- Levin, S. R., & Anderson, D. R. (1976). The development of attention. Journal of Communication, 26, 2, 126-135.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Lieberman, D. (1999). The researcher's role in the design of children's media and technology. In Druin, A. (Ed.), The design of children's technology (pp. 73-97). San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufman Publishers, Inc. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Link, N, & Cherow-O'Leary, R. (1990). Research and development of print materials at the Children's Television Workshop. Educational Technology Research and Development, 38, 4, 34-44.Google ScholarCross Ref
- McGhee, P. E. (1980). Toward the integration of entertainment and educational functions of television: The role of humor. In Tannenbaum, P. (Ed.), The entertainment functions of television (pp. 183-208). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- National Institute of Mental Health. (1982). Television and behavior: Ten years of scientific progress and implications for the Eighties, vol. 1: Summary report. Rockville, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.Google Scholar
- Nielsen, J. (2000). Designing web usability. Indianapolis, IN: New Riders Publishing.Google Scholar
- Pace, A. J. (1980). The ability of young children to correct comprehension errors: An aspect of comprehension monitoring. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Boston, MA.Google Scholar
- Pace, A. J. (1981). Comprehension monitoring by elementary students: When does it occur? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Los Angeles, CA.Google Scholar
- Reiser, R. A., Tessmer, M. A., & Phelps, P. C. (1984). Adult-child interaction in children's learning from Sesame Street. Educational Communication and Technology Journal, 32, 217-223.Google Scholar
- Reiser, R. A., Williamson, N., & Suzuki, K. (1988). Using Sesame Street to facilitate children's recognition of letters and numbers. Educational Communication and Technology Journal, 36, 15-21.Google Scholar
- Revelle, G. L., Strommen, E. F., & Medoff, L. (2001). Interactive technologies research at the Children's Television Workshop. In Fisch. S. M., & Truglio, R. T. (Eds.), "G" is for growing: Thirty years of research on Sesame Street (pp. 215-230). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- Salomon, G. (1977). Effects of encouraging Israeli mothers to co-observe Sesame Street with their five-year-olds. Child Development, 48, 1146-1151.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Schauble, L. (1990). Formative evaluation in the design of educational software at the Children's Television Workshop. In Flagg, B. N. (Ed.), Formative evaluation for educational technology (pp. 51-66). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- Shneiderman, B. (1998). Designing the user interface: Strategies for effective human-computer interaction. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Strommen, E. F., & Revelle, G. L. (1990). Research in interactive technologies at the Children's Television Workshop. Educational Technology Research and Development, 38, 4, 65-80.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Valkenburg, P. M., & Janssen, S. C. (1999). What do children value in entertainment programs? A cross-cultural investigation. Journal of Communication, 49, 2, 3-21.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Williams, M. E., Hall, E., Cunningham, H., Albright, M., Schiro, K., & Fisch, S. (1997). Ghostwriter Research History and Bibliography. New York: Children's Television Workshop.Google Scholar
- Wilsdon, A. (1989). 3-2-1 Contact redesign test. Unpublished research report. New York: Children's Television Workshop.Google Scholar
- Wilson, K. S., & Talley, W. J. (1990). The "Palenque" project: Formative evaluation in the development and design of an optical disc prototype. In Flagg, B. N. (Ed.), Formative evaluation for educational technology. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- Zillman, D., Williams, B. R., Bryant, J., Boynton, K. R., & Wolf, M. A. (1980). Acquisition of information from educational television programs as a function of differently paced humorous inserts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 72, 170-180.Google ScholarCross Ref
Recommendations
Opportunities of Social Media in TV Broadcasting
NordiCHI '16: Proceedings of the 9th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer InteractionThe traditional television broadcasters' audience is getting older and the broadcasters have lost their younger audiences. One of the actions they have taken, is to increase the use of social media in their programmes and shows in order to address their ...
"I just want to see the news": interactivity in mobile environments
EuroITV '07: Proceedings of the 5th European Conference on Interactive TV and VideoMobile TV marketers are announcing mobile TV as a new interactive medium, however users seemingly "just want to see news" but cannot imagine using interactivity. This paper deals with the challenge of enabling and encouraging users to understand the ...
Learning experiences of mobile social media
In this paper, we describe how a mobile social video application (MoViE) was used to teach HCI concepts. The aims of the study were to study the success factors of mobile video blogging and future expectations of mobile video blogging in education. The ...
Comments