skip to main content
10.1145/1065579.1065588acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesdacConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Variability and energy awareness: a microarchitecture-level perspective

Published:13 June 2005Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper proposes microarchitecture-level models for Within Die (WID) process and system parameter variability that can be included in the design of high-performance processors. Since decisions taken at microarchitecture level have the largest impact on both performance and power, on one hand, and global variability effect, on the other hand, models and associated metrics are needed for their joint characterization and analysis. To assess how these variations affect or are affected by microarchitecture decisions, we propose a joint performance, power and variability metric that is able to distinguish among various design choices. As a design-driver for the modeling methodology, we consider a clustered high-performance processor implementation, along with its Globally Asynchronous, Locally Synchronous (GALS) counterpart. Results show that, when comparing the baseline, synchronous and its GALS counterpart, microarchitecture-driven impact of process variability translates into 2-10% faster local clocks for the GALS case, while when taking into account the effect of on-chip temperature variability, local clocks can be 8-18% faster. If, in addition, voltage scaling (DVS) is employed, the GALS architecture with DVS is 26% better in terms of the joint quality metric employing energy, performance, and variability.

References

  1. E. Acar, A. Devgan, R. Rao, Y. Liu, H. Su, S. Nassif, J. Burns, "Leakage and Leakage Sensitivity Computation for Combinational Circuits," in Proc. ACM/IEEE Intl. Symp. on Low Power Electronics and Design, pp. 96--99, Aug. 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. A. Basu, S. Lin, V. Wason, A. Mehrotra, and K. Banerjee, "Simultaneous Optimization of Supply and Threshold Voltages for Low-Power and High-Performance Circuits in the Leakage Dominant Era," in Proc. ACM/IEEE Design Automation Conference, June 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. S. Borkar, T. Karnik, V. De, "Design and Reliability Challenges in Nanometer Technologies," in Proc. ACM/IEEE Design Automation Conf., June 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. K.A. Bowman, S.G. Duvall, J.M. Meindl, "Impact of Die-to-Die and WIthin-Die Parameter Fluctuations on the Maximum Clock Frequency Distribution for Gigascale Integration," in IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol.37, no.2, Feb.2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. D. Brooks, V. Tiwari, and M. Martonosi, "Wattch: A Framework for Architectural-Level Power Analysis and Optimizations", in Proc. ACM Intl. Symp. on Computer Architecture, June 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. J. A. Butts, and G. S. Sohi, "A Static Power Model for Architects," in Proc. Intl. Symp. on Microarchitecture, pp. 191-201, Dec. 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. M. Eisele, J. Berthold, D. Schmidt-Landsiedel, R. Mahnkopf, "The Impact of Intra-Die Device Parameter Variations on Path Delays and on the Design for Yield of ow Voltage Digital Circuits," in Proc. ACM/IEEE Intl. Symp. on Low Power Electronics and Design, Aug. 1996. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. A. Iyer and D. Marculescu, "Power efficiency of Multiple Clock, Multiple Voltage Cores", in Proc. IEEE/ACM Intl. Conf. on Computer-Aided Design, San Jose, CA, Nov. 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. S. McFarling, "Combining branch predictors", Technical Report DEC WRL Technical Note TN-36, DEC Western Research Laboratory, 1993.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. S. Palacharla, N. P. Jouppi, and J. E. Smith, "Complexity-effective superscalar processors," in Proc. ACM Intl. Symp. on Computer Architecture, June 1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. G. Semeraro, D.H. Albonesi, S.G. Dropsho, G. Magklis, S. Dwarkadas, and M.L. Scott, "Dynamic Frequency and Voltage Control for a Multiple Clock Domain Microarchitecture," in Proc. ACM Intl Symp. on Microarchitecture, Nov. 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. K. Skadron, M. R. Stan, W. Huang, S. Velusamy, K. Sankaranarayanan, and D. Tarjan, "Temperature-Aware Microarchitecture," in Proc. ACM Intl. Symp. on Computer Architecture, June 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. E. Talpes and D. Marculescu, "A Critical Analysis of Application-Adaptive Multiple Clock Processors," in Proc. ACM/IEEE Intl. Symp. on Low Power Electronics and Design, Aug. 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. J. Tschanz, J.T. Kao, S.G. Narendra, R. Nair, D.A. Antoniadis, A.P. Chandrakasan, V. De, "Adaptive Body Bias for Reducing Impacts of Die-to-Die and Within-Die Parameter Variations on Microprocessor Frequency and Leakage," in IEEE Jrnl of Solid-State Circuits, v.37, n.11, Nov 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Variability and energy awareness: a microarchitecture-level perspective

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        DAC '05: Proceedings of the 42nd annual Design Automation Conference
        June 2005
        984 pages
        ISBN:1595930582
        DOI:10.1145/1065579

        Copyright © 2005 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 13 June 2005

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • Article

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate1,770of5,499submissions,32%

        Upcoming Conference

        DAC '24
        61st ACM/IEEE Design Automation Conference
        June 23 - 27, 2024
        San Francisco , CA , USA

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader