skip to main content
article

Waypoint navigation with a vibrotactile waist belt

Published:01 April 2005Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Presenting waypoint navigation on a visual display is not suited for all situations. The present experiments investigate if it is feasible to present the navigation information on a tactile display. Important design issue of the display is how direction and distance information must be coded. Important usability issues are the resolution of the display and its usefulness in vibrating environments. In a pilot study with 12 pedestrians, different distance-coding schemes were compared. The schemes translated distance to vibration rhythm while the direction was translated into vibration location. The display consisted of eight tactors around the user's waist. The results show that mapping waypoint direction on the location of vibration is an effective coding scheme that requires no training, but that coding for distance does not improve performance compared to a control condition with no distance information. In Experiment 2, the usefulness of the tactile display was shown in two case studies with a helicopter and a fast boat.

References

  1. ANSI S3.18-1979(R1999). American National Standard Guide for the Evaluation of Human Exposure to Whole-Body Vibration. American National Standards of the Acoustical Society of America.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Bosman, S., Groenendaal, B., Findlater, J. W., Visser, T., De Graaf, M., and Markopoulos, P. 2003. GentleGuide: An exploration of haptic output for indoors pedestrian guidance. In Proceedings of the Mobile HCI, Udine, Italy.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Burnett, G. E. and Porter, J. M. 2002. An empirical comparison of the use of distance versus landmark information within the human-machine interface for vehicle navigation systems. In Human Factors in Transportation, Communication, Health, and the Workplace, D. De Waard, K. A. Brookhuis, J. Moraal, and A. Toffetti, Eds. Shaker Publishing, Maastricht.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Castle, H. and Dobbins, T. 2004. Tactile displays for enhanced performance and safety. Paper presented at the 11th SAfE (Europe) Symposium, Lyon, France. SAfE Europe, Bracknell, UK.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Chiasson, J., McGrath, B., and Rupert, A. 2002. Enhanced situation awareness in sea, air and land environments. In NATO RTO Human Factors and Medicine Meeting Proceedings.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Cholewiak, R. W. and Collins, A. A. 2000. The generation of vibrotactile patterns on a linear array: Influences of body site, time, and presentation mode. Perception and Psychophysics 62, 6, 1220--1235.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Ceguara, J., Traylor, R., Lim, A., Glassley, J., Casteel, R., and Tan, H. 1999. Investigating the Use of Tactile Feedback Systems to Enhance Spatial Awareness in Altered-Gravity Environments. Summery Report for the NASA KC-135-A Life Sciences Report.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Cobbins, T. and Samway, S. 2002. The use of tactile navigation cues in high-speed craft operations. In Proceedings of the RINA Conference on High Speed Craft: Technology and Operation. The Royal Institution of Naval Architects, London, 13--20.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Ertan, S., Lee, C., Willets, A., Tan, H., and Pentland, A. 1998. A wearable haptic navigation guidance system. In Digest of the 2nd International Symposium on Wearable Computers, 164--165. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. McGrath, B. J., Estrada, A., Braithwaite, M. G., Raj, A. K., and Rupert, A. H. 2004. Tactile Situation Awareness System Flight Demonstration Final Report. Rep. No. 2004-10. Naval Aerospace Medical Research Laboratory, Pensacola, USA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Raj, A. K., Suri, N., Braithwaite, M. G., and Rupert, A. H. 1998. The tactile situation awareness system in rotary wing aircraft: Flight test results. In Proceedings of the RTA/HFM Symposium on Current Aeromedical Issues in Rotary Wing Operations. RTO NATO, Neuilly-sur-Seine, France, 16.1--16.7.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Rochlis, J. L. and Newman, D. J. 2000. A tactile display for International Space Station (ISS) extravehicular activity (EVA). Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine 71, 6, 571--578.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Rupert, A. H. 2000. An instrumentation solution for reducing spatial disorientation mishaps. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology 19, 71--80.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Sklar A. E. and Sarter N. B. 1999. Good vibrations: Tactile feedback in support of attention allocation and human-automation coordination in event-driven domains. Human Factors 41, 4, 543--452.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Traylor, R. and Tan, H. 2002. Development of a wearable haptic display for situation awareness in altered-gravity environment: Some initial findings. In Proceedings of the 10th Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems. IEEE Computer Society, Press, Los Atamitos, CA. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Van Erp, J. B. F. 2002. Guidelines for the use of vibro-tactile displays in human computer interaction. In Proceedings Eurohaptics 2002, Edinburgh, S. A. Wall et al., Eds. 18--22.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Van Erp, J. B. F. 2005. Presenting directions with a vibro-tactile torso display. Ergonomics 48.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Van Erp, J. B. F. and Van Veen, H. A. H. C. 2003. A multi-purpose tactile vest for astronauts in the International Space Station. In Proceedings of Eurohaptics 2003, Trinity College, Dublin Ireland, 405--408.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Van Erp, J. B. F. and Van Veen, H. A. H. C. 2004. Vibrotactile in-vehicle navigation system. Transportation Research Part F 7, 247--256.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Van Erp, J. B. F., Veltman, J. A., Van Veen, H. A. H. C., and Oving, A. B. 2003. Tactile torso display as countermeasure to reduce night vision goggles induced drift. In Spatial Disorientation in Military Vehicles: Causes, Consequences and Cures. RTO Meeting Proceedings 86. NATO RTO; Neuilly-sur-Seine, 49-1--49-8.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Van Erp, J. B. F. and Verschoor, M. H. 2004. Cross-modal visual and vibro-tactile tracking. Applied Ergonomics 35, 105--112.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Van Erp, J. B. F. and Werkhoven, P. J. 2004. Vibro-tactile and visual asynchronies: Sensitivity and consistency. Perception 33, 103--111.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Wickens, C. D. 1984. Processing resources in attention. In Varieties in Attention, R. Parasuraman and D. R. Davis, Eds. Academic, London. 63--102.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Wickens, C. D. and Liu, Y. 1988. Codes and modalities in multiple resources: A success and A qualification. Human Factors 30, 5, 599--616. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Waypoint navigation with a vibrotactile waist belt

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in

          Full Access

          • Published in

            cover image ACM Transactions on Applied Perception
            ACM Transactions on Applied Perception  Volume 2, Issue 2
            April 2005
            112 pages
            ISSN:1544-3558
            EISSN:1544-3965
            DOI:10.1145/1060581
            Issue’s Table of Contents

            Copyright © 2005 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 1 April 2005
            Published in tap Volume 2, Issue 2

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • article

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader