Ulf Melin
ABSTRACT
This paper argues for the need to thoroughly understand the issue of symmetry and asymmetry, when analysing business interaction supported by inter-organisational information systems (IOS). Business interaction can be defined as consisting of business communication and exchange of value. Business action theory (BAT) divides business processes into six generic phases encompassing generic, interactive actions between a seller and a buyer. Different types of exchange occur in these phases. However, the BAT phases do not, in the present version, take the issue of symmetry and asymmetry (power between suppliers and customers) into enough account. In this paper, we elaborate the concepts of symmetry and asymmetry in business interaction in order to reach a better understanding of different types of relationships. We also highlight IOS as an important means that can both facilitate symmetry and cause asymmetry in a business interaction. The aim of the paper is to enhance the applicability of BAT for business interaction analysis by including and emphasising the notion of symmetry and asymmetry.
- Ahlström, M. Offset Management for Large Systems - A Multibusiness Marketing Activity. PhD dissertation, Department of Management and Economics, Linköping University, 2000.Google Scholar
- Akerlof, G. A. The Market for "Lemons": Quality, Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 84(3), 1970, 488--500.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Austin, J. L. How to Do Things with Words. Oxford University Press, 1962.Google Scholar
- Axelsson, B. and G. Easton. Industrial Networks: A New View of Reality. Routledge, London, 1992.Google Scholar
- Axelsson, K. Analysing Business Interaction in a Virtual Organisation - Using Business Action Theory to Study Complex Inter-organisational Contexts, Journal of Electronic Commerce in Organizations, 1(3), 1-27, July-Sept 2003.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Axelsson, K., Goldkuhl, G. and U. Melin. Using Business Action Theory for Dyadic Analysis, 10th Workshop on Interorganizational Research, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, 18-20 August 2000.Google Scholar
- Axelsson, K., Melin, U. and G. Goldkuhl. Understanding B2B Interaction - A Model to Accentuate Inter-organisational Systems Design Issues. In Wrycza, S. (Ed.) Proceedings of the 10th European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS'2002), 541--550.Google Scholar
- Axelsson, K. and P-A. Segerkvist. Interaction between Actors and Information Systems in Web-based Imaginary Organisations - Experiences from two Case Studies. In Ihlström, C., Svensson, B-M., and Svensson, J. (Eds.). Proceeding of 1st Nordic Workshop on Electronic Commerce 2001, 2001, 7--18.Google Scholar
- Denning, P. J. and R. Medina-Mora. Completing the Loops. Interfaces, 25(3), 1995, 42--57.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Denzin, N. K. and Y. S. Lincoln. Entering the Field of Qualitative Research, In Denzin, N. K. and Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research, Sage, 1994.Google Scholar
- Ewans, P. and T. S., Wurster. Blown to Bits: How the New Economics of Information Transforms Strategy. Boston, Mass. Harvard Business School Press, 2000. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Glynn, W. J. and U. Lehtinen. The Concept of Exchange: Interactive Approaches in Service Marketing. In Glynn, W. J. and J. G. Barnes (Eds.) Understanding Service Management, John Wiley, Chichester, 1995, 89--118.Google Scholar
- Goldkuhl, G. Generic Business Frameworks and Action Modelling. In Proceedings of Conference Language/Action Perspective '96, Springer Verlag, 1996. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Goldkuhl, G. The Six Phases of Business Processes - Business Communication and the Exchange of Value. In Proceedings of the Twelth Biennial ITS Conference (ITS'98), Stockholm, 1998.Google Scholar
- Goldkuhl, G. and U. Melin. Relationship Management vs. Business Transaction: Business Interaction as Design of Business Interaction. In Proceeding of the 10th International Annual IPSERA Conference, Jönköping International Business School, 2001, 431--443.Google Scholar
- Habermas, J. The Theory of Communicative Action. Reason and the Rationalization of Society. Volume 1, Beacon Press, 1984.Google Scholar
- Hedberg, B. and N-G Olve. Inside the Virtual Organization: Managing Imaginary Systems, Strategic Management Society, 17th Annual Conference, Barcelona, Oct. 5-8, 1997.Google Scholar
- Håkansson, H. (Ed.). International Marketing and Purchasing of Industrial Goods - An Interaction Approach. IMP Project Group, John Wiley, Chichester, 1982.Google Scholar
- Håkansson, H. and I. Snehota (Eds.). Developing Relationships in Business Networks. Thomason, London, 1995.Google Scholar
- Håkansson, H. and I. Snehota. The Burden of relationships or Who's Next. In Naude, P. and P. W. Turnbull (Eds.) Network Dynamics in International Marketing, Pergamon, Oxford, 1998.Google Scholar
- Johnsen, R. E. and D. Ford. Asymmetrical and Symmetrical Customer-Supplier Relationships: A Typology, In Proceeding of the 10th International Annual IPSERA Conference, Jönköping International Business School, 2001, 497--508.Google Scholar
- Kumar, K. and H. G. van Dissel. Sustainable Collaboration: Managing Conflict and Cooperation in Interorganizational Systems. MIS Quarterly, 20(3), 1996, 279--296. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Melin, U. and G. Goldkuhl. Information Systems and Process Orientation - Evaluation and Change Using Business Action Theory. In Systems Development Methods for Databases, Enterprise Modelling, and Workflow Management. (Wojtkowski, W., Wojtkowski, W. G., Wrycza, S. and J. Zupancic, Eds.), Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, New York, 1999, 233--244.Google Scholar
- Oliver, C. Determinants of Interorganizational Relationships: Integration and Future Directions, Academy of Management Review, 15(2), 1990, 241--265.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Searle, J. R., Speech Acts. An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge University Press, London, 1969.Google Scholar
- Stake, R. E., Case Studies, In Denzin, N. K., Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.). Handbook of Qualitative Research, Sage, 1994, 236--247.Google Scholar
- Walsham, G., Interpreting Information Systems in Organizations, John Wiley, Chichester, 1993. Google ScholarDigital Library
Recommendations
A meta-model of business interaction for assisting intelligent workflow systems
KES-AMSTA'11: Proceedings of the 5th KES international conference on Agent and multi-agent systems: technologies and applicationsBusiness interaction is a significant aspect of intelligent workflow systems, which are envisaged to deal with dynamic and interorganisational environments. However, automating business interaction in an intelligent way is not an easy task. To address ...
The constituents of business interaction: generic layered patterns
Special issue: The language/action perspectiveIn order to perform business modelling as apart of information systems development, there is a need for frameworks and methods. The paper proposes a framework for business interaction based on a language/ action perspective. The framework is an ...
Application of principles of event related open systems to business process reengineering
This paper is focused on analysing the complete business environment with the help of information technology. It takes into account various interactions between different business processes while conducting BPR exercise. It also provides a framework ...
Comments