skip to main content
10.1145/1066677.1067018acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessacConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

NextGen eXtreme porting: structured by automation

Authors Info & Claims
Published:13 March 2005Publication History

ABSTRACT

"Maintenance is really the normal state of an XP project" - Beck. Thus porting is a natural candidate for eXtreme Programming and we present a novel tool-based XP methodology for porting C/C++ programs. The structure provided by our tooling is designed for scalability, to enable XP on large projects porting enterprise-scale codebases. Overall planning and iteration planning of the methodology are assisted by a novel, first-of-its-kind migration orchestrator tool. Automated test, debugging, and audit function are provided as unified support by our refactoring tool framework. We focus on the orchestrator tool and offer preliminary benchmarks with encouraging results.

References

  1. Baxter, I. D., Pidgeon, C. and Mehlich, M. DMS: Program Transformations for Practical Scalable Software Evolution. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE'04) (Edinburgh, United Kingdom, May 23-28, 2004), 625--634.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Beck, K. Extreme Programming explained: embrace change. Pearson Education, Reading, Singapore, 2000.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Boger, M., Baier, T., Wienberg, F. and Lamersdorf, W. Extreme Modeling. In Proceedings of the International conference on eXtreme Programming and Flexible Processes in Software Engineering (XP '00) (Cagliari, Italy, June 21-23, 2000) www.extrememodeling.org/docs/XM.ps.gz]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Crocker, R. The 5 reasons XP can't scale and what to do about them. In Proc. International Conference on eXtreme Programming and Flexible Processes in Software Eng. (XP '01) (Villasimius, Sardinia, Italy, May 20-23, 2001) www.xp2003.org/conference/papers/Chapter15-Crocker.pdf]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Deursen, A. V., Kuipers, T. and Moonen, L. Legacy to the Extreme. In Proceedings of the International Conference on eXtreme Programming and Flexible Processes in Software Engineering (XP '00) (Cagliari, Italy, June 21-23, 2000) homepages.cwi.nl/~arie/papers/xp2000.pdf]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Elssamadisy, A. and Schalliol, G. Recognizing and Responding to "Bad Smells" in Extreme Programming. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE'02) (Orlando, Florida, USA, May 19-25, 2002), 617--622.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. George, B. and Williams, L. An Initial Investigation of Test Driven Development in Industry. In Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Applied Computing(SAC '03) (Melbourne, Florida, USA, March 9-12, 2003) 1135--1139.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. ISO/IEC 14882:1998 C++ standard, 1998, www.iso.org]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. ISO/IEC 9899:1999 C standard, 1999. Also, ISO/IEC 9899: 1999 C Technical Corrigendum, 2001, www.iso.org.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Janes, A., Russo, B., Zuliani, P. and Succi, G. An Empirical Analysis on the Discontinuous Use of Pair Programming. In Proceedings of the International Conference on eXtreme Programming and Agile Processes in Software Engineering (XP '03) (Genova, Italy, May 25-29, 2003) Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Springer, Vol. 2675, 205--214.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Kajko-Mattsson, M., Jonson, M., Koroorian, S. and Westin, F. Lesson Learned from Attempts to Implement Daily Build. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Software Maintenance and Reengineering(CSMR'04) (Tampere, Finland, March 24-26, 2004) 137--146.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Lippert, M., Roock, S., Tunkel, R. and Wolf, H. Stabilizing the XP Process Using Specialized Tools. In Proc. Int. Conference on eXtreme Programming and Flexible Processes in Software Engineering (XP '01) (Villasimius, Sardinia, Italy, May 20-23, 2001). www.agilealliance.org/articles/articles/StabilizingTheXPProcess.pdf]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Lui, K. M. and Chan, K. C. C. When Does a Pair Outperform Two Individuals?. In Proceedings of the International Conference on eXtreme Programming and Agile Processes in Software Engineering (XP '03) (Genova, Italy, May 25-29, 2003) Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Springer, Vol. 2675, 225--233.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Maximilien, E. M. and Williams, L. Assessing Test-Driven Development at IBM. In Proc. IEEE International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE'03) (Portland, Oregon, USA, May 3-10, 2003) 564--569.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Muller, M. M. and Padberg, F. On the Economic Evaluation of XP Projects. In Proceedings of ACM International Symposium on Foundations of Software Enfineering(FSE'03) (Helsinki, Finland, Sep. 1-5, 2003) ACM Press, 168--177]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Pazel, D. P., Varma, P., Paradkar A., Tibbitts B., Anand A. and Charles P. A Framework and Tool for Porting Assessment and Remediation. IEEE International conference on Software Maintenance (ICSM '04) (Chicago, Ilinois, September 11-17, 2004).]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Poole, C. J., Murphy, T., Huisman, J. W. and Higgins, A. Extreme Maintenance. In Proc. IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance (ICSM '01) (Florence, Italy, Nov. 7-9, 2001). 301--311.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Rationale for C99 standardization, Version 5.1, April 2003 wwwold.dkuug.dk/JTC1/SC22/WG14/www/C99RationaleV 5.10.pdf.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Visser, E. Stratego: A language for program transformation based on rewriting strategies. In (A. Middledrop, editor) Rewriting Techniques and Applications, 2001(RTA'01), Springer-Verlag Lecture Notes in Computer Science Vol. 2051, 357--361.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Weyuker, E. J. Using Operational Distributions to Judge Testing Progress. In Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Applied Computing(SAC '03) (Melbourne, Florida, USA, March 9-12, 2003) ACM Press, 1118--1122]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. www.eclipse.org]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. www.gnu.org]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Yuan, J., Holcombe, M. and Gheorghe, M. Where Do Unit Tests Come from?. In Proceedings of the International Conference on eXtreme Programming and Agile Processes in Software Engineering (XP '03) (Genova, Italy, May 25-29, 2003) Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Springer, Vol. 2675, 161--169.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. NextGen eXtreme porting: structured by automation

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        SAC '05: Proceedings of the 2005 ACM symposium on Applied computing
        March 2005
        1814 pages
        ISBN:1581139640
        DOI:10.1145/1066677

        Copyright © 2005 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 13 March 2005

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • Article

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate1,650of6,669submissions,25%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader