skip to main content
10.1145/1027802.1027833acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesuccsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

How long can we keep doing more with less?

Published:10 October 2004Publication History

ABSTRACT

As demands on information technology staff increase year after year, a few of us have been fortunate enough to experience much-needed expansion of our information technology staff and associated resources. Most of us in university and college information technology services, however, find ourselves forced to do more with a constant or decreasing budget.

My group currently supports twice as many computers as it did four years ago and offers a wider variety of services and better quality service, all with fewer staff. How are we managing to do this? What have been the keys to our success, and where are future opportunities and challenges? Can these productivity increases continue forever?

This paper and presentation detail ways in which a small staff of information technology professionals can improve and increase service with constant or decreasing resources, including: <ul><li>Establishment and enforcement of support policies</li><li>Automation or elimination of repetitive tasks</li><li>Better support through problem prevention</li><li>Merging of resources with other departments or programs</li><li>Trading work with your customers</li><li>Remote administration</li><li>Sharing ideas with and stealing ideas from colleagues around the world</li></ul>

I am optimistic. Although it always seems as if we have reached the limit of what we can support, a look back will make it clear that while we have always thought this, we have always found ways to improve and increase support. To continue along a path of increased productivity, however, it is imperative that we share information about best practices in information technology support.

References

  1. A classic example of sharing: workarounds for poorly designed Mac OS X applications, at least for public lab deployment: &lt;http://www.macos.utah.edu/Documentation/Crappyapps/crappyapps.html&gt;Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Labmgr: &lt;http://listserv.uark.edu/archives/labmgr.html&gt;Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Maclabmgr list: &lt;http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/maclabmanager&gt;Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Mac-Mgrs list: &lt;http://www.mac-mgrs.org/&gt;Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. ResNet-L: &lt;http://listserv.nd.edu/archives/resnet-l.html&gt;Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. SIGUCCS Conferences: &lt;http://www.acm.org/siguccs/&gt;Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. SIGUCCS-L: &lt;http://www.listserv.umd.edu/archives/siguccs.html&gt;Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. How long can we keep doing more with less?

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        SIGUCCS '04: Proceedings of the 32nd annual ACM SIGUCCS conference on User services
        October 2004
        400 pages
        ISBN:1581138695
        DOI:10.1145/1027802

        Copyright © 2004 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 10 October 2004

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • Article

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate123of170submissions,72%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader