skip to main content
10.1145/1068009.1068243acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesgeccoConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Application of genetic algorithm to optimize burnable poison placement in pressurized water reactors

Published:25 June 2005Publication History

ABSTRACT

An efficient and a practical genetic algorithm tool was developed and applied successfully to Burnable Poisons (BPs) placement optimization problem in the reference Three Mile Island-1 (TMI-1) core. Core BP optimization problem means developing a BP loading map for a given core loading configuration that minimizes the total Gadolinium (Gd) amount in the core without violating any design constraints. The number of UO2/Gd2O3 pins and Gd2O3 concentrations for each fresh fuel location in the core are the decision variables and the total amount of the Gd in the core is in the objective function. The main objective is to develop the BP loading pattern to minimize the total Gd in the core together with the with residual binding at End-of-Cycle (EOC) and to keep the maximum peak pin power and Soluble Boron Concentration (SOB) at the Beginning of Cycle (BOC) both less than their limit values during core depletion. The innovation of this study was to search all of the feasible U/Gd fuel assembly designs with variable number of U/Gd pins and concentration of Gd2O3 in the overall decision space. The use of different fitness functions guides the solution towards desired (good solutions) region in the solution space, which accelerates the GA solution. The main objective of this study was to develop a practical and efficient GA tool and to apply this tool for designing BP patterns of a given core loading.

References

  1. Li Z., 1993, An Automatic Optimal Pressurized Water Reactor Reload Design Expert System, Ph.D., A Thesis in Nuclear Engineering, The Penn State University. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Haibach B., 1996, A Study of the Optimization of IFBA Using Deterministic Methods and the Genetic Algorithm Based CIGARO Fuel Management System, M.S Thesis, The Pennsylvania State University.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Yilmaz S., Ivanov K., Levine S., and Mahgerefteh M., 2003, Automating the Optimization of Burnable Poisons In PWRs, American Nuclear Society, Advances In Nuclear Fuel Management III, October 5-8, 2003, Hilton Head Island, South Carolina, USA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. DeChaine, M., 1995, Stochastic Fuel Management Optimization Using Genetic Algorithm and Heuristic Rules, Ph. D., Thesis in Nuclear Engineering, The Penn State University. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Guler, C., 2002, Development of VVER Core Loading Optimization System, M.S Thesis, The Penn State University.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Hongchun W., 2001, Pressurized Water Reactor Reloading Optimization Using Genetic Algorithms, Annals of Nuclear Energy, 28 1329--1341.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Kropaczek D., and Turinsky P., 1991, In-Core Nuclear Fuel Management Optimization for Pressurized Water Reactors Utilizing Simulated Annealing, Nuclear Technology, Volume 95.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Maldonado G., and E. Klee, T., 1997, A Coupling of Within-Bundle Loading Optimization to Lattice Physics Calculations, Proc. Topl. Advances in Nuclear Fuel Management II, Vol 2, South Carolina.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Keller P., M., 2003, FORMOSA-P Advanced GA Methodology, Advances in Nuclear Fuel Management III, Hilton Head, SC, October 5-8.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Keller P., M., and Turinsky P., J., 1996, FORMOSA-P Multiple Adaptive Penalty Function Methodology, Trans. Am. Nucl. Soc., 75, pp. 341--342, Washington, DC.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. PATRICK S., K., et al., 1983, Optimization by Simulated Annealing, Science, 220, 671.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Goldberg, David E., 1989, Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optimization and Machine Learning, Addison-Wesley Pub. Co. ISBN: 0201157675. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Deb K., 2001, Multi-Objective Optimization using Evolutionary Algorithms, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Westinghouse Proprietary Class 2 Notes, February 2004, Core Design Training Course, Presented to Penn State University.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. CASMO-3, 1994, A Fuel Assembly Burnup Program User's Manual Version 4.8", STUDSVIK/SOA-94/9.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. SIMULATE-3, 1995, Advanced Three-Dimensional Two-Group Reactor Analysis Code", STUDSVIK/SOA-95/15.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Back, T., Fogel, D., B., and Michalewicz, Z., "Evolutionary Computation 2 - Advanced Algorithms and Operators", IOP Publishing Ltd., (2000). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Application of genetic algorithm to optimize burnable poison placement in pressurized water reactors

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      GECCO '05: Proceedings of the 7th annual conference on Genetic and evolutionary computation
      June 2005
      2272 pages
      ISBN:1595930108
      DOI:10.1145/1068009

      Copyright © 2005 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 25 June 2005

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • Article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate1,669of4,410submissions,38%

      Upcoming Conference

      GECCO '24
      Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference
      July 14 - 18, 2024
      Melbourne , VIC , Australia

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader