skip to main content
10.1145/1055558.1055603acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagespodsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Multi-valued dependencies in the presence of lists

Published:14 June 2004Publication History

ABSTRACT

Multi-valued depdendencies (MVDs) are an important class of relational constraints. We axiomatise MVDs in data models that support nested list types. In order to capture different data models at a time, an abstract approach based on nested attributes is taken. The set of subattributes of some fixed nested attribute carries the structure of a co-Heyting algebra. This enables us to generalise significant features of MVDs from the relational data model to the presence of lists. It is shown that an MVD is satisfied by some instance exactly when this instance can be decomposed without loss of information. The full power of the algebraic framework allows to provide a sound and complete set of inference rules for the finite implication of MVDs in the context of lists. The presence of the list operator calls for a new inference rule which is not required in the relational data model. Further differences become apparant when the minimality of the inference rules is investigated. The extension of the relational theory of MVDs to the presence of lists allows to specify more real-world constraints and increases therefore the number of application domains.

References

  1. S. Abiteboul, P. Buneman, and D. Suciu. Data on the Web: From Relations to Semistructured Data and XML. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. S. Abiteboul, R. Hull, and V. Vianu. Foundations of Databases. Addison-Wesley, 1995. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. M. Arenas and L. Libkin. A normal form for XML documents. In PODS 2002. ACM, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. M. Atkinson, F. Bancilhon, D. DeWitt, K. Dittrich, D. Maier, and S. Zdonik. The object-oriented database system manifesto. In Proc. of Intl. Conf. on Deductive and Object-Oriented Databases, pages 40--57, 1989.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. C. Batini, S. Ceri, and S. B. Navathe. Conceptual Database Design: An Entity-Relationship Approach, Benjamin Cummings, 1992. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. C. Beeri. On the membership problem for functional and multivalued dependencies in relational databases. TODS, 5(3):241--259, 1980. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. C. Beeri. A formal approach to object-oriented databases. Data and Knowledge Engeneering, 5(4):353--382, 1990. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. C. Beeri and P. A. Bernstein. Computational problems related to the design of normal form relational schemata. In Transactions on Database Systems, pages 30--59. ACM, 1979. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. C. Beeri, R. Fagin, and J. H. Howard. A complete axiomatization for functional and multivalued dependencies in database relations. In International Conference on Management of Data, pages 47--61. ACM, 1977. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. J. Biskup. On the complementation rule for multivalued dependencies in database relations. Acta Informatica, 10(3):297--305, 1978.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. J. Biskup,. Database schema design theory:achievements and challenges. In International Conference on Information Systems and Management of Data, number 1066 in LNCS, pages 14--44. Springer, 1995.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. J. Biskup. Achievements of relational database schema design theory revisited. In Semantics in databases, number 1358 in LNCS, pages 29 54. Springer, 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. F. Bry and P. Kröger. A computational biology database digest: data, data analysis, and data management. Distributed and Parallel Databases, 13(1):7--42, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. P. Buneman, S. Davidson, W. Fan, C. Hara, and W. Tan. Keys for XML. In Tenth WWW Conference. IEEE, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. P. P. Chen. The entity-relationship model: Towards a unified view of data. ACM Transactions Database Systems 1, pages 9--36, 1976. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. P. P. Chen. English sentence structure and entity-relationship diagrams. Information Science 29, pages 127--149, 1983.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. C. Delobel. Normalisation and hierarchical dependencies in the relational data model. ToDS, 3(3):201--222, 1978. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. A. Dovier, A. Policriti, and G. Rossi. A uniform axiomatic view of lists, multisets, and sets, and the unification algorithm. Fundamenta Informaticae, 36(2/3):201--234, 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. R. Fagin. Multivalued dependencies and a new normal form for relational databases. Association for Computing Machinery, 2(3):262--278, 1977. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. R. Fagin. A normal form for relational databases that is based on domains and keys. TODS, pages 387--415, 1981. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. R. Fagin and M. Vardi. The theory of data dependencies: a survey. In Mathematics of Information Processing: Proceedings of Symposia in Applied Mathematics, pages 19--71. American Mathematical Society, 1986.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. W. Fan and L. Libkin. On XML integrity constraints in the presence of DTDs. In PODS 2001. ACM, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. W. Fan and J. Siméon. Integrity constraints for XML. In PODS 2000. ACM, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. D. Fishman, D. Beech, H. Cate, and E. e. a. Chow. Iris:an object-oriented database management system. ToIS, 5(1), 1987.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Z. Galil. An almost linear-time algorithm for computing a dependency basis in a relational database. Journal of the ACM, 29(1):96--102, 1982. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. G. Gardarin, J.-P. Cheiney, G. Kiernan, D. Pastre, and H. Stora. Managing complex objects in an extensible relational DBMS. In VLDB, 1989, Amsterdam, pages 55--65. Morgan Kaufmann, 1989. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. G. Grahne and K. Räihä. Database decomposition into 4NF. In 9th VLDB, pages 186--196, 1983. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. K. Hagihara, M. Ito, K. Taniguchi, and T. Kasami. Decision problems for multivalued dependencies in relational databases. SIAM Journal of Computation, 8(2):247--264, 1979.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. S. Hartmann. Decomposing relationship types by pivoting and schema equivalence. Data & Knowledge Engineering, 39:75--99, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. S. Hartmann and S. Link, More functional dependencies for XML. In Advances in Databases and Information Systems, volume 2798 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 355--369, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. S. Hartmann, S. Link, and K.-D. Schewe. A new normal form for conceptual databases. In Information Modelling and Knowledge Bases XV, Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications, pages 88--105. IOS Press, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. S. Hartmann, S. Link, and K.-D. Schewe. Functional dependencies in the presence of records, lists, sets and multisets. Technical Report 1/2004, Information Science Research Centre, Massey University, Department of Information Systems, Palmerston North, New Zealand, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. S. Hartmann, S. Link, and K.-D. Schewe. Reasoning about functional and multi-valued dependencies in the presence of lists. In Foundations of Information and Knowledge Systems, volume 2942 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 134--154, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. R. Hull and R. King. Semantic database modeling: Survey, applications and research issues. ACM Computing Surveys, 19(3), 1987. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. M. Levene. The Nested Universal Relation Database Model. Springer, 1992.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. J. McKinsey and A. Tarski. On closed elements in closure algebras. Annals of Mathematics, 47:122--146, 1946.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. A. Mendelzon. On axiomatising multivalued dependencies in relational databases. Journal of the ACM, 26(1):37--44, 1979. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. W. Y. Mok, Y. K. Ng, and D. W. Embley. A normal form for precisely charachterizing redundancy in nested relations. Transactions on Database Systems, 21:77--106, 1996. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. S. Naqvi and S. Tsur. A logical language for data and knowledge bases. Computer Science Press, 1989. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Z. M. özsoyoglu and L. Y. Yuan. A new normal form for nested relations. Transactions on Database Systems, 12:111--136, 1987. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. Z. M. özsoyoglu and L. Y. Yuan. Reduced mvds and minimal covers. Transactions on Database Systems, 12(3):377--394, 1987. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. J. Paredaens, P. De Bra, M. Gyssens, and D. Van Gucht. The Structure of the Relational Database Model. Springer-Verlag, 1989. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  43. J. Richardson. Supporting lists in a datamodel. In Proceeding of VLDB, pages 127--192, 1992. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. Y. Sagiv. An algorithm for inferring multivalued dependencies with an application to propositional logic. Journal of the ACM, 27(2):250--262, 1980. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  45. K.-D. Schewe and B. Thalheim. Fundamental concepts of object oriented databases. Acta Cybernetica, 11(4):49--85, 1993.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. M. Scholl and H.-J. Schek. A relational object model. In Proceedings of International Conference on Database Theory (ICDT), pages 89--105. Springer Lecture Notes Series, 1990. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  47. P. Seshadri, M. Livny, and R. Ramakrishnan. The design and implementation of sequence database system. In VLDB, Mumbai, India, 1996. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  48. Z. Tari, J. Stokes, and S. Spaccapietra. Object normal forms and dependency constraints for object-oriented schemata. ACM ToDS, 22:513--569, 1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  49. B. Thalheim. Dependencies in Relational Databases. Teubner-Verlag, 1991.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  50. B. Thalheim. Entity-Relationship Modeling: Foundations of Database Technology. Springer-Verlag, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  51. A. M. Tjoa and L. Berger. Transformation of requirement specifications expressed in natural language into an eer model. In Entity-Relationship Approach, volume 823 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer, 1993. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  52. M. Y. Vardi. Fundamentals of dependency theory. In E. Börger, editor, Trends in Theoretical Computer Science, pages 171--224. Computer Science Press, 1987.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  53. M. Vincent and J. Liu. Multivalued dependencies in XML. In BNCOD, volume 2712 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 4--18. Springer, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  54. M. Vincent, J. Liu, and C. Liu. A redundancy free 4NF for XML. In XML Database Symposium, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  55. M. Vincent and B. Srinivasan. Redundancy and the justification of fourth normal form in relational databases. International Journal of Foundations of Computer Science, 4(4):355--365, 1993.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  56. M. Vincent and B. Srinivasan. Update anomalies and the justification of fourth normal form in relational databases. Information Sciences, 81:87--102, 1994. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  57. G. Vossen. A new characterization of fd implication with an application to update anomalies. Information Processing Letters, 29:131--135, 1988. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  58. W3C. Xml schema part 2: Datatypes. http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-2/#datatype, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  59. C. Zaniolo. Analysis and Design of Relational Schemata for Database Systems. PhD thesis, UCLA, Technical Report UCLA-ENG-7769, 1976. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Conferences
    PODS '04: Proceedings of the twenty-third ACM SIGMOD-SIGACT-SIGART symposium on Principles of database systems
    June 2004
    350 pages
    ISBN:158113858X
    DOI:10.1145/1055558

    Copyright © 2004 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 14 June 2004

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • Article

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate642of2,707submissions,24%

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader