skip to main content
10.1145/1031607.1031626acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescscwConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Evaluating computer-supported cooperative work: models and frameworks

Published: 06 November 2004 Publication History

Abstract

Evaluating distributed CSCW applications is a difficult endeavor. Frameworks and methodologies for structuring this type of evaluation have become a central concern for CSCW researchers. In this paper we describe the problems involved in evaluating remote collaborations, and we review some of the more prominent conceptual frameworks of group interaction that have driven CSCW evaluation in the past. A multifaceted evaluation framework is presented that approaches the problem from the relationships underlying joint awareness, communication, collaboration, coordination, and work coupling. Finally, recommendations for carrying out multifaceted evaluations of remote interaction are provided.

References

[1]
Arrow, H., McGrath, J. E., and Berdahl, J. L. (2000). Small Groups as Complex Systems: Formation, Coordination, Development, and Adaptation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
[2]
Borghoff, U. M., and Schlichter, J. H. (2000). Computer-Supported Cooperative Work: Introduction to Distributed Applications: Springer.
[3]
Brooks, F. P. (1995). The Mythical Man-Mouth. Reading, Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley.
[4]
Carroll, J. M., Neale, D. C., Isenhour, P. L., Rosson, M. B., and McCrickard, D. S. (2003). Notification and awareness: synchronizing task-oriented collaborative activity. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 58, 605--632.
[5]
Carroll, J. M., Chin, G., Rosson, M. B., & Neale, D. C. (2000). The development of cooperation: Five years of participatory design in the virtual school. In Proceedings on Designing Interactive Systems: Processes, Practices, Methods, and Techniques (pp. 239--251), New York: Association for Computing Machinery.
[6]
Clark, H. H. (1996). Using Language. New York: Cambridge University Press.
[7]
Convertino, G., Neale, D. C., Hobby, L., Carroll, J. M., and Rosson, M. B. (2004). A laboratory method for studying activity awareness. In NordiCHI 2004 (to appear). Tampere, Finland: Association of Computing Machinery.
[8]
Damianos, L., Hirschman, L., Kozierok, R., Kurtz, J., Greenberg, A., Walls, K., Laskowski, S., and Scholtz, J. (1999). Evaluation for collaborative systems. ACM Computing Surveys, 31(2).
[9]
Dourish, P., and Bellotti, V. (1992). Awareness and coordination in shared workspaces. In Proceedings of the ACM CSCW '92 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (pp. 107--113). New York: Association for Computing Machinery.
[10]
Ganoe, C. H., Somervell, J. P., Neale, D. C., Isenhour, P. L., Carroll, J. M., Rosson, M. B., and McCrickard, D. S. (2003). Classroom BRIDGE: Using collaborative public and desktop timelines to support activity awareness. In Proceedings of the ACM '03 Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST) (pp. 21--30). New York: Association for Computing Machinery.
[11]
Greene, J. C., Caracelli, V. J., and Graham, W. F. (1989). Toward a conceptual framework for mixed-method evaluation designs. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 11, 255--274.
[12]
Grudin, J. (1988). Why groupware applications fail: Problems in design and evaluation. Office: Technology and People, 4(3), 245--264.
[13]
Grudin, J. (2002). Group dynamics and ubiquitous computing. Communications of the ACM, 45(12), 74--78.
[14]
Hare, A. P. (1992). Groups, teams, and social interaction: Theories and applications. New York: Praeger.
[15]
Hartswood, M., and Procter, R. (2000). Design guidelines for dealing with breakdowns and repairs in collaborative work settings. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 53, 91--120.
[16]
Helms, J., Neale, D. C., and Carroll, J. M. (2000). Data logging: Higher-level capturing and multi-level abstracting of user activities. In Proceedings of the 40th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society (pp. 303--306). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
[17]
Hendrick, H. W., and Kleiner, B. M. (2000). Macroergonomics: An introduction to work system design. (Vol. 2). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
[18]
Humphries, W., Neale, D. C., McCrickard, D. S., and Carroll, J. M. (2004). Laboratory Simulation Methods for Studying Complex Collaborative Tasks. In Proceedings of the 48th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society. Human Factors and Ergonomics Society (to appear). Santa Monica, CA.
[19]
Isenhour, P. L., Carroll, J. M., Neale, D. C., Rosson, M. B., and Dunlap, D. R. (2000). The virtual school: An integrated collaborative environment for the classroom. Educational Technology and Society, Special Issue on "On-Line Collaborative Learning Environments", 3(3), http://ifets.ieee.org/periodical/.
[20]
Klein, G. (2001). Features of team coordination. In M. McNeese, E. Salas, and M. Endsley (Eds.), New Trends in Cooperative Activities: Understanding System Dynamics in Complex Environments (pp. 68--95). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
[21]
Malone, T. W., and Crowston, K. (1994). The interdisciplinary study of coordination. ACM Computing Surveys, 26(1), 87--119.
[22]
McGrath, J. E. (1984). Groups: Interaction and performance. Englewoods Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
[23]
McGrath, J. E. (1990). Time matters in groups. In J. Galegher, R. E. Kraut, and C. Egido (Eds.), Intellectural Teamwork: Social and Technological Foundations of Cooperative Work (pp. 23--61). Hillsdale, N. J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.
[24]
McGrath, J. E. (1994). Methodology matters: Doing research in the behavioral and social sciences. In R. M. Baecker, J. Grudin, W. A. S. Buxton, and S. Greenberg (Eds.), Readings in human-computer interaction: Toward the year 2000 (pp. 152--169). San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
[25]
Miles, M. B., and Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
[26]
Nardi, B. A. E. (Ed.). (1996). Context and consciousness: Activity theory and human-computer interaction. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
[27]
Neale, D. C., and Carroll, J. M. (1999). Multi-faceted evaluation for complex, distributed activities. In Proceedings of CSCL'99 Computer Supported Cooperative Learning (pp. 425--433). Mahwah, New Jersy: Lawrence Erlbaum.
[28]
Neale, D. C., Dunlap, D. R., Isenhour, P., and Carroll, J. M. (2000). Collaborative critical incident development. In Proceedings of the 44th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society (pp. 598--601). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
[29]
Olson, G. M., and Olson, J. S. (1997). Research on computer supported cooperative work. In M. Helander, T. K. Landauer, and P. Prablu (Eds.), Handbook of Human-Computer Interaction (pp. 1433--1456). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier Science.
[30]
Olson, G. M., and Olson, J. S. (2000). Distance matters. Human-Computer Interaction, 15, 139--178.
[31]
Olson, G. M., and Olson, J. S. (2001). Technology support for collaborative workgroups. In G. M. Olson, T. W. Malone, and J. B. Smith (Eds.), Coordination Theory and Collaboration Technology (pp. 559--584). Mahwah, N. J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.
[32]
Pedhazur, E. J. (1991). Measurement, design, and analysis: An integrated approach. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.
[33]
Pinelle, D., and Gutwin, C. (2000). A review of groupware evaluations. In Proceedings of the 9th IEEE WETICE (pp. 86--91).
[34]
Pinelle, D., Gutwin, C., and Greenberg, A. (2003). Task analysis for groupware usability evaluation: Modeling shared-workspace tasks with the mechanics of collaboration. Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 10(4), 281--311.
[35]
Pinsonneault, A., and Kraemer, K. L. (1989). The impact of technological support on groups: An assessment of the empirical research. Decision Support Systems, 5(2), 197--211.
[36]
Plowman, L., Rogers, Y., and Ramage, M. (1995). What are workplace studies for?. In Proceedings of ECSCW '95 European Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work (pp. 309--324). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
[37]
Ross, S., Ramage, M., and Rogers, Y. (1995). PETRA: Participatory evaluation through redesign and analysis. Interacting with Computers, 7(4), 335--360.
[38]
Ruhleder, K., and Jordan, B. (1998). Video-based interaction analysis (VBIA) in distributed settings: A tool for analyzing multiple-site, technology-supported interactions. In Proceeding of the Participatory Design Conference (pp. 195--196). Seattle, WA.
[39]
Salvador, T., Scholtz, J., and Larson, J. (1996). The denver model for groupware design. SIGCHI Bulletin, 28(1), 52--58.
[40]
Sproull, L., and Kiesler, S. (1991). Connections: New ways of working in the networked organization. London: MIT Press.
[41]
Stanney, K. M., and Maxey, J. (1997). Socially centered design. In G. Salvendy (Ed.), Handbook of Human Factors and Ergonomics (2nd Edition) (pp. 637--656). New York: Wiley.
[42]
Suchman, L. (1987). Plans and situated actions. New York: Cambridge University Press.
[43]
Tashakkori, A., and Teddlie, C. (1998). Mixed methodology: Combining qualitative and quantitative approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
[44]
Thomas, P. J. (Ed.). (1996). CSCW Requirements and Evaluation. London: Springer.
[45]
Twidale, M., Randall, D., and Bentley, R. (1994). Situated evaluation for cooperative systems. In Proceedings of the ACM CSCW '94 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (pp. 441--452). New York: Association for Computing Machinery.
[46]
Vicente, K. J. (1997). Heeding the legacy of Meister, Brunswik, & Gibson: Toward a broader view of human factors research. Human Factors, 39(2), 323--328.
[47]
Watts, L., and Monk, A. (1996). Inter-personal awareness and synchronization: Assessing the value of communication technologies. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 44, 849--873.
[48]
Whittaker, S., and Schwarz, H. (1999). Meetings of the board: The impact of scheduling medium on long term group coordination in software development. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 8, 175--205.
[49]
Woods, D. D. (2003). Discovering how distributed cognitive systems work. In E. Hollnagel (Ed.), Handbook of cognitive task design (pp. 37--53). Mahwah, N.J.: Lawarence Erlbaum.
[50]
Xiao, Y., and Vicente, K. J. (2000). A framework for epistemological analysis in empirical (laboratory and field) studies. Human Factors, 42(1), 87--101.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)The impact of video consultation on interprofessional collaboration and professional roles: a simulation-based study in prehospital stroke chain of careJournal of Interprofessional Care10.1080/13561820.2024.234407538:4(664-674)Online publication date: 8-May-2024
  • (2024)Using Word Games as Facilitator to Awareness Raising Communication in Public SpacesCollaboration Technologies and Social Computing10.1007/978-3-031-67998-8_15(212-219)Online publication date: 20-Aug-2024
  • (2023)Designing for Hybrid Intelligence: A Taxonomy and Survey of Crowd-Machine InteractionApplied Sciences10.3390/app1304219813:4(2198)Online publication date: 8-Feb-2023
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
CSCW '04: Proceedings of the 2004 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work
November 2004
644 pages
ISBN:1581138105
DOI:10.1145/1031607
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 06 November 2004

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. CSCW evaluation
  2. awareness
  3. common ground
  4. models

Qualifiers

  • Article

Conference

CSCW04
CSCW04: Computer Supported Cooperative Work
November 6 - 10, 2004
Illinois, Chicago, USA

Acceptance Rates

CSCW '04 Paper Acceptance Rate 53 of 176 submissions, 30%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 2,235 of 8,521 submissions, 26%

Upcoming Conference

CSCW '25

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)104
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)4
Reflects downloads up to 01 Mar 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)The impact of video consultation on interprofessional collaboration and professional roles: a simulation-based study in prehospital stroke chain of careJournal of Interprofessional Care10.1080/13561820.2024.234407538:4(664-674)Online publication date: 8-May-2024
  • (2024)Using Word Games as Facilitator to Awareness Raising Communication in Public SpacesCollaboration Technologies and Social Computing10.1007/978-3-031-67998-8_15(212-219)Online publication date: 20-Aug-2024
  • (2023)Designing for Hybrid Intelligence: A Taxonomy and Survey of Crowd-Machine InteractionApplied Sciences10.3390/app1304219813:4(2198)Online publication date: 8-Feb-2023
  • (2023)Designing for Collaborative Non-Driving Related Activities in Future Cars: Fairness and Team PerformanceProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36042497:MHCI(1-28)Online publication date: 13-Sep-2023
  • (2023)COMPO*SED: Composite Parallel Coordinates for Co-Dependent Multi-Attribute ChoicesIEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics10.1109/TVCG.2022.318089929:10(4047-4061)Online publication date: 1-Oct-2023
  • (2023)An effective knowledge graph entity alignment model based on multiple informationNeural Networks10.1016/j.neunet.2023.02.029162:C(83-98)Online publication date: 1-May-2023
  • (2023)Collaborative TV Control: Towards Co-experience and Social ConnectednessHuman-Computer Interaction – INTERACT 202310.1007/978-3-031-42286-7_20(369-392)Online publication date: 28-Aug-2023
  • (2023)A Survey of Computer-Supported Remote Collaboration on Physical ObjectsHuman-Computer Interaction – INTERACT 202310.1007/978-3-031-42286-7_19(346-368)Online publication date: 25-Aug-2023
  • (2023)Requirements Analysis to Support Equal Participation in Hybrid Collaboration Settings in Higher EducationLearning and Collaboration Technologies10.1007/978-3-031-34550-0_30(411-430)Online publication date: 9-Jun-2023
  • (2022)Technology Trends and Cyber Security in BangladeshInternational Journal of Technology Diffusion10.4018/IJTD.30438113:1(1-17)Online publication date: 8-Jul-2022
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media