skip to main content
editorial
Free Access

What makes users unhappy: share-point team services web server security

Published:01 January 2005Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Computer & Internet Security is very important but sometimes it is so confusing and frustrating that it makes users very unhappy to a point where the system is so secure that it cannot be used by its most legitimate users, like system administrators

References

  1. 1 Rushinek, A. and Rushinek, S. "Distribution Processing: Implications and Applications for Business," JOURNAL OF SYSTEMS MANAGEMENT, Vol. 35, No. 7, 21-27, July 1984.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. 2 Rushinek, A. and Rushinek, S. "The Effects of Word Processing Software on User Satisfaction: An Empirical Study of Micro, Mini and Mainframe Computers," OFFICE SYSTEMS RESEARCH JOURNAL, Vol. 3, No. 1, lead article 1-16, Fall 1984.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. 3 Rushinek, A. and Rushinek, S. "Mini/Micro Computer Evaluation of System Features: An Empirical Discriminant Model of Software and Hardware Expandability, Compatibility, Cost/Efficiency, Installation and Delivery," MANAGERIAL AND DECISION ECONOMICS, Vol. 5, No. 3, 150-159, September 1984.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. 4 Rushinek, A. and Rushinek, S. "Computer Assisted Manufacturing Software Related to User Satisfaction: An Interactive Knowledge Based System Using Diagnostic Audit Trails for Planning and Control," JOURNAL OF INFORMATION AND OPTIMIZATION SCIENCES, Vol. 6, No. 3, 1985.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. 5 Rushinek, A. and Rushinek, S. "Health and Medical Software Related to Computer User Satisfaction: An Interactive Online Expert System Using Diagnostic Audit Trails Through Telecommunication Networks," HEALTH POLICY, Vol. 4, 199-219, 1985.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. 6 Rushinek, A. and Rushinek, S. "Preliminary Studies On the Development of a Decision Support System for Evaluating Engineering and Scientific Software," ADVANCES IN ENGINEERING SOFTWARE, Vol. 7, No. 4, 173-178, 1985.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. 7 Rushinek, S. and Rushinek, A. "User Involvement in the Development and Use of Computer Based Systems for the Health and Rehabilitation Sciences: Reducing Protocol Errors," INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION RESEARCH, Vol. 8, No. 4, 443-454, 1985.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. 8 Rushinek, S. and Rushinek, A. "Effect of System Ratings on User Satisfaction," INFORMATION AGE, Vol. 7, No. 2, 98-106, April 1985.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. 9 Rushinek, A. and Rushinek, S. "Operating Systems, Compilers, Assemblers and Application Programs: Audit Trails of User Satisfaction," MICROPROCESSORS AND MICROSYSTEMS, Vol. 9, No. 5, 241-249, June 1985.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. 10 Rushinek, A. and Rushinek, S. "Health Marketing and Sales Distribution Software Related to Computer User Satisfaction," HEALTH MARKETING QUARTERLY, Vol. 3, No. 1, 79-101, Fall 1985.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. 11 Rushinek, A. and Rushinek, S. "Production and Inventory Management Software Packages Related to User Reactions," PRODUCTION AND INVENTORY MANAGEMENT, Vol. 27, No. 1, 75-84, 1986. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. 12 Rushinek, A. and Rushinek, S. "The Effects of Communication Monitors on User Satisfaction," INFORMATION PROCESSING AND MANAGEMENT, Vol. 22, No. 4, 345-351, January 1986. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. 13 Rushinek, A. and Rushinek, S. "The Influence of Trouble-Shooting, Education and Documentation on Computer User Satisfaction," IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SYSTEMS, MAN AND CYBERNETICS, Vol. SMC-16, No. 1, 165-167, January/February 1986. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. 14 Rushinek, A. and Rushinek, S. "What Makes Users Happy," COMMUNICATIONS OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR COMPUTING MACHINERY (ACM), Vol. 29, No. 7, 594-598, July 1986. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. 15 Rushinek, A. and Rushinek, S. "The Effects of Computer Location on End-user Satisfaction," INDUSTRIAL MANAGEMENT AND DATA SYSTEMS, 3-7, November-December 1986.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. 16 Rushinek, S. and Rushinek, A. "An Application Model for Computer Assisted Design and Manufacturing Using a Product Evaluation and Selection System," COMPUTERS & INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, Vol.12, No. 3, 173-180, 1987. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. 17 Rushinek, A. and Rushinek, S. "CAD-CAM (Computer Assisted Design- Computer Assisted Manufacturing) Electronic Design Case Study: A Needs Assessment for Microcomputer Users, Vendors and Consultants," INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF APPLIED ENGINEERING EDUCATION, Vol. 3, No. 3, 299-306, 1987.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. 18 Rushinek, S. and Rushinek, A. "Education, Scheduling and Administration Related to Computer User Satisfaction: An Interactive On-line Expert System Using Diagnostic Audit Trails Through Telecommunication Networks," INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF APPLIED ENGINEERING EDUCATION, Vol. 3, No. 4, 399-412, 1987.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. 19 Rushinek, A. and Rushinek, S. "Business Graphic Packages," JOURNAL OF SYSTEMS MANAGEMENT, Volume 39, No. 3, 12-21, March 1988. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. 20 Rushinek, A. and Rushinek, S. "Graphics Board (GB) Case Study: Feature Selection System for Microcomputer users and Manufacturers" INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MICROGRAPHICS & VIDEO TECHNOLOGY, 1988.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. 21 Rushinek, A. and Rushinek, S. "A Feature Selection System for Multiuser Databases," OMEGA: THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, Volume 17, No. 1, January 1989.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. 22 Rushinek, A. and Rushinek, S. "Accelerator Boards, Memory, Power, Coprocessor, and Price in an Automated and Networked Matching Algorithm of Users' Needs", COMPUTERS & ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING, Vol. 15, No.3/4, 131-142, 1989.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. 23 Rushinek, A. and Rushinek, S. "Training Software Case Study: A Product Evaluation and Selection System", JOURNAL OF EDUCATION FOR BUSINESS, 1989.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. 24 Rushinek, A. and Rushinek, S. "Matching Program Code Generators to Software Developers' Needs", OMEGA: THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, Vol. 18, No. 3, 1990.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. 25 Rushinek, A. and Rushinek, S. "Terminal Emulation Controllers, Duplex, Communication Protocols, Multisession Networks, Copy Protection, Baud-Rate, and Windows Compatibility: Profit Measures and Product Features", TELEMATICS AND INFORMATICS, Pergammon Press, Vol. 10, No. 1, 1993, 59-73. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. 26 Rushinek, A. and Rushinek, S. "Project Management Software Feature Profitability: Windows, Networks, Mainframes, Filtered Task Diagrams, Schedules, and Calendars, JOURNAL OF COMPUTER INFORMATION SYSTEMS (JCIS), Vol. 37, No. 4, Summer 1997, 48-55.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. What makes users unhappy: share-point team services web server security

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in

      Full Access

      • Published in

        cover image Ubiquity
        Ubiquity  Volume 2005, Issue January
        January 2005
        5 pages
        EISSN:1530-2180
        DOI:10.1145/1052128
        Issue’s Table of Contents

        Copyright © 2005 Authors

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 1 January 2005

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • editorial
      • Article Metrics

        • Downloads (Last 12 months)72
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)31

        Other Metrics

      HTML Format

      View this article in HTML Format .

      View HTML Format