ABSTRACT
Single Display Groupware (SDG) lets multiple co-located people, each with their own input device, interact simultaneously over a single communal display. While SDG is beneficial, there is risk of <i>interference</i>: when two people are interacting in close proximity, one person can raise an interface component (such as a menu, dialog box, or movable palette) over another person's working area, thus obscuring and hindering the other's actions. Consequently, researchers have developed special purpose interaction components to mitigate interference techniques. Yet is interference common in practice? If not, then SDG versions of conventional interface components could prove more suitable. We hypothesize that collaborators spatially separate their activities to the extent that they partition their workspace into distinct areas when working on particular tasks, thus reducing the potential for interference. We tested this hypothesis by observing co-located people performing a set of collaborative drawing exercises in an SDG workspace, where we paid particular attention to the locations of their simultaneous interactions. We saw that spatial separation and partitioning occurred consistently and naturally across all participants, rarely requiring any verbal negotiation. Particular divisions of the space varied, influenced by seating position and task semantics. These results suggest that people naturally avoid interfering with one another by spatially separating their actions. This has design implications for SDG interaction techniques, especially in how conventional widgets can be adapted to an SDG setting.
- Altman, I. The Environment and Social Behavior. Monterey, California: Brooks/Cole Publishing Company, 1975.Google Scholar
- Bederson, B. B., Hollan, J. D., Druin, A., Stewart, J., Rogers, D., & Proft, D. Local Tools: An Alternative. Proc. ACM UIST '96, 169--170, 1996. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Bier, E., Stone, M., Pier, K., Buxton, W. and DeRose, T. Toolglass and Magic Lenses: The See-Through Interface. Proc. ACM SIGGRAPH '93, 73--80, 1993. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Bly, S. A use of drawing surfaces in different collaborative settings. Proc. ACM CSCW'99, 250--256, 1988. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Dietz, P. and Leigh, D. DiamondTouch: A multi-user touch technology. Proc ACM UIST'01, 219--266, 2001. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Greenberg, S., Boyle, M. and LaBerge, J. PDAs and Shared Public Displays: Making Personal Information Public, and Public Information Personal. Personal Technologies, 3(1), 54--64, Elsevier, March 1999.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Guibretière, F., Winograd, T. Flow Menu: Combining Command, Text, and Data Entry. Proc. ACM UIST '00, 213--216, 2000. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Gutwin, C., Dyck, J., and Fedak, C. The Effects of Dynamic Transparency on Targeting Performance. Proc. GI '03, 105--112, 2003.Google Scholar
- Gutwin, C. and Greenberg, S. Design for Individuals, Design for Groups: Tradeoffs between power and workspace awareness. Proc. CSCW'98, 207--216, 1998. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kruger, R., Carpendale, M.S.T., Scott, S.D., & Greenberg, S. How People Use Orientation on Tables: Comprehension, Coordination and Communication. In Proc. GROUP'03, pp. 369--378, 2003. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Myers, B., Stiel, H. and Gargiulo, R. Collaboration Using Multiple PDAs Connected to a PC. Proc. CSCW'98, 285--294, 1998. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Nardi, B. A Small Matter of Programming: Perspectives on End User Computing. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1993. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Pinelle, D., Gutwin, C. and Greenberg, S. Task Analysis for Groupware Usability Evaluation: Modeling Shared-Workspace Tasks with the Mechanics of Collaboration. ACM TOCHI 10(4), 281--311, 2003. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Rekimoto, J. A multiple device approach for supporting whiteboard-based interactions. Proc. CHI '98, 18--23, 1998. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Scott, S.D. Territory-Based Interaction Techniques for Tabletop Collaboration. Conference Companion of UIST'03, 17--20, 2003.Google Scholar
- Shen, C., Everitt, K.M., & Ryall, K. UbiTable: Impromptu Face-to-Face Collaboration on Horizontal Interactive Surfaces. Proc. of UbiComp'03, 281--288, 2003.Google Scholar
- Shoemaker, G., Inkpen, K. Single Display Privacyware: Augmenting Public Displays with Private Information. Proc. ACM CHI '01, 286--293, 2001. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Smart Technologies, Inc. DViT Digital Vision Touch Technology: White Paper, www.smarttech.com/dvit/DViT_white_paper.pdf, (2003).Google Scholar
- Stewart, J., Bederson, B. and Druin, A. Single display groupware: A model for co-present collaboration, Proc ACM CHI'99, 286--293, 1999. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Tang, J.C. Findings from observational studies of collaborative work. Int. J. Man-Machine Studies, 34, 143--160, 1991. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Tang, J.C. Listing Drawing and Gesturing in Design: A Study of the Use of Shared Workspaces by Design Teams. PhD Thesis, Stanford University, 1989.Google Scholar
- Taylor, R.B. Human Territorial Functioning. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1988.Google Scholar
- Tse, E., Greenberg, S. Rapidly Prototyping Single Display Groupware through the SDGToolkit. Proc 5th AUIC Australasian User Interface Conference, 101--110, 2003. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Zanella, A. and Greenberg, S. Reducing Interference in Single Display Groupware through Transparency. Proc. ECSCW '01, 339--358, 2001. Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- Avoiding interference: how people use spatial separation and partitioning in SDG workspaces
Recommendations
Shared Interaction on a Wall-Sized Display in a Data Manipulation Task
CHI '16: Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsWall-sized displays support small groups of users working together on large amounts of data. Observational studies of such settings have shown that users adopt a range of collaboration styles, from loosely to closely coupled. Shared interaction ...
The proximity factor: impact of distance on co-located collaboration
GROUP '05: Proceedings of the 2005 ACM International Conference on Supporting Group WorkGroups collaborating around a large wall display can do so in a variety of arrangements, positioning themselves at different distances from the display and from each other. We examined the impact of proximity on the effectiveness and enjoyment of co-...
Supporting private information on public displays
CHI EA '00: CHI '00 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing SystemsThe research area of Single Display Groupware (SDG) looks at how to best support multiple users collaborating around a single computer [4]. One outstanding issue in SDG research concerns how to display private information on shared displays. This paper ...
Comments