skip to main content
article

Information processing model of information technology adaptation: an intra-organizational diffusion perspective

Published:07 February 2005Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Appropriate information technology (IT) diffusion facilitates the achievement of expected return on IT investments. The purpose of this study is to advance IT diffusion research by employing information processing theory as a lens with which to examine the adaptation (design, development, and installation) process. This is in contrast to much of the IT diffusion research, which focuses on factors affecting usage of an IT by members of an organization. We link information processing theory to the innovation diffusion literature by considering attributes of the IT and those of the adopting organization in order to determine what information processing media characteristics will lead to effective adaptation. An IT adaptation case study is also employed to build on and extend elements of information processing and innovation diffusion theories. These exercises result in an information processing model of IT adaptation.The model suggests that appropriately matching information processing volume and richness to uncertainty and equivocality reduction requirements of an IT innovation contributes to successful IT adaptation. Propositions are offered that provide guidance for achieving this match by outlining relationships among IT and organization attributes, as well as indicating how those attributes determine levels of uncertainty and equivocality. Further, the propositions suggest how organizations can appropriately manage uncertainty and equivocality during IT adaptation.

References

  1. Abrahamson, E. (1991). "Managerial fads and fashions: The diffusion and rejection of innovations," Academy of Management Review, Vol. 16, No. 3, pp. 586--612.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Agarwal, R and Prasad, J. (1997). "A conceptual and operational definition of personal innovativeness in the domain of information technology," Information Systems Research, Vol. 9, No. 2, pp. 204--215. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Agarwal, R and Prasad, J. (1997). "The role of innovation characteristics and perceived voluntariness in the acceptance of information technologies," Decision Sciences, Vol. 28, No. 3, pp. 557--582.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Allen, T.J., and Cohen, S. (1969). "Information flow in R&D labs," Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 14, No. 1, pp. 12--19.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Applegate, L. M; Cash, J. I. Jr.; Mills, D. (1988). "Information technology and tomorrow's manager", Harvard Business Review, Nov.-Dec. pp. 128--136.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Benbasat, I; Goldstein, D; and Mead, M. (1987). "The case research strategy in studies of information systems," MIS Quarterly, Vol. 11, No. 3, pp. 369--386. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Beyer, J.M., & Trice, H.M. (1978). Implementing Change, New York: Free Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Brancheau, J.C. and Wetherbe, J.C. (1990). "The adoption of spreadsheet software: Testing innovation diffusion theory in the context of end--user computing," Information Systems Research, Vol. 1, No. 2, pp. 115--143.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Carlson, J. and Zmud, R. (1999). "Channel expansion theory and the experiential nature of media richness perceptions," Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 42, No. 2, pp. 153--170.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Chan, Y. (2002). "Why haven't we mastered alignment? The importance of the informal organizational structure," MIS Quarterly Executive, Vol. 1, No. 2, pp. 97--112.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Chan, Y.; Huff, S.; Barclay, D.; and Copeland, D. (1997). "Business strategic orientation, information systems strategic orientation, and strategic alignment," Information Systems Research. Vol. 8, No. 2, pp. 125--150.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Child, John (1987). "Managerial strategies, new technology, and the labor process", in Pennings and Buitendam, New Technology as Organizational Innovation: The Development and Diffusion of Microelectronics, Ballinger Publishing Company, pp. 141--177.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Child, J.; Ganter, H.; and Kieser, A. (1987). "Technological innovation and organizational conservatism," in Pennings and Buitendam New Technology as Organizational Innovation: The Development and Diffusion of Microelectronics, Ballinger Publishing Company, pp. 87--115.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Cooper, R.B. (2000). "Information technology development creativity: A case study of attempted radical change," MIS Quarterly, Vol. 24, No. 2, pp. 245--276. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Cooper, R. B. (1994). "The inertial impact of culture on IT implementation," Information & Management, Vol. 27, No. 1, pp. 17--31. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Cooper, R.B., and Zmud, R. (1990). "Information technology implementation research: A technological diffusion approach," Management Science, Vol. 36, No. 2, pp. 123--139. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Daft, R.; Lengel, R.; and Trevino L. (1987). "Message equivocality, media selection, and manager performance: Implications for information systems," MIS Quarterly, Vol. 11, No. 3, pp. 355--366. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Daft, R.L. and Weick, K.E. (1984). "Toward a model of organizations as interpretive systems," Academy of Management Review, Vol. 9, No. 2, pp. 284--295.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Daft, R.L., and Lengel, R.H. (1986). "Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design," Management Science, Vol. 32, No. 5, pp. 554--571. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Daft, R.L., and Macintosh, N.B. (1981). "A tentative exploration of the amount and equivocality of information processing in organizational work units," Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 26, No. 2, pp. 207--224.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Damanpour, F. (1991). "Organizational innovation: A meta analysis of effects of determinants and moderators," Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 34, No. 3, pp. 555--590.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Dennis, A. R. and Kinney, S. T. (1998). "Testing media richness theory in the new media: The effects of cues, feedback, and task equivocality," Information Systems Research, Vol. 9, No. 3, pp. 256--274. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Dewar, R.D., and Dutton, J.E. (1986). "The adoption of radical and incremental innovations: An empirical analysis," Management Science, Vol. 32, No. 11, pp. 1422--1433. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Dewett, T. (2001). "The role of information technology in the organization: a review, model, and assessment," Journal of Management, Vol. 27, No. 3, pp. 313--346.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Dougherty, D., and Hardy, C. (1996). "Sustained product innovation in large mature organizations: Overcoming innovation to organization problems," Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 39, No. 5, pp. 1120--1153.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Drazin, R. and Shoonhoven, C. (1996). "Community, population, and organization effects on innovation: A multilevel perspective," Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 39, No. 5, pp. 1065--1083.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Eisenhardt, K.M. (1989). "Building theories from case study research," Academy of Management Review, Vol. 14, No. 4, pp. 532--550.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. El-Shinnawy, M. and Markus, M. L. (1998). "Acceptance of communication media in organizations: richness or features?" IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, Vol. 41, No. 4, pp. 242--253.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Fulk, J. and Boyd, B. (1991). "Emerging theories of communication in organizations," Journal of Management, Vol. 17, No. 2, pp. 407--446.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Galbraith, J. (1973). Designing Complex Organizations, Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Galbraith, J. (1977). Organization Design, Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Galbraith, J. (1994). Competing With Flexible Lateral Organizations (2nd ed.). Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley Publishing.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Gales. L.; Porter, P.; and Mansour-Cole, D. (1992). "Innovation project technology, information processing and performance: A test of the Daft and Lengel conceptualization," Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, Vol. 9, No. 1--2, pp. 303--338.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. Gersick, C.J.G. (1988). "Time and transition in work teams: Toward a new model of group development," Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 31, No. 1, pp. 9--41.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Glaser, B. and Strauss, A. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research, Chicago: Aldine.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Gruber, W.; Poensgen, O.; and Prakke, F. (1974). "Research on the interface factor in the development of new technology," R&D Management, Vol. 4, No. 2, pp. 157--163.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. Hargadon, A. and Douglas, Y. (2001). "When innovations meet institutions: Edison and the design of the electric light," Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 46, No. 3. pp. 476--501.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  38. Harris, S.G. and Sutton, R.I. (1986). "Functions of parting ceremonies in dying organizations," Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp. 5--30.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Hedberg, B. and Jönsson, S. (1978). "Designing semiconfusing information systems", Accounting, Organizations, and Society, Vol. 3, No. 1, pp. 47--74.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  40. Kahai, S.S. and Cooper, R.B. (2003). "Exploring the core concepts of media richness theory: The impact of cue multiplicity and feedback immediacy on decision quality," Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol. 20, No. 1, pp 263--299. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  41. Kanter, R.M. (1983). The change masters: Innovation for productivity in the American corporation, New York: Simon and Schuster.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Kimberly, J.R. (1987). "Organizational and contextual Influences on the diffusion of technological innovation," in J.M. Pennings & A. Buitendam (Eds.), New Technology As Organizational Innovation: Cambridge: Ballinger Publishing Company, pp. 237--259.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. Kirk, J. and Miller, M.L. (1986). Reliability and Validity in Qualitative Research, Sage Publications, Beverly Hills, California.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. Klein, H. K. and Myers, M. D. (1999). "A set of principles for conducting and evaluating interpretive field studies in information systems," MIS Quarterly, Vol. 23, No. 1, pp. 67--93. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  45. Klein, K.J., and Sorra, J.S. (1996). "The challenge of innovation implementation," Academy of Management Review, Vol. 21, No. 4, pp. 1055--1080.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  46. Laudon, K.C. and Laudon, J.P. (1998). Management Information Systems: New Approaches to Organization and Technology, New Jersey: Prentice Hall, Inc. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  47. Lawrence, P.R., and Lorsch, J.W. (1967). Organization and Environment. Boston: Graduate School of Business Administration, Harvard University.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  48. Leonard-Barton, D. (1988). "Implementation characteristics of organizational innovations," Communication Research, Vol. 15, No. 5, pp. 603--631.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  49. Leonard-Barton, D., and Kraus, W.A. (1985). "Implementing new technology," Harvard Business Review, Nov.-Dec., pp. 102--110.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  50. Lind, M.R., and Zmud, R.W. (1995). "Improving interorganizational effectiveness through voice mail facilitation of peer-to-peer relationships," Organization Science, Vol. 6, No. ?, pp. 445--461.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  51. Lyles, M.A. and Mitroff, I.I. (1980). "Organization problem formulation: An empirical study," Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 25, No. 1, pp. 102--119.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  52. March, J.G. and Shapira, Z. (1987). "Managerial perspectives on risk and risk taking," Management Science, Vol. 33, No. ?, pp. 1404--1418. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  53. Mitchell, V. and Zmud, R. (1999). "The effects of coupling IT and work process strategies in redesign projects," Organization Science, Vol. 10, No. 4, pp. 424--438. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  54. Mohr, L. (1982). Explaining Organizational Behavior, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  55. Moore, G.C. and Benbasat, I. (1991). "Development of an instrument to measure the perceptions of adopting an information technology innovation," Information Systems Research, Vol. 2, No. 3, pp. 192--220.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  56. Nault, B.; Wolfe, R.; and Dexter, A. (1997). "Support strategies to foster adoption of interorganizational innovations," IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, Vol. 44, No. 4, pp 378--389.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  57. Nayyar, P.R. and Kazanjian, R.K. (1993). "Organizing to attain potential benefits from information asymmetries and economies of scope in related diversified firms," Academy of Management Review, Vol. 18, No. 4, pp. 735--759.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  58. Niedumolu, S. R.; Goodman, S. E.; Vogel D. R.; and Danowitz, A. K. (1996). "Information technology for local administration support: The governorates project in Egypt," MIS Quarterly, Vol. 20, No. 2, pp. 197--221. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  59. Nilakanta, S. and Scamell, R. (1991). "NOTES: The effects of information sources and communication channels on the diffusion of an innovation," Management Science, Vol. 37, No. 11, pp. 1503--1506. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  60. Nilakanta, S. and Scamell, R. (1990). "The effect of information sources and communication channels on the diffusion of innovation in a data base development environment," Management Science, Vol. 36, No. 1, pp. 24--40. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  61. Orlikowski, W. J. (2000). "Using technology and constituting structures: A practice lens for studying technology in organizations," Organization Science, Vol. 11, No. 4, pp. 404--428. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  62. Orlikowski, W. J. (1991). "Integrated information environment or matrix of control? The contradictory implications of information technology," Accounting, Management and Information Technology, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 9--42.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  63. Orlikowski, W.J. and Baroudi, J.J. (1991). "Studying information technology in organizations: Research approaches and assumptions," Information Systems Research, Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 1--28.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  64. Perrow, C. (1967). "A framework for the comparative analysis of organizations," American Sociological Review, Vol. 32, No. 2, pp. 194--208.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  65. Repenning, N. (2002). "A simulation-based approach to understanding the dynamics of innovation implementation," Organization Science, Vol. 13, No. 2, pp. 109--127. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  66. Rockart, J.F.; Earl, M.J.; and Ross, J.W. (1996). "Eight imperatives for the new IT organization," Sloan Management Review, Vol. 38, No. 1, pp. 43--52.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  67. Rogers, E.M. (1995). Diffusion of Innovations, (4th ed.). New York: The Free Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  68. Schon, Donald A. (1967). Technology and Change: The New Heraclitus, Delta Publishing Company, New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  69. Schrader, S; Riggs, W.M.; and Smith, R.P. (1993). "Choice over uncertainty and ambiguity in technical problem solving," Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, Vol. 10, No. 1--2, pp. 73--99.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  70. Shrivastava, P. and Mitroff, I.I. (1984). "Enhancing organizational research utilization: The role of decision maker's assumptions," Academy of Management Review, Vol. 9, No. 1, pp. 18--26.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  71. Souder, W. E. (1987). Managing New Product Innovations, Lexington Books, Lexington, Mass.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  72. Souder, W.E., and Moenaert, R.K. (1992). "Integrating marketing and R & D project personnel within innovation projects: An information uncertainty model," Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 29, No. 4, pp. 485--512.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  73. Suh, K. S. (1999). "Impact of communication medium on task performance and satisfaction: An Examination of Media Richness Theory," Information & Management, Vol. 35, No. 5, pp. 295--312. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  74. Swanson, E.B.; Fuller, M.K.; Nidumolu, S.; Ramiller, N.; and Ward, S.G. (1991). "NOTES: Illusive Effects on the diffusion of an innovation: A comment," Management Science, Vol. 37, No. 11, pp. 1500--1502. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  75. Thomas, J. and Trevino, L. (1993). "Information processing in strategic alliance building: A multiple-case approach," Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 30, No. 5, pp. 779--814.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  76. Thompson, J. D. (1967). Organizations in Action. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  77. Tornatzky, L.G. and Klein, K.J. (1982). "Innovation characteristics and innovation adoption-implementation: A meta-analysis of findings," IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp. 28--45.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  78. Tornatzky, L.G., and Fleischer, M. (1990). The Processes of Technological Innovation. Lexington, Mass.: Lexington Books.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  79. Trevino L.; Lengel, R.; Bodensteiner, W.; Gerloff, E.; and Muir, N. (1990). "The richness imperative and cognitive style: The role of individual differences in media choice behavior," Management Communication Quarterly, Vol. 4, No. 2, pp. 176--197.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  80. Trevino. L.; Lengel, R.H.; and Daft, R.L. (1987). "Media symbolism, media richness, and media choice in organizations," Communication Research, Vol. 15, No. 5, pp. 553--574.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  81. Tushman, M.L. (1979) "Managing communication networks in R&D laboratories," Sloan Management Review, Vol. 20, No. 2, pp. 37--49.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  82. Van de Ven, A.H. (1986). "Central problems in the management of innovation," Management Science, Vol. 32, No. 5, pp. 590--607. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  83. Van de Ven, A. and Rogers, E. (1988). "Innovations and organizations: Critical perspectives," Communication Research, Vol. 15, No. 5, pp. 632--651.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  84. Webster, Jane and Trevino, Linda Klebe (1995). "Rational and social theories as complementary explanations of communication media choices: Two policy-capturing studies," Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 38, No. 6, pp. 1544--1572.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  85. Wolfe, R.A. (1994). "Organizational innovation: Review, critique and suggested research directions," Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 31, No. 3, pp. 405--431.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  86. Wolfe, R.A. (1995). "Human resource management innovations: Determinants of their adoption and implementation," Human Resource Management Journal, Vol. 34, No. 2, pp. 313--327.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  87. Woodman, R. W.; Sawyer, J. E.; and Griffin, R. W. (1993). "Toward a theory of organizational creativity," The Academy of Management Review, Vol. 18, No. 2, pp. 293--321.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  88. Yin, R.K. (1994). Case Study Research: Design and Methods, Second Edition, Sage, Newbury Park.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  89. Zaltman, G.; Duncan, R.; and Holbek, J. (1973). Innovations and Organizations. New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  90. Zmud, Robert W. (1983). "The effectiveness of external information channels in facilitating innovation within software development groups," MIS Quarterly, Vol. 7, No. 2, pp. 43----58.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Information processing model of information technology adaptation: an intra-organizational diffusion perspective

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in

      Full Access

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader